|
<Back
| Home | Basics |
Departments | Get
Involved | Site Map | What's
New

The Double Danger of
High Fructose Corn Syrup
By Bill Sanda, BS, MBA
For many years, Dr. Meira Fields and her coworkers at the US Department
of Agriculture investigated the harmful effects of dietary sugar on
rats. They discovered that when male rats are fed a diet deficient in
copper, with sucrose as the carbohydrate, they develop severe pathologies
of vital organs. Liver, heart and testes exhibit extreme swelling, while
the pancreas atrophies, invariably leading to death of the rats before
maturity.
Sucrose is a disaccharide composed of 50 percent glucose and 50 percent
fructose. Dr. Fields repeated her experiments to determine whether it
was the glucose or fructose moiety that caused the harmful effects.
Starch breaks down into glucose when digested. On a copper-deficient
diet, the male rats showed some signs of copper deficiency, but not
the gross abnormalities of vital organs that occur in rats on the sucrose
diet. When the rats were fed fructose, the fatal organ abnormalities
occured.
Lysl oxidase is a copper-dependent enzyme that participates in the
formation of collagen and elastin. Fructose seems to interfere with
copper metabolism to such an extent that collagen and elastin cannot
form in growing animals--hence the hypertrophy of the heart and liver
in young males. The females did not develop these abnormalities, but
they resorbed their litters.1
These experiements should give us pause when we consider the great
increase in the use of high fructose corn syrup during the past 30 years,
particularly in soft drinks, fruit juices and other beverages aimed
at growing children, children increasingly likely to be copper deficient
as modern parents no longer serve liver to their families. (Liver is
by far the best source of copper in human diets.)
"The bodies of the children I see today are mush," observed
a concerned chiropractor recently. The culprit is the modern diet, high
in fructose and low in copper-containing foods, resulting in inadequate
formation of elastin and collagen--the sinews that hold the body together.
BINGEING ON FRUCTOSE
Until the 1970s most of the sugar we ate came from sucrose derived
from sugar beets or sugar cane. Then sugar from corn--corn syrup,
fructose, dextrose, dextrine and especially high fructose corn syrup
(HFCS)--began to gain popularity as a sweetener because it was much
less expensive to produce. High fructose corn syrup can be manipulated
to contain equal amounts of fructose and glucose, or up to 80 percent
fructose and 20 percent glucose.2 Thus, with almost twice
the fructose, HFCS delivers a double danger compared to sugar.
(With regards to fruit, the ratio is usually 50 percent glucose and
50 percent fructose, but most commercial fruit juices have HFCS added.
Fruit contains fiber which slows down the metabolism of fructose and
other sugars, but the fructose in HFCS is absorbed very quickly.)
In 1980 the average person ate 39 pounds of fructose and 84 pounds
of sucrose. In 1994 the average person ate 66 pounds of sucrose and
83 pounds of fructose, providing 19 percent of total caloric energy.3
Today approximately 25 percent of our average caloric intake comes from
sugars, with the larger fraction as fructose.4
High fructose corn syrup is extremely soluble and mixes well in many
foods. It is cheap to produce, sweet and easy to store. It’s used
in everything from bread to pasta sauces to bacon to beer as well as
in "health products" like protein bars and "natural"
sodas.
FRUCTOSE FOR DIABETICS?
In the past, fructose was considered beneficial to diabetics because
it is absorbed only 40 percent as quickly as glucose and causes only
a modest rise in blood sugar.5 However, research on other
hormonal factors suggests that fructose actually promotes disease more
readily than glucose. Glucose is metabolized in every cell in the body
but all fructose must be metabolized in the liver.6 The livers
of test animals fed large amounts of fructose develop fatty deposits
and cirrhosis, similar to problems that develop in the livers of alcoholics.
Pure fructose contains no enzymes, vitamins or minerals and robs the
body of its micronutrient treasures in order to assimilate itself for
physiological use.7 While naturally occurring sugars, as
well as sucrose, contain fructose bound to other sugars, high fructose
corn syrup contains a good deal of "free" or unbound fructose.
Research indicates that this free fructose interferes with the heart’s
use of key minerals like magnesium, copper and chromium. Among
other consequences, HFCS has been implicated in elevated blood cholesterol
levels and the creation of blood clots. It has been found to inhibit
the action of white blood cells so that they are unable to defend the
body against harmful foreign invaders.8
Studies on the Maillard reaction indicate that fructose may contribute
to diabetic complications more readily than glucose. The Maillard reaction
is a browning reaction that occurs when compounds are exposed to various
sugars. Fructose browns food seven times faster than glucose, resulting
in a decrease in protein quality and a toxicity of protein in the body.9
This is due to the loss of amino acid residues and decreased protein
digestibility. Maillard products can inhibit the uptake and metabolism
of free amino acids and other nutrients such as zinc, and some advanced
Maillard products have mutagenic and/or carcinogenic properties. The
Maillard reactions between proteins and fructose, glucose, and other
sugars may play a role in aging and in some clinical complications of
diabetes.10
Fructose reduces the affinity of insulin for its receptor, which is
the hallmark of type-2 diabetes. This is the first step for glucose
to enter a cell and be metabolized. As a result, the body needs to pump
out more insulin to handle the same amount of glucose.21
OTHER EFFECTS
Nancy Appleton, PhD, clinical nutritionist, has compiled a list of
the harmful effects of fructose in her books Lick the Sugar Habit,
Healthy Bones, Heal Yourself With Natural Foods, The Curse Of Louis
Pasteur and Lick the Sugar Habit Sugar Counter. She points out
that consumption of fructose causes a significant increase in the concentration
of uric acid; after ingestion of glucose, no significant change occurs.
An increase in uric acid can be an indicator of heart disease.12
Furthermore, fructose ingestion in humans results in increases in blood
lactic acid, especially in patients with preexisting acidotic conditions
such as diabetes, postoperative stress or uremia. Extreme elevations
cause metabolic acidosis and can result in death.13
Fructose is absorbed primarily in the jejunum before metabolism in
the liver. Fructose is converted to fatty acids by the liver at a greater
rate than is glucose.14 When consumed in excess of dietary
glucose, the liver cannot convert all of the excess fructose in the
system and it may be malabsorbed. The portion that escapes conversion
may be thrown out in the urine. Diarrhea can be a consequence.19
A study of 25 patients with functional bowel disease showed that pronounced
gastrointestinal distress may be provoked by malabsorption of small
amounts of fructose.26
Fructose interacts with oral contraceptives and elevates insulin levels
in women on "the pill."17
In studies with rats, fructose consistently produces higher kidney
calcium concentrations than glucose. Fructose generally induces greater
urinary concentrations of phosphorus and magnesium and lowered urinary
pH compared with glucose.18
In humans, fructose feeding leads to mineral losses, especially higher
fecal excretions of iron and magnesium, than did subjects fed sucrose.
Iron, magnesium, calcium, and zinc balances tended to be more negative
during the fructose-feeding period as compared to balances during the
sucrose-feeding period.19
There is significant evidence that high sucrose diets may alter intracellular
metabolism, which in turn facilitates accelerated aging through oxidative
damage. Scientists found that the rats given fructose had more undesirable
cross-linking changes in the collagen of their skin than in the other
groups. These changes are also thought to be markers for aging. The
scientists say that it is the fructose molecule in the sucrose, not
the glucose, that plays the larger part.20
Because it is metabolized by the liver, fructose does not cause the
pancreas to release insulin the way it normally does. Fructose converts
to fat more than any other sugar. This may be one of the reasons Americans
continue to get fatter. Fructose raises serum triglycerides significantly.
As a left-handed sugar, fructose digestion is very low. For complete
internal conversion of fructose into glucose and acetates, it must rob
ATP energy stores from the liver.21
Not only does fructose have more damaging effects in the presence
of copper deficiency, fructose also inhibits copper metabolism--another
example of the sweeteners double-whammy effect. A deficiency in copper
leads to bone fragility, anemia, defects of the connective tissue, arteries,
and bone, infertility, heart arrhythmias, high cholesterol levels, heart
attacks, and an inability to control blood sugar levels.22
Although these studies were not designed to test the effects of fructose
on weight gain, the observation of increased body weight associated
with fructose ingestion is of interest. One explanation for this observation
could be that fructose ingestion did not increase the production of
two hormones, insulin and leptin, that have key roles in the long-term
regulation of food intake and energy expenditure.23
HYPERSENSIVITY
The magnitude of the deleterious effects of fructose varies depending
on such factors as age, sex, baseline glucose, insulin, triglyceride
concentrations, the presence of insulin resistance, and the amount of
dietary fructose consumed.24 Some people are more sensitive
to fructose. They include hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic, hypertriglyceridemic,
non-insulin dependent diabetic people, people with functional bowel
disease and postmenopausal women.25
Everyone should avoid over-exposure to fructose, but especially those
listed above. One or two pieces of fruit per day is fine, but commercial
fruit juices and any products containing high fructose corn syrup aremore
dangerous than sugar and should be removed from the diet.
REFERENCES
1. Fields, M, Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology
and Medicine, 1984, 175:530-537.
2. Appleton, Nancy, PhD, Fructose is No Answer For a Sweetener, http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/carbs/1170.
3. Beatrice Trum Hunter, Confusing Consumers About Sugar Intake, Consumer’s
Research 78, no 1 (January 1995): 14-17.
4. Fallon, Sally and Mary Enig, Nourishing Traditions, New
Trends Publishing, Washington DC, 2001, p. 23.
5. Hallfrisch, Judith, Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fructose, FASEB
Journal 4 (June 1990): 2652-2660.
6. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2002
Vol. 76, No. 5, 911-922.
7. Appleton, Nancy Ph.D., Fructose is No Answer For a Sweetener, http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/carbs/1170.
8. http://www.mcvitamins.com/cornsyrup.htm.
9. H. F. Bunn and P. J. Higgins, Reaction of Nonosaccharides with
Proteins; Possible Evolutionary Significance, Science 213 (1981):2222-2244.
10. William L Dills Jr., Protein Fructosylation: Fructose and the
Maillard Reaction, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58
(suppl) (1993): 779S-787S.
11. Hunter.
12. J. MacDonald, Anne Keyser, and Deborah Pacy, Some Effects, in
Man, of Varying the Load of Glucose, Sucrose, Fructose, or Sorbitol
on Various Metabolites in Blood, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
31 (August 1978)): 1305-1311.
13. Hallfrisch, Judith, Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fructose, FASEB
Journal 4 (June 1990): 2652-2660.
14. D. Zakim and R. H. Herman, Fructose Metabolism II, American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 21: 315-319, 1968.
15. A. E. Bender and K. B. Damji, Some Effects of Dietary Sucrose,
World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 15 (1972): 104-155.
16. J. J. Rumessen and E. Gudmand-Hoyer, Functional Bowel Disease:
Malabsorption and Abdominal Distress After Ingestion of Fructose, Sorbitol,
and Fructose-Sorbitol Mixtures, Gastroenterology 95, no. 3
(September 1988): 694-700.
17. Hunter,Beatrice Trum,Confusing Consumers About Sugar Intake, Consumers’
Research 78, no 1 (January 1995): 14-17.
18. A. E. Bergstra, A. G. Lemmens, and A. C. Beynens, Dietary Fructose
vs. Glucose Stimulates Nephrocalcinogenesis in Female Rats, Journal
of Nutrition 123, no. 7 (July 1993): 1320-1327.
19. R. Ivaturi and C. Kies, Mineral Balances in Humans as Affected
by Fructose, High Fructose Corn Syrup and Sucrose, Plant Foods for
Human Nutrition 42, no. 2 (1992): 143-151.
20. Roger B. Mc Donald, Influence of Dietary Sucrose on Biological
Aging, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62 (suppl), (1995):
284s-293s.
21. H. Hallfrisch, et al.,The Effects of Fructose on Blood Lipid Levels,
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 37: 5, 1983, 740-748.
22. Klevay, Leslie, Acting Director of the U.S. Agriculture Department’s
Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, N.D.
23. Observation by Nancy Appleton, PhD.
24. Hollenbeck, Claire B., Dietary Fructose Effects on Lipoprotein
Metabolism and Risk for Coronary Artery Disease, American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition 58 (suppl), (1993): 800S-807S.
25. Appleton, Nancy Ph.D., Fructose is No Answer For a Sweetener,
http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/carbs/1170.
Sidebar Article
SOFT DRINKS IN THE SCHOOLS
High fructose corn syrup is the primary sweetener used in soft drinks,
now readily available to children in school vending machines. The soft
drink industry increased US production from 22 to 41 gallons of soft
drinks per person a year between 1970 and 1997.
Teenagers and children, the industry’s main tragets, are among
the largest consumers. In the past 10 years, soft drink consumption
among children has almost doubled in the United States. Teenage boys
now drink, on average, three or more cans of soda per day, and 10 percent
drink seven or more cans a day. The average for teenage girls is more
than two cans a day, and 10 percent drink more than five cans a day.
A typical 20-ounce Coke contains zero fat, zero protein and 67 grams
of carbohydrates, usually in the form of high fructose corn syrup.
There are an estimated 20,000 vending machines in schools nationwide,
according to the National Automatic Merchandising Association. The USDA
collected data on vending machines in schools and reported that 88 percent
of high schools, 61 percent of middle schools and 14 percent of elementary
schools have food or beverage vending machines for student use. Thirty-four
percent of high schools and 15 percent of middle schools permit students
to use school vending machines at any time, and 6 percent of elementary
schools allow students to use vending machines during lunch.
About the Author
Bill
Sanda, BS, MBA, served as Executive Director and Director of Public
Affairs for the Weston A. Price Foundation. Bill was a partner and co-owner of
The McAdam Group, a lobbying company specializing in elements of education policy,
and was a consultant to Primezyme, Inc., a nutrition and healing clinic. He has
extensive experience in Washington D.C. politics and government, having served
as a professional staff member in the US Senate.
<Back
| Home | Tour
| Calendar | Contact
Us | Funding | Join
Now
|