|
<Back | Home | Basics | Departments | Get Involved | Site Map | What's New
Update on Almond PasteurizationThe Cornucopia Institute has provided us with the following update: I want to provide a brief update on our visit to Washington, D.C. and
our meeting Cornucopia's Co-director, Mark Kastel, and Eli Penberthy met for more than an hour with the three officials in the office of USDA Undersecretary Bruce Knight. The bulk of their discussion centered on almonds. Interestingly, we learned that half of all the comments coming into the Secretary's office at this time are on almonds! People across the country are upset with the pasteurization plan and want the ability to again buy raw, untreated, domestically grown almonds. We want to thank and congratulate all our collaborators on helping elicit such a strong response. As you know, people have been mailing us individually signed proxy letters for us to hand-deliver to Washington. We used this meeting as an opportunity to hand them a stack of well over 1500 letters. It was an impressive moment, and we were told that now all these new contacts will have to be logged in with the thousands of previous public comments received on this issue (more letters continue coming into our offices which we will deliver again to the USDA in the near future-please encourage anyone who has not submitted a proxy yet to download one from the Cornucopia website). We were asked why there was such a public outcry on this rule with
the officials We then offered a compromise proposal for USDA to consider, one that we believe can help resolve this situation. We suggested that USDA support a plan allowing for the sale of untreated American grown almonds with a warning label. The warning label serves two purposes: it allows for continued freedom of choice in the marketplace and it allows marketers the option of continuing to "pasture as" raw almonds. Having a warning label is by no means our first choice but might be
the only The warning label approach is something that is already done for other foods sold in the U.S., such as some fresh, unpasteurized fruit juices. We know that FDA would have to be involved with such a labeling action, but we fully believe that if USDA throws its weight behind the proposal (along with the thousands of consumers and commercial interests who would support this) that such an approach would likely gain approval at the FDA. USDA officials also questioned us on a second and companion solution
- a
Clearly for this proposal to gather more support from USDA, it will
have to be We are going to ask those of you who have been working with us on this
issue to give the process a little more time to play out, perhaps into
mid-January before we move onto other steps, primarily legal. We made
certain that the officials in this meeting knew that we are prepared
to go to court and challenge the almond But that doesn't mean we are going to sit around waiting for their decision. We have had lengthy additional talks with attorneys about a possible legal challenge, are continuing to network with other organizations around the country, we are gathering more information from farmers hurt by the rule and from retailers and product manufacturers who are shifting to untreated raw foreign almonds to meet consumer demand. We will also be talking with more members of Congress about this. Most of all, we want to keep the heat turned-up on the USDA and we are encouraging all of you to help with that. Please continue sharing with us any information, thoughts, and/or questions that you think would be useful in this campaign. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Will Fantle PS: Because the negotiations with the USDA are at a critical moment
we would To download proxy letters go to www.cornucopia.org and go to the Authentic Almond Project link on the left hand navigation column.
<Back | Home | Tour | Calendar | Contact Us | Funding | Join Now |
||||