Read this in: NederlandsEspañol🖨️ Print post
Is coronavirus contagious? This is the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question. The premise that coronavirus is highly contagious and can cause disease has provided the justification for putting entire nations on lockdown, destroying the global economy and throwing hundreds of thousands out of work. From face masks to social distancing, from antivirals to vaccines, these measures are predicated on the assumption that tiny viruses can cause serious illness and that such illness is transmissible person-to-person. But is coronavirus contagious? Does it even cause disease?
As early as 1799, researchers puzzled over the cause of influenza, which appeared suddenly—often in diverse places at the same time—and could not be explained by any theory of contagion. In 1836, Heinrich Schweich, author of a book on influenza, noted that all physiological processes produce electricity and offered the theory that an electrical disturbance of the atmosphere may prevent the body from discharging it. He repeated the then-common belief that the accumulation of electricity in the body causes the symptoms of influenza and that outbreaks were due to atmospheric “influences”—hence the name influenza.
INFLUENZA AND ELECTRICITY
Since we know about the electrical nature of the sun, we can make some interesting observations. The years 1645-1715 were a period that astronomers call the Maunder minimum, when the sun was very quiet. Astronomers observed no sunspots during that time span, and the northern lights were nonexistent; then, in 1715, sunspots reappeared, as did the northern lights. Sunspot activity increased, reaching a high in 1727, and in 1728, influenza appeared in waves on every continent. Sunspot activities became more violent until they peaked in 1738, when physicians reported flu in both man and animals, including dogs, horses and birds, especially sparrows. By some estimates, two million people perished during the ten-year pandemic.
These and other facts about the relationship of influenza to disturbances in electricity come from a remarkable book, The Invisible Rainbow, by Arthur Firstenberg.1 Firstenberg chronicles the history of electricity in the U.S. and throughout the world, along with the outbreaks of illness that accompanied each step toward greater electrification. The first stage involved the installation of telegraph lines. By 1875, these formed a spider web over the whole earth totaling seven hundred thousand miles, with enough copper wire to encircle the globe almost thirty times. With it came a new disease called neurasthenia.
Outside the U.S., scientists recognized electricity as one of neurasthenia’s causes. Like those suffering today from “chronic fatigue,” patients felt weak, exhausted and unable to concentrate. They had headaches, dizziness, tinnitus, floaters in the eyes, a racing pulse, pains in the heart region and palpitations; they were depressed and had anxiety attacks. Dr. George Miller Beard noted that the disease spread along the routes of railroads and telegraph lines. It often resembled the common cold or influenza and usually seized people in the prime of life.
The year 1889 marked the beginning of the modern electrical era and also of a deadly flu pandemic, which followed the advent of electricity throughout the globe. Says Firstenberg, “Influenza struck explosively and unpredictably, over and over in waves until early 1894. It was as if something fundamental had changed in the atmosphere.” Physicians puzzled over influenza’s capricious spread. For example, William Beveridge, author of a 1975 textbook on influenza, noted: “The English warship Arachne was cruising off the coast of Cuba without any contact with land. No less than 114 men out of a crew of 149 fell ill with influenza and only later was it learnt that there had been outbreaks in Cuba at the same time.”1
During the First World War, governments on both sides of the conflict installed antennas that eventually blanketed the earth with strong radio signals. In 1918, disaster struck. The Spanish flu sickened an estimated five hundred million people—about one-third of the planet’s population—and killed as many as fifty million people, more than the Black Death of the fourteenth century. Those living on military bases, where the antennas were routinely installed, were the most vulnerable. A common symptom was bleeding—from the nostrils, the gums, ears, skin, stomach, intestines, uterus, kidneys and brain. Many died of hemorrhage in the lungs, the victims literally drowning in their own blood. Tests revealed a decreased ability for the blood to coagulate, possibly the result of flu patients receiving large doses of aspirin.
The year 1957 marked the installation of radar worldwide. The “Asian” influenza pandemic began in February 1957 and lasted for a year. A decade later, the U.S. launched twenty-eight satellites into the Van Allen belts as part of the Initial Defense Communication Satellite Program (IDCSP), ushering in the “Hong Kong” flu pandemic, which began in July 1968. As Firstenberg observes, “In each case—in 1889, 1918, 1957 and 1968—the electrical envelope of the earth. . . was suddenly and profoundly disturbed,” and along with it, the electrical circuits in the human body.
Western medicine pays scant attention to the electrical nature of living things—plants, animals and humans—but mountains of evidence indicate that faint currents govern everything that happens in the body to keep us alive and healthy. From the coagulation of the blood, to energy production in the mitochondria, even to small amounts of copper in the bones, which create currents for the maintenance of bone structure—all can be influenced by the presence of electricity in the atmosphere, and especially “dirty” electricity, which is characterized by many overlapping frequencies and jagged changes in frequency and voltage.
Chinese medicine has long recognized the electrical nature of the human body and has developed a system to defuse the “accumulation of electricity” that leads to disease. It’s called acupuncture. Many things that we do instinctively also help release any unhealthy buildup of current—the mother who strokes her infant’s head or who scratches her children’s backs to help them get to sleep, the caresses of lovers, barefoot walks, massages and even handshakes and hugs—all now sternly discouraged by health authorities2 as we face the specter of police bursting in at night to make sure that Dad is sleeping on the couch.
Am I making this up? The Washington Post recently published an article in which a mother was explaining to her teenage son why she couldn’t hug him during quarantine; and a World Health Organization (WHO) official suggests that public health officials should enter people’s homes and “in a dignified way” remove those who test positive to prevent infecting the rest of the family.3
Fast forward to the Internet and cell phone era. According to Firstenberg, the onset of cell phone service in 1996 resulted in greater levels of mortality in major cities like Los Angeles, New York, San Diego and Boston. Over the years, wireless signals at multiple frequencies have filled the atmosphere to a greater and greater extent, along with mysterious outbreaks like SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome).
5G ROLLOUT AND COVID-19
On September 26, 2019, Wuhan, China turned on fifth generation (5G) wireless and officially launched 5G on November 1, with a grid of about ten thousand antennas—more antennas than exist in the whole U.S.—all concentrated in one city. Soon we began hearing about a strange new illness coming from this highly industrialized location. A spike in cases also occurred on February thirteenth, the same week that Wuhan turned on its 5G network for monitoring traffic.
Illness has followed 5G installation in all the major cities in America, starting with New York in the fall of 2019—in uptown, midtown and downtown Manhattan, along with parts of Brooklyn, the Bronx and Queens—all of which became subsequent coronavirus hot spots. Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Dallas, Cleveland and Atlanta soon followed, with some five thousand towns and cities now covered.
Europeans have also seen a strong correlation with 5G rollout. Bartomeu Payeras i Cifre, a Spanish epidemiologist, has charted the rollout of 5G in European cities and countries with cases per thousand people. His analysis demonstrates “a clear and close relationship between the rate of coronavirus infections and 5G antenna location.”4 For example, the city of Milan and other areas in the northern part of the country have the densest 5G coverage, not Rome. Even though the major airport in Italy is in Rome, northern Italy has twenty-two times the number of coronavirus cases. In Switzerland, telecommunications companies have built out more than two thousand antennas, but the Swiss have halted at least some of the 5G rollout due to health concerns. Per capita, Switzerland has had far fewer coronavirus cases than the nearby countries of France, Spain and Germany, where 5G is going full steam ahead. Of particular note is the small country of San Marino, the first country in the world to install 5G (in September 2018). Its citizens have had the longest exposure to 5G and the highest coronavirus infection rate—four times higher than Italy (which deployed 5G in June 2019), and twenty-seven times higher than Croatia, which has not deployed 5G. In rural areas, the illness blamed on coronavirus is slight to non-existent.
Iran announced in February 2020 that it “had carried out all preparations needed for launching the 5G network” and had completed its expansion of related 4G-LTE infrastructure “to almost all cities, towns and villages across the country.”5 The first Covid-19 cases there correlate with this announcement.6 Korea has installed over seventy thousand 5G bases and, by mid-March, had reported over eight thousand cases of illness. Japan began testing 5G in tunnels in Hokkaido in early February 2020, and this city now has the most cases of coronavirus in Japan—even more than Tokyo.
In South America, the 5G rollout has occurred in Brazil, Chile and Ecuador, and in Mexico, all of which have many coronavirus cases. Countries without 5G (such as Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana and Paraguay) have not reported any cases, even though sanitation in these countries is likely more primitive. Paraguay is doing what all countries should do—building a national fiber optics network without resorting to 5G.
The 5G system has also been installed on modern cruise ships and in many health care facilities. In addition, health care facilities bristle with electronic equipment, some of it located right by the heads of very sick patients. People who suffer from electrical sensitivity cannot go near many hospitals and nursing homes.
A SOUP OF 4G AND 5G FREQUENCIES
5G broadcasts in a range of microwave frequencies (24-72 GHz). Frequencies in this range (below the frequency of light) are called non-ionizing, in contrast to ionizing radiation, which has a higher frequency than visible light (see Figure 1). Ionizing radiation, such as x-rays, causes electrons to split off atoms (obviously something to which one should limit one’s exposure). Instead of producing charged ions when passing through matter, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation changes the rotational, vibrational or electronic valence configurations of molecules and atoms. This produces thermal effects—think microwave ovens—but also well-documented non-thermal effects.7
While the telecommunications industry flatly denies any non-thermal effects on living tissue, a large body of research suggests considerable harm to the delicate electromagnetic systems in the human body from constant exposure to non-ionizing frequencies—headaches, tinnitus, fatigue, rashes and even cancer. In particular, high-frequency electromagnetic fields like 5G affect cell membrane permeability—not a good thing when the architecture of a healthy cell ensures that it is not permeable except in controlled situations.8
The fact that some 5G transmitters broadcast at 60 GHz is of particular concern. According to telecommunications industry literature, this frequency is highly absorbed by oxygen,9 causing the O2 molecule to split apart and making it useless for respiration. Think about the implications of oxygen that doesn’t work to support life! Also of interest is the U.S. military’s possession of crowd control devices that operate in the ranges of 6-100 GHz. The military’s 95 GHz Active Denial System can penetrate the skin and produce intolerable heating sensations, causing people to move away from the beam.
The technological changes converging to build out 5G networks include a massive “densification” of 4G networks as well as expansion into the millimeter wave frequency bands, particularly (in the case of the latter) in urban areas.10 Millimeter waves go only a short distance and cannot penetrate buildings. In response, a few tech startups are working to get the 5G signal into the areas where we work, play and sleep. For example, Pivotal Commware is testing an “Echo 5G In-Building Penetration Device.”11 Pivotal’s offices are about one mile from the Life Care nursing home in Kirkland, Washington, where the illness first appeared in the U.S., and where twenty-five residents died. Was the Life Care center a de facto testing ground for Pivotal’s new device?
Let’s consider some of the symptoms reported in connection with Covid-19. Guidelines published in 2016 by EUROPAEM EMF, a nonprofit watchdog organization, state that “there is strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, and male infertility.” Describing common symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (also called microwave illness), the authors cite “headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms [emphasis added].”12
A study published in Oncology Journal describes lung injury from radiation therapy. Radiation therapy uses shorter waves at close range for a shorter period of time. It stands to reason that 5G millimeter waves—with 4G transmitters nearby pulsing massive amounts of frequency day and night—could also cause lung injury. According to the study’s authors, “Depending on the dose and volume of lung irradiated, acute radiation pneumonitis may develop, characterized by dry cough and dyspnea (shortness of breath).”13
Another coronavirus symptom: fizzing. According to the New York Post, many Covid-19 patients report strange buzzing sensations throughout their body, “an electric feeling on the skin” or skin that feels like it is burning.14 Those who are electrically sensitive report similar sensations when they get near a cell phone or use GPS-guided cruise control in their cars. Other reported coronavirus symptoms include a loss of smell and taste,15 fever, aches, breathlessness, fatigue, a dry cough,16 diarrhea,17 strokes and seizures18—all symptoms documented by those who are electrically sensitive.
The correlation of the 5G rollout and Covid-19 cases—and the similarity of symptoms—should give us pause. Shouldn’t we be looking more closely before we institute mandatory vaccination and electronic ID chipping? Shouldn’t we test to see whether a contagious virus is even involved before we order social distancing and prescribe face masks?
THE LEGACY OF PASTEUR
With the invention of the microscope in 1670 and the discovery of bacteria, doctors found a convenient explanation for disease: tiny one-celled organisms that humans can presumably pass from one to another through contact and exhalation. This theory took hold thanks to celebrity scientist Louis Pasteur.
It was Pasteur who convinced a skeptical medical community that contagious germs cause disease; his “germ theory” soon became and still serves as the official explanation for most illness. However, in his private diaries, he stated unequivocally that in his entire career he was not once able to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria (and he obviously wasn’t able to purify viruses at that time). In fact, the only way he could transfer disease was to either insert the whole infected tissues into another animal—he would sometimes inject ground-up brains of an animal into the brain of another animal to “prove” contagion—or resort to adding poisons to his culture, which he knew would cause symptoms in the recipients.
Eventually, Pasteur admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous deathbed confession that “the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.”19 In other words, microbes may be associated with diseases but they do not cause them; the cause is always something that has upset the natural order of nature, such as nutrient deficiencies, toxins, bad air, filthy water, electromagnetic radiation or even the emotions of fear and despair.
Recognition of nutritional deficiencies as a cause of diseases like scurvy, pellagra and beriberi took decades because the germ theory became the explanation for everything that ails the human being. As Robert R. Williams, one of the discoverers of thiamine (vitamin B1), lamented, “all young physicians were so imbued with the idea of infection as the cause of disease that it presently came to be accepted as almost axiomatic that disease could have no other cause [than microbes]. The pre-occupation of physicians with infection as a cause of disease was doubtless responsible for many digressions from attention to food as the causal factor of beriberi.”20
During the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918—the deadliest example of a global contagion in history—doctors struggled to explain the worldwide reach of the illness. It seemed to appear spontaneously in different parts of the world, striking the young and healthy, including (as previously mentioned) many American servicemen. Some communities shut down schools, businesses and theaters; people were ordered to wear masks and refrain from kissing their babies to stop the contagion.
But was it contagious? At the time, health officials believed that a microorganism called Pfeiffer’s bacillus caused the Spanish flu, and they were very interested in understanding how the organism could spread so quickly—and so randomly. To answer that question, doctors from the U.S. Public Health Service tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five by collecting mucous secretions from the noses, throats and upper respiratory tracts of those who were sick. The doctors then transferred these secretions to the noses, mouths and lungs of the volunteers, but not one of them succumbed. Even when blood from sick donors was injected into the blood of the volunteers, they remained stubbornly healthy.
Finally, the doctors instructed those afflicted with the flu to breathe and cough over the healthy volunteers, but none became sick. Researchers even tried to infect healthy horses with the mucous secretions of horses with the flu—yes, many animals became ill during the pandemic—but the results were the same. The Spanish flu was not contagious,21,22 and physicians could attach no blame to the accused bacterium nor provide an explanation for its global reach.
In recent years, we have witnessed a complete reversal of the reigning medical paradigm, which claims that bacteria attack and sicken us. Indeed, researchers have become increasingly frustrated in their attempts to prove that bacteria make us sick, except as co-actors in extremely unnatural conditions. We have learned that the digestive tract contains up to six pounds of bacteria, which play many beneficial roles—they protect us against toxins, support the immune system, help digest our food, create vitamins and even produce feel-good chemicals. Bacteria that coat the skin and line the vaginal tract play equally protective roles. Bacteria permeate the soil to make plant growth possible. These discoveries call into question many current medical practices, from antibiotics to herbicides to hand sanitizing.
ENTER THE VIRUS
When Louis Pasteur was unable to find a bacterium that could cause rabies, he speculated about a pathogen too small for detection by microscopes. These tiny particles—about one-hundredth the size of a cell—became visible with the invention of the electron microscope in 1931. Scientists assumed that they were bad for us—“dangerous infectious agents”—and named them viruses, the Latin word for “toxins.”
Because viruses are always seen in and around living cells, researchers surmised that viruses replicate only inside the living cells of an organism—they do not divide like cells do. Scientists today operate on the assumption that these ubiquitous viruses can infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria. Difficult to separate and purify, viruses have become a convenient scapegoat for diseases that don’t fit the bacterial model. Colds, flu and pneumonia—once considered exclusively bacterial diseases—are now frequently blamed on a virus.
Is it possible that scientists will one day discover that these particles, like the once-maligned bacteria, play a beneficial role? Indeed, scientists have already done just that. However, old ideas—and especially the “one bug, one drug” mentality that promises profits from drugs and vaccines—die hard.
KOCH AND RIVERS
Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) is considered one of the founders of modern bacteriology, having created and improved laboratory technologies for isolating bacteria. His research led to the formulation of what are called Koch’s postulates, a series of four principles linking specific microorganisms to specific diseases.
The postulates are as follows:
- The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
- The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in a pure culture.
- The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
- The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated (now diseased) experimental host and identified as identical to the original specific causative agent.
If all four conditions are met, one has proven the infectious cause for a specific set of symptoms. Significantly, however, even Koch could not find proof of contagion using his own postulates! In fact, he had to abandon the requirement of the first postulate when he discovered carriers of cholera and typhoid fever who did not get sick. Although he claimed to have proven that a bacterium causes tuberculosis (TB), a careful reading of his work (very difficult to obtain in English) shows that he did not satisfy even one of his four postulates for TB.
Koch developed his postulates for bacteria, not for viruses. In 1937, Thomas M. Rivers modified Koch’s postulates in order to determine the infectious nature of viruses.23 Rivers’ postulates stated:
- The virus could be isolated from diseased hosts.
- The virus could be cultivated in host cells.
- The virus could be filtered from a medium that also contained bacteria (proof of filterability).
- The filtered virus would produce a comparable disease when the cultivated virus was used to infect experimental animals.
- The virus could be re-isolated from the infected experimental animal.
- A specific immune response to the virus could be detected.
Note that Rivers dropped Koch’s first postulate—that’s because many people suffering from “viral” illness do not harbor the offending microorganism. Even with Koch’s first postulate missing, however, researchers have never been able to prove that a specific virus causes a specific disease using Rivers’ postulates.
WHAT SCIENTISTS IN WUHAN DID NOT DO
Sometime in late 2019, authorities in China noticed that a group of people were getting sick in a new way. Because the symptoms of the sick people resembled those of pneumonia, some of the original ill patients were given antibiotics. When the patients didn’t improve with antibiotic therapy, doctors concluded that this new type of pneumonia must be caused by a new type of virus.
As soon as the Chinese medical authorities suspected an outbreak of a new and dangerous viral disease, they should have taken steps to satisfy the Rivers’ postulates. The first step would have entailed collecting some five hundred people from Wuhan with the identical (or at least nearly identical) symptoms and finding five hundred symptom-free matched controls (people of similar age, lifestyle, disease profile and so forth), also from Wuhan. Given the possible slow development of this illness, it would also have been prudent to follow the five hundred controls for a few months to make sure that none developed the new symptoms.
The next step would have been to do a thorough microbiological examination of a variety of fluids taken from the one thousand subjects. At a minimum, this should have included blood, sputum, urine and nasal swabs. The study should have used both conventional light microscopy (to look for bacteria) and electron microscopy (to look for viruses). If the investigators went on to find a novel bacterium or virus in all of the sick people and in none of the well people, they then should have meticulously isolated, purified and cultured the bacterium or virus in a neutral medium. After accomplishing this purification step, the purified microbe should have been introduced into test animals, using the normal route by which the microbe could spread (and not, for example, injecting it directly into the brain of the animal, as was done to “prove” the contagious etiology of polio). Finally, such studies would of course require a control group of test animals; in other words, if researchers are going to spray purified virus into animals’ nostrils to see if they get sick, they also need to spray pure saline into the nostrils of a control group of animals to make sure the animals are not getting sick just because stuff is being sprayed up their noses.
Any sane person would agree that such research ought to have been a requirement before taking draconian worldwide measures to “stop the spread” or “flatten the curve.” And, if medical authorities in China were unable to carry out this type of investigation, they should have enlisted the help of the CDC in the U.S. and the equivalent organizations in Europe and Russia, or the WHO, to make sure the investigations were done carefully, properly and thoroughly. Isn’t this what science is supposed to be all about?
What the public doesn’t realize is that for Covid-19—and also for the last dozen or so “viral” epidemics we have faced, including AIDS, SARS, Ebola, Zika, bird flu, hepatitis C and others—scientists have not attempted to demonstrate even a single part of Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates.
Actually, for Covid-19, the Chinese did try. They took some respiratory secretions from some sick people; that is, they took sputum from people with a cough. They then centrifuged the sputum to separate out the liquid part from the cellular part, which presumably contained the virus. Next, they took this centrifuged, unpurified sediment from sick people and inoculated that into lung cancer cells. Then they centrifuged this mess again, not even attempting to purify any virus from the mixture. Finally, they took this witch’s brew of snot sediment, lung cancer cells and who-knows-what-else and injected that into two unfortunate monkeys. They didn’t do a control group, such as injecting saline, or injecting lung cancer cells, or even injecting the liquid supernatant from the centrifuged material into a control group of monkeys. Instead, the two experimental monkeys just got the unpurified, cellular-debris-laden goop. One of the monkeys got pneumonia, and the other got a rash.24 In a related study, the Chinese scientists took unpurified, lung-cancer-grown, centrifuged snot and squirted it down the throats and into the lungs of a group of hamsters. Some (but not all) of the hamsters got pneumonia, and some even died. We have no idea what would have happened if they had squirted plain lung cancer cells into the lungs of these hamsters; probably not anything good. Most perplexing is the fact that some of the hamsters didn’t get sick—which doesn’t square with the “deadly contagious virus” theory at all.25
In short, none of the studies carried out to date has provided any semblance of proof that we are dealing with a deadly viral disease. The fact that illness appears in clusters may seem to call for “contagion” as an explanation, but an equally appropriate explanation is not the germ but the terrain. Which environmental factors are affecting many people in the same place at the same time? One obvious candidate is electromagnetic pollution.
It’s interesting to note that over the decades, each wave of influenza has had its own constellation of symptoms. During the Spanish flu epidemic, the main problem was bleeding—the inability of the blood to coagulate—and the main victims were healthy people in the prime of life (between the ages of twenty-five and forty). Today’s victims are older, usually with pre-existing conditions, and the main symptoms seem to be hypoxia, akin to high-altitude sickness
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, working on the front lines in a New York City hospital, made a video explaining what he has observed.26 Says Kyle-Sidell, “We’ve never seen anything like it!” The afflicted are literally gasping for air. In fact, the ventilators that the hospitals have scrambled to obtain do more harm than good and may be accounting for the high mortality rate. These patients don’t need help breathing—they need more oxygen when they take a breath. What Kyle-Sidell describes is not the sign of a contagious disease but of a disruption of our mechanisms for producing energy and getting oxygen to the red blood cells.
THANK GOODNESS FOR EXOSOMES
We are indebted to Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who has posted a number of interesting videos online in which he explains that viruses are actually exosomes,27-30 a conclusion shared by a number of other virologists. Viruses and exosomes are the same size, the same shape, both carry RNA and both attach to the same receptors. These tiny particles do not attack our cells; quite the contrary, exosomes are particles that are released from the cell (see Figure 2). In addition to carrying RNA, exosomes encapsulate toxins and cellular debris in response to various insults—toxins, stress (including fear), cancer, ionizing radiation, infection, injury, many diseases, immune response and asthma. In short, these exosomes/viruses are the result and not the cause of illness, and they play primary roles in coagulation, intercellular signaling and excretion of waste materials.
So, is a nasty little creature called coronavirus infecting us and making us sick? Remember that researchers could not show that the dreadful Spanish flu was contagious. The fact that viruses are actually helpful exosomes, and that many individuals who test positive for coronavirus are symptom-free, makes their role as a perpetrator highly unlikely. To settle this question once and for all, we need to do the same contagion studies that proved non-contagion in 1918.
If you do a bit of surfing on the Internet, you will find that exosomes are the latest thing for diagnosis and therapy, with many medical uses—from cancer treatment, to wound healing, to hair restoration! If 5G, by overloading the body’s electrical circuitry and hijacking oxygen, causes injury to the lung cells, then an increased production of exosomes (wrongly called viruses) is sure to be the result—and thank goodness! It is no wonder that the antiviral medications given in the early days of the pandemic—but now largely abandoned—caused such terrible side effects, including allergic reactions, fever, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, diabetic lactic acidosis, damage to the kidneys, liver and pancreas. . . and breathing problems. These drugs were suppressing the body’s efforts to protect itself against the poisonous effects of 5G and other toxins.
It’s clear that we are making the same mistake with viruses that we have made with cholesterol and saturated fat—blaming a substance that is essential to life for causing disease. Just twenty years ago, the medical profession “knew” that bacteria were killers—now we recognize that bacteria are essential to health. How long will it take us to learn that so-called viruses are our friends?
Humankind has lived for thousands of years with our brains tuned to the Schumann resonances of the earth, our bodies and indeed all life—bathed in a static electric field of one hundred thirty volts per meter. The electric symphony that gives us life is soft and delicate. Minute electrical currents that course through leaf veins or through the glial cells in our nervous system guide the growth and metabolism of all life forms. Our cells communicate in whispers in the radiofrequency range. Today, this quiet hum of life-giving current is deafened by a jangle of overlapping and jarring frequencies—from power lines to the fridge to the cell phone—and now the final assault, 5G.
Fortunately, cells under assault produce the toxin-gobbling messengers called exosomes that help us adjust to environmental threats, including electrosmog. These tiny messengers provide real-time and rapid genetic adaptation to environmental changes. After all, most people have adjusted to worldwide radio waves, electricity in our homes and ubiquitous Wi-Fi. . . and there were thirty-five sailors on the battleship Arachne who did not get sick! Even the sparrow population rebounded after the flu of 1738. It is exosomes that allowed these adjustments to happen. Whether these exosomes can help us adapt to the extreme disruption of 5G remains to be seen.
PROTECT AGAINST EMFs WITH FOOD
While your best protection against EMFs is to reduce exposure, especially to 5G emitters, the Wise Traditions diet can go a long way toward protecting you against the cacophony of EMF frequencies that surround us.
SATURATED ANIMAL FATS. Electromagnetic frequencies, especially those for 5G, increase the permeability of the cell membrane, which can then lead to all sorts of unfortunate consequences—from fatigue to cancer. The first and foremost requirement for cell membranes that are impervious and secure is saturated fat. At least 50 percent of the fat molecules in the cell membrane should be saturated, and the fats in our lung surfactants should be 100 percent saturated for the lungs to work properly. Saturated animal fats also supply cholesterol, needed in the cell membranes to ensure that the cells are waterproof (and thus have a different electric potential on the inside and outside of the cell). Another important compound we get from animal fats is arachidonic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid required for tight cell-to-cell junctures. So, eat the fat on your meat, cook in lard or bacon fat and use plenty of butter!
THE FAT-SOLUBLE VITAMINS. The trio of vitamins A, D and K2 work together to protect us against toxins and enhance the immune system. Best sources are cod liver oil, egg yolks from pastured hens, butter from grass-fed cows, fish eggs, lard from pigs raised outdoors, poultry fat and poultry liver.
GELATIN-RICH BONE BROTH. The glycine in bone broth helps maintain structured water both inside and outside the cell; helps create strong cartilage in the lung surfactants and throughout the body; and supports the body’s detoxification mechanisms. Be sure to make broth with organic or grass-fed bones, free of glyphosate (the main ingredient in the herbicide Roundup).
VITAMIN C. Successful treatments for the current type of respiratory illness include vitamin C. Your best food source is fermented vegetables like sauerkraut—there is ten times more vitamin C in sauerkraut than in fresh cabbage!
IRON, ZINC AND SULFUR. Iron is an element that is vulnerable to electromagnetism. Vitamin A helps ensure that iron goes into the red blood cells where it is needed. Both zinc and sulfur supplementation seem to help Covid-19 patients. The best sources are animal foods like red meat, liver, oysters and egg yolks.
RAW MILK. One effect of 5G seems to be the stimulation of calcium channels in the cell membrane. This drives calcium into the cell, essentially poisoning the cell, while lowering the ionized calcium in the blood used in the coagulation pathways to help clotting and prevent uncontrolled bleeding. If the ionized calcium in the blood drops too low, people hemorrhage and die. During the 1918 pandemic, many doctors noted that their patients died from hemorrhage, not from pneumonia as one would expect. Some doctors reported that the use of intravenous calcium lactate kept people from dying. Soon after, Royal Lee from Standard Process formulated a flu product called Congaplex, which contained calcium lactate—the same form of readily available calcium as in raw milk. In addition, raw whole milk from pastured cows contains many compounds that strengthen our ability to deal with toxins.
THE CONTAGION MYTH
BANNED ON AMAZON!
We are sad to announce that our new book, The Contagion Myth, is banned on Amazon—sad for what has happened to American freedom of expression. But Amazon’s actions tell us that we have already struck a nerve and the powers that be do not want the paradigm-busting information in our book to circulate.
Amazon will be refunding your money or not charging you if you pre-ordered on their site. However, you have many choices for ordering the book online at:
Thank you for your patience!
Thomas S. Cowan, MD
Sally Fallon Morell
- Firstenberg A. The Invisible Rainbow. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2017.
- Perper R. Fauci says people should “just forget about shaking hands” even after the coronavirus threat is over. Business Insider, April 8, 2020.
- WHO official: It’s time to remove people from their homes & COVID Task Force admits inflated numbers. April 11, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJ5Xo3NAUE0.
- Payeras I Cifre B. Study of the correlation between cases of coronavirus and the presence of 5G networks. March-April 2020. https://www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Study-of-correlation-coronavirus-5G-Bartomeu-Payeras-i-Cifre.pdf.
- Iran finishes preparations to launch 5G internet: Minister. MSN, February 13, 2020. https://www.msn.com/en-xl/middleeast/top-stories/iran-finishes-preparations-to-launch-5g-internet-minister/ar-BBZYXjB.
- Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I et al. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: an international perspective. Environ Pollut 2018;242(Pt A):643-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019.
- Meijer DKF, Timmer J, Geesink HJH. The 5G safety dilemma: plea for urgent scientific research in the European context. Preprint, April 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340528995_The_5G_ Safety_Dilemma_Plea_for_Urgent_Scientific_Research_in_the_European_Context.
- Hakusui S. Wireless at 60 GHz has unique oxygen absorption properties. April 10, 2001. https://scientists4wiredtech.com/wireless-at-60-ghz-has-unique-oxygen-absorption-properties/.
- Children’s Health Defense. Sounding the alarm about wireless radiation and 5G. December 20, 2019. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/sounding-the-alarm-about-wireless-radiation-and-5g/.
- Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health 2016;31(3):363-97. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0011.
- Robnett TJ, Machtay M, Vines EF et al. Factors predicting severe radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:89-94.
- Steussy L. Coronavirus patients report strange new symptom: “Fizzing.” New York Post, April 10, 2020.
- Brown L. Loss of taste and smell could be crucial symptoms of coronavirus. New York Post, March 22, 2020.
- Steussy L. Coronavirus symptoms: What’s the difference between a dry and wet cough? New York Post, March 6, 2020.
- Salo J. Digestive issues could be first symptom of coronavirus, study says. New York Post, March 19, 2020.
- Stimson B. Small percentage of coronavirus patients exhibit neurological symptoms. New York Post, April 2, 2020.
- Engelbrecht T, Köhnlein C. Virus Mania. Trafford Publishing, 2007 (first English edition).
- Williams R. Toward the Conquest of Beriberi. Harvard University Press, 1961, p. 18. Cited in Engelbrecht T and Köhnlein C, Virus Mania. Trafford Publishing, 2007 (first English edition).
- Rosenau MJ. Experiments to determine mode of spread of influenza. JAMA 1919;73(5):311-3.
- Leake JP. Meeting of the Section of Medicine, June 3, 1919: the transmission of influenza. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, December 11, 1919;181:675-9. https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM191912111812401.
- Rivers TM. Viruses and Koch’s postulates. J Bacteriol 1937;33(1):1-12.
- Andrew Kaufman, MD, The Rooster in the River of Rats; https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/episodes-medicamentum-authentica/.
- Andrew Kaufman, MD, The Rooster in the River of Rats; https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/episodes-medicamentum-authentica/.
- Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell. Must-watch – NY ICU whistleblower – Dr Cameron Kyle Sidell. April 5, 2020. https://www.bitchute.com/video/yOujZziRjO7T/.
- Dr. Andrew Kaufman. Special Report: Humanity is NOT a virus! March 31, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGGd7-vvd9Y&feature=youtu.be.
- Dr. Andrew Kaufman. What is coronavirus, pandemic paranoia facts, fictions and fears interview. April 10, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvEeEZTD4pE&feature=youtu.be.
- Dr. Andrew Kaufman. The rooster in the river of rats. April 19, 2020.
- Dr. Andrew Kaufman. The real science of germs: do viruses cause disease? May 1, 2020. https://www.bitchute.com/video/TORel19zI2A2/.
This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Summer 2020🖨️ Print post
Read this in: NederlandsEspañol
Chef-doctor Jemichel says
So great to have this enlightening article now online so it could possibly “go viral”!
Unfortunately the video at reference 29 has been removed at You Tube claiming: “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.” (I think there may be an alternate site and if so will return here with that.) I read the YouTube statement as an indication that this video ranks higher in revealing important information!
Chef-doctor Jemichel says
P.S. Is this the same video?:
Bitchute is an alternative to YouTube that doesn’t censor…
In addition to Bitchute…Rumble, Telegram, Parler, Gab — all platforms that don’t censor.
Chef-doctor Jemichel says
P.P.S. Just recovered a censored and banned science paper on this subject:
Martin Huber says
Dear Chef-doctor Jermichel
Many thanks for upload 🙂
Maureen Diaz says
Thank you so much for providing this!
Esther Biggs says
What an eye opener and mind blowing article!
may I add raw milk contain lactoferrin latest studies found to CURE covid19:
study 1: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04421534
study 2: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340464937_Lactoferrin_as_potential_preventative_and_treatment_for_COVID-19
study 3: https://ijrhs.org/article/2020/8/1/105530ijrhs813
thank you for your very interesting article
Martin Huber says
Very interesting article
It sounds very sensible because every material is influenced by the magnetic field of Mother Earth.
The so called dielectric constant of every stuff included living creatures as a whole is clearly measurable. Mother Nature far away from modern times worked out every living creature out of this natural magnetic field. The theory due disturbing the given natural field by any synthetic electromagnetic frequencies leads to illness and more particular to the decrease or shut down of our immune system makes really sense to me.
I am very upset about the fact that profit at all costs stands above and beyond the health and sanity of customers. From a scientific and my personal point of view the 5G network could be or better is extremely dangerous as long as there is no evidence, by serious long term studies, that it isn’t!
Bruce Raymaker says
Sally, you are a marvel. Thank you for pulling all that together and giving us your insights. God bless you!
Vicki Sievers says
The most valuable article I’ve read about contagion. Now to consider how to share with friends for whom this would be an un-embraceable leap.
Dorothee Filbinger-Maier says
Interesting article, however New Zealand did not have any new cases of corona virus in weeks and has an extensive 5G network. How do you reconcile this?
Jessica Lovelady says
I was wondering about this too. My mother lives in Okinawa in an area that does not have 5G, yet people are getting infected there.
I am also wondering why the article is emphasizing the lack of scientific proof to prove that viruses are contagious, yet neglects to share any scientific evidence about the effects of electricity on the body other than stating possible correlations of events with out breaks . I do not doubt that the terrain is a factor in illness, but there is a factor that is causing some bodies to act in dysfunctional ways that do not effect all people who have the same or similar environmental, physical, or emotional stress conditions. There are some serious holes in this argument that make this view very dangerous when not being able to provide any strong scientific evidence.
Jessica – Good reflections on this article and I too felt it was too narrow in what it was trying to promote as a single cause issue. Sorry to say I kind of stopped reading when I got to this sentence in the text ‘Japan began testing 5G in tunnels in Hokkaido in early February 2020, and this city now has the most cases of coronavirus in Japan—even more than Tokyo.’ Because Hokkaido is a large island, not a city, and it has never had more cases than Tokyo, but has tested far more than Tokyo where it’s been very hard to get tested all along. so these clear inaccuracies/clumsy claims made it difficult to continue reading as it made me wonder what else is inaccurate here?
The conflagration of disparate facts to make a scientific argument is dangerous. I thought this group would have fact-based information but alas find the call to do research on our own on the internet another way of discounting science and peer reviewed studies.
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally – Yes, are the “cases” due to more testing or more exposure to 5G? It does seem that Hokkaido has more cases than other parts of Japan (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-52305055)
Tim Boyd says
REPLY from Sallly: It would be good to look into Okinawa more, but what we need to know is whether these “infections” are people who tested positive or who actually became sick with the symptoms (clotting, lack of oxygen, fizzing feeling and degeneration of the lungs.) Here in the U.S., they are counting those who tested positive as “cases” when the test means nothing at all.
By the way, 5G was recently tested in a baseball stadium in Okinawa: (https://news.samsung.com/global/kddi-and-samsung-successfully-complete-5g-multi-device-trial-at-a-professional-baseball-stadium-in-okinawa-japan). And it looks like Japan is installing 5G at stop lights nationwide (which would include Okinawa.) Just because you don’t see it on maps does not mean it isn’t there in certain spots. (https://resources.realestate.co.jp/living/5g-in-japan-govt-to-allow-5g-base-stations-to-be-installed-on-200000-traffic-lights-nationwide/)
there is also 5G satellites beeming down. further reading on EMFs is The BIoinitiative report 2012 with scientific evidence
Jonathan Nielsen says
This is easy to answer. “Covid-19” isn’t caused solely by one thing, such as 5G non-ionizing radiation. It’s a label given to illnesses popping up around the world caused by 5G and other things as well.
Also, many “cases” are false positives from the PCR test, which is a proven fraud not able to determine what the person actually has. It could be any number of things causing a positive result.
Going by official case numbers or deaths is a big mistake. It’s all anti-science fraud around the world pushed for a political agenda. The virus is made up and those at the top know it.
I think the author has partly assumed there is no need to validate electricity as having an impact on the body, as it is already well-known. For instance, we start hearts using electricity. We can use our bodies to complete a circuit, and electricity is attracted to us. So, the idea does not need proving.
I can’t see how writing ideas can be dangerous here. It seems more dangerous to go along with 5G, masks, business closures, lost jobs and psychological issues, suicide, etc with no proof of contagion or usefulness of those interventions, than to present some ideas.
may not be turned on. they can adjust frequency,
modulation, you don’t know what it is emitting,
EMF is invisible
Martha Ray Barger says
Wondering if 5G + population density are factors like they are with those with EMF sensitivity.
Diane Ives says
Great article. I could hardly put it down. People really need this information, I hope it can get the exposure it deserves.
A Comstock says
There is definitely some food for thought in this article. But it is also chocked full for irrational, illogical “reasoning.”
The questioning of contagion for instance. The author claims that disease is caused by environmental factors and not by viruses or microbes. I would like an explanation of why contact tracing works. You can find a chain of contagion through PEOPLE. Not places.
Then there is the whole New Zealand thing with their 5G networks and ZERO new cases in over 100 days now.
Also not accounted for, places were people don’t want to wear masks have higher illness percentages. Like Florida and other red states.
Waaaaaayyyyyyy too many logical fallicies in this article for it to go ‘viral’. It would get ripped to shreds by people. And then the doctors will pile in after debunking some of the ridiculous claims.
Patricia Boley says
As a scientist, I agree with you. This article is highly disppointing to me as someone who studies coronaviruses for years before they were in the news. Correlation is not causation is one of the first rules broken here…you highlighted many more. We have proof through genomic sequencing and analysis. How can that be refuted?
The effects of millimeter wave radiation are known and well documented. Some 2 decades of studies exist. I agree Sally takes great liberties with the scientific facts in making her case, for instance at the basic level, the symptoms are totally different. But there is a solid case from a healthcare perspective that we should all have strong reservations about 5G. Yet for everyone touting themselves as the voice of healthcare science, nobody is making the healthcare case. So we can at least appreciate that Sally is doing a bad job at something the professionals are inexcusably negligent about. If you’re going to come here and tout your scientific credentials, that’s fine. But since the topic is 5G why not tell us in all your scientific wisdom, why you are silent about the clear, present and verifiable danger posed by our entire citizenry being perpetually bathed in millimeter wave radiation?
As for COVID 19, you absolutely DO NOT have proof of anything ‘through genetic sequencing and analysis’. The CDC itself has stated in multiple publications that it does not, nor has ever had an isolated Sars-CoV 2 virus. Furthermore the alleged ‘standard’ being used in test kits and biorepositories worldwide was sequenced from library sequences and ‘consensus’, starting from just 37 base pairs from a strand of RNA sampled from someone with ‘Covid like symptoms’. The sequence they came up with from just 37 base pairs is over 30000 base pairs long. Every functional feature was selected by ‘consensus’ not anything that verifiably existed in the real world. Since you’re an expert in such things, I invite you to read it your self in their own words. Also note the part where this sequence was inserted into human cell lines and produced no viral replication. Viral replication was only observed in monkeys.
Sally has been widely distributing this publication and asking the requisite questions while you’re here posing as expert while stating things that this article confirms cannot be true at all. What say you to this scientist?
And how does contact tracing work? Great question, easy answer. If I’m somewhere where I get sick, and you’re in the same place and you get sick that makes perfect sense. But I’m at a loss to grasp how you without cause rule out EVERY SINGLE OTHER shared environmental factor beyond an invisible virus. That we haven’t even proven exists, by the accepted standard. With no valid reason and despite knowing numerous other environmental factors exist and can be adequately quantified. The CDC has already confessed to calling “deaths by accidental or intentional injury” (murder and suicide) COVID 19 deaths in their own statistics. How do you contact trace “Covid 19 murders and suicides”? Seriously? Who told you that this was scientific in any way? I’ll tell you plainly its not. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Victor Vieira says
As a doctor and researcher, I disagree with you. “proof through genomic sequencing and analysis” that has NOT been done.. is NO proof at all!
This virus has NOT been ‘Purified’ (with Filtration and Density Gradient Centrifugation), and has NOT been ‘Identified’ (a COMPLETE Genome Sequencing) — Standard Valid Research Procedure — to then be put to the test to satisfy Koch’s (or Rivers) Postulates!
Tim Boyd says
REPLY from Sally: Are you saying that contact tracing works? Seems like it has been a failure so far. In any event, lots of people getting sick in the same place does not mean a disease is contagious–it means that they are exposed to the same toxins/stressors. Yes, they are installing 5G in New Zealand, but not clear whether it has been turned on. My contact there tells me that just recently they are feeling symptoms, like strange fizzing headaches, fainting, etc. As for Florida, we know that there was a lot of fraud in the testing–some labs giving back 100% positives. And, they ARE turning on 5G in Florida and the Southeast, but of course much easier to engage in shaming and say it is because people are having fun. Isn’t it strange that NIH/CDC/FDA have not done a single study to determine contagion in people; the Chinese did a study with hamsters and could not make them sick by exposing them to the bodily fluids from “infected” animals or people.
Please have a look at Singapore – both have 5G and successful contact tracing…and of course, government + law abiding citizens which have contributed a lot in them handling the coronavirus better. I think they probably have inside information from China ang Hongkong because they were hit hard by SARS (I was in Singapore at that time). So with Covid-19, I was listening to Singapore and Hongkong doctors who dealt with SARS. The doctor from Hongkong had said, “this is technically pandemic” two days before WHO made the announcement.
I also would like to see a doctor talk about this – maybe Dr. Natasha Campbell McBride can be contacted to comment? Plain research maybe a bit different from doctor’s point of view where they have access to patients, clinical trials, etc.
Whilst I do not discount the effect of 5G, but like everything else, there are some people who would really be affected by it and some not i.e. I know somebody who had electro-magnetic sensitivity and she immediately reacted at the place we just went in. She has her “protective clothing” on. I did not feel anything. She immediately left, I stayed for another 15 minutes, I did not feel anything despite trying to.
Tim Boyd says
Regarding Singapore, these are interesting epidemiological observations, but of course are only observations. Before we tackle such observations, we need to satisfy two basic requirements. One is to isolate and purify the “virus.” Second is to show that this virus causes illness in healthy animals or people when introduced through airborne droplets. Niether of these has been done. When it comes to epidemiological observations, it is very important to make sure that illness is determined by symptoms, and not just assumed after a positive PCR test–these results of these tests are meaningless.
Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH says
A provocative theory is presented here, though the references to the 1918 flu pandemic are quite strained, especially because there are better explanations for why people died at this time. Sally’s compelling article neglected to mention that the patent for aspirin expired in 1917, making this relatively new “miracle drug” to be dirt cheap worldwide. Further, the AMA and the US Surgeon General recommended taking 25 aspirin tablets per day (!) to suppress the fever of the flu.
Because fever is actually the vitally important way that our body’s immune system is fighting a viral infection, the really stupid use of aspirin to treat the flu was the cause of the excessive bleeding that people experienced. The increased mortality amongst soldiers stemmed from the fact that, as soldiers, they were mandated to follow the orders of their doctors, leading to the death of relatively young and previously healthy people.
Quite distinct from other flu epidemics, the 1918 flu pandemic didn’t just kill babies and elders, but killed middle-aged people in the prime of their lives…and this higher mortality rate was clearly caused by the excessive use of aspirin.
The above statement and more are all references to leading medical and scientific journals in my article that was published at Mercola.com: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/12/06/homeopathic-remedies-for-influenza.aspx
We have not learned lessons from the 1918 flu pandemic, though instead of using aspirin, doctors are encouraging the use of ibuprofen and acetaminophen. By the way, ibuprofen is KNOWN to cause blood clots, which is becoming an increasing common ailment in this Covid-19 disease. https://www.webmd.com/dvt/news/20140924/common-painkillers-tied-to-blood-clot-risk-study-suggests#:~:text=24%2C%202014%20(HealthDay%20News),clots%2C%20a%20new%20study%20suggests.
Finally, I’m curious how Sally can explain why the people in Wuhan were able to so quickly overcome this disease, even though 5G is as rampant there as ever. If 5G were really such a problem, one would think that this epidemic would be persisting in that city. I raise this question not to dismiss Sally’s intriguing theories here but to encourage her (and others) to help explain what is going on…
Martha Ray says
Yes, Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH Question everything.
‘even though 5G is as rampant there as ever’ Are we sure of that? Did usage of WiFi go up or down when they sheltered?
Can 5G strength be modulated, turned on or off ?
gibby above comment said,
“may not be turned on. they can adjust frequency,
modulation, you don’t know what it is emitting,
EMF is invisible”
One thing is for sure we all only know in part.
Tim Boyd says
REPLY from Sally: In our book The Contagion Myth, we mention the use of aspirin and vaccinations as co-factors in the 1918 flu–very similar to today when “standard of care” ventilators and anti-virals made things worse and caused a lot of deaths. But these treatments were not precipitating factors in 1918, just things that made the flu worse once people contracted it.
Patricia Boley says
The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms.
The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in a pure culture.
The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated (now diseased) experimental host and identified as identical to the original specific causative agent.
If all four conditions are met, one has proven the infectious cause for a specific set of symptoms.
This is pure baloney! I did this experiment two years ago with another coronavirus that affects pigs. We first infected immortalized chicken cells and proved that the virus kills them, then subsequently infected chickens and turkeys with the virus. They had clinical signs and we proved that they were also shedding the virus in several ways. Through immunofluorescent staining of the intestinal tissues, using Real-time PCR that detects the virus in cloacal and tracheal swabs. We also used an antibody test that detected antibodies for the virus in their serum and we sequenced isolated RNA in the swabs and compared it to the virus we infected them with. We published our data in Emerging Infectious Diseases after 8 months of peer-review. This is a normal method of studying a virus so we weren’t the first to do this type of experiment. To deny it or ignore it is simply false and an insult to scientists who study infectious diseases.
Question Everything says
Patricia Boley, are you saying that Koch’s Postulates as modified by Rivers are pure baloney or are you saying that in your opinion the author’s attempt to explore possible errors in thinking re: the virus (or other agent) that is alleged to cause Covid-19 is pure baloney — all based on your bench level experience infecting poultry with KNOWN viral agents? I really don’t understand your response. It seems that assessing an engineered infection of an animal model with purified, identified, genetically sequenced alleged so-called viral particles and watching what happens is quite different from starting with an unknown illness of unknown cause which spontaneously and sporadically breaks out in diverse populations living in very different environments and often manifesting somewhat diverse symptoms. I actually don’t understand what your comparing your poultry study to our alleged global pandemic was meant to demonstrate; it sounds like you really just repeated past work using an approach which although perhaps widely accepted nonetheless fails to measure up to the standards of Kochs/Rivers. Oh, and can you point out to me the part of the article where the author insulted “scientists who study infectious disease?” I saw only an attempt to stimulate curiosity and questions about prevailing thought re: the way this alleged virus has been legitimized in the minds of the public as THE cause of Covid-19. Anytime a researcher, or even a group of scientists, reaches conclusions which result in the destruction of global economies and massive death caused not by the alleged infectious agent but instead by the reaction to it both by doctors and governments we must DEMAND that the most precise scientific scrutiny be brought to bear on both the alleged causative agent AND the science and scientists behind the identification of said agent. What is to be lost by applying the rigor of Koch/Rivers to SarsCov2 ( did I get the name right?) in order to prove or disprove it as the the cause of what we are calling Covid-19? As to the 5G question, one of the reasons it is so difficult to assess the role it may be playing in the presentation of Covid-19 is that the communications industry is so secretive about when and where it is “rolled out” or “turned on/off” or what frequencies they are using where and when. All of that information has been withheld from the public in continuance of their policy to exclude us from as many discussions/decisions as possible until 5G exposure of all life on this planet is accomplished regardless of biological damage. As far as I have been able to tell there has been NO proof that 5G is safe, only that it is “fast” and will permit tech giants to make a fortune and governments to intrude on nearly aspect of our lives via the IOT. To my mind, it is foolish not to consider the role 5G may be playing in the current sickness and resulting tyranny sweeping the planet. To the extent it may be a factor it would certainly impact decisions on treatment — and vaccines — and freedom, would it not?
Tim Boyd says
Answer from Tom Cowan: Unfortunately, virologists do not follow the common-sense Koch’s postulates (or in the case of viruses, Rivers’ postulates) today because even if they do properly isolate the virus (which they rarely do), they cannot get these properly isolated viruses grown in a pure culture to cause disease when introduced into a host. So what they do is create “virulent” viruses by culturing them on starving cells and adding very toxic antibiotics (which kills the cells but not the “virus”). These are not pure cultures. When this antibiotic-laden culture is introduced into new cells—in the case of your experiment, immortalized chicken cells (probably taken from a tumor)—the cells die; they die because they are starved and poisoned.
In your experiment, did you isolate and purify the virus according to the 1973 Pasteur Institute isolation and purification consensus guidelines (see http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epreplyek.htm)? Were they cultured without antibiotics? When you infected chickens and turkeys with the cultured virus, what were the “clinical signs?” Were they mild or fatal? Did you determine whether these clinical signs were caused by the virus or by the antibiotics (or the injection method)?
The next step should have been to properly isolate the virus (using the 1973 Pasteur Institute guidelines) from the chickens and turkeys and see whether they caused disease when introduced into healthy chickens and turkeys. Instead you “proved” that the animals were “shedding the virus” through PCR and antibody tests—neither of which detects any virus, only genetic material and antibodies. As you say, “This is the normal method of studying a virus. . .” Indeed, this is the way virologists “study” viruses today, but it is a fraudulent method and never properly detects virus or shows that they cause disease. They do this because they cannot prove that viruses are infectious by properly isolating them and then using the common-sense Rivers’ postulates.
As for the today’s coronavirus (2019-nCoV), the most important papers on the subject all say they didn’t isolate or purify the novel coronavirus. In their July 2020 guidelines on PCR, the CDC states on page 39(https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download) that “no virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available.” It is hard to imagine doing a PCR test or knowing what the killing effect could be from a virus that has never been isolated.
LOL, I saw Magic Johnson, maskless, hugging everyone in sight after the Dodgers won the World Series. Forget COVID, remember when he had AIDS? That was going to kill all of us? That was definitely caused by HIV. Except in those cases where it wasn’t. We need look no further than this to see the folly in so called ‘experts’ thinking they’re too good to need to follow accepted standards. HIV has still not been isolated or passed through Kochs Postulates. You can have AIDS in one country, go to the neighboring country and not have it. We’re seeing the same thing with COVID, from the same players, absent the same basic standard of proof. And that which has no established standard or reproducibility is not science.
BTW, what you did was give a virus to cancer cells. Chicken cells are not ‘immortalized’, cancer cells are. So what you did had nothing to do with chickens. And we already knew that viruses could kill cancer cells. That hypothesis was proven long before your paper published. So what exactly is the point you’re trying to make? And how does it refute the validity of Kochs Postulates? Nobody can even follow the logic.
David Weiner says
The discussion of adaptation to environmental toxins, including electrosmog, via exosomes, is an interesting one.
There does seem to have been some degree of adaptation to electrosmog, but there is still a lot of excess mortality related to cancer, heart disease, and diabetes attributable to it. This was laid out by Firstenberg, Milham. It is just that it is never attributed to these causes by doctors, so there is little to no public awareness of the connection here.
We are constantly learning, thankfully. It has been proven that some bacterium are healthy for us, others are disease producing. It would not surprise me to find out that some viruses are healthy for us. It has also been proven the negative effect of radiation on living cells, and non living materials. It has been proven that stress on the body lowers the immune system. Can we postulate that 5G exposure can negatively effect a person’s immune system and leave them more susceptible to any illness?
I have worked in medical research and I can say unequivocally, bacterium and viruses are not theory. That we have learned much about them, positive and negative effects, contagion, etc. I can also say that when I heard about it, I stated this virus is from a lab. It had all the signs of being developed as a form of germ warfare. And, yes, it has finally been admitted by China that it was from a lab. With China’s practices of how they treat their people and their dishonesty and lack of integrity, what is reported by China should not be unquestionably believed.
Also, in the area of Italy that was hit partially hard, has a huge Chines population who travels back and for frequently between the two countries. And a note about the earlier spread of disease being spread along the railroad and associated electrical lines and the implication that that caused the disease… isn’t it safe to say that people travel along those lines, so an infectious disease would be more apparent in a concentrated population traveling together? This is not to say the Electoral magnetics did not effect people negatively, but just to point out that contagions spread more effectively among more dense populations. (Perhaps those traveling together in train cars, etc)
A cooralation does not prove a causation.
Electro magnetic negative effects have been known, and I have observed, have been mostly dismissed hidden from the general public, by companies and organizations who have a monetary stake in downplaying or denying these horrible effects. This should not be tolerated.
Jim West says
Great article Sally, however, please check your ref #9. Does it support your statement about 5G and oxygen absorption by lungs?
The pandemic trigger researched:
Robert Clemente says
Fantastic article, everybody should read this!!! RE the Kansas Flu (it should be renamed IMO cause that’s where it was first “detected”) one thing that wasn’t mentioned, which should, is that the military gave the troops an experimental vaccine.
Wait, where else and when did that happen? Right before Operation Desert Storm when troops were given a “vaccine cocktail” because of the fear that Saddam Hussein might unleash some of that military-grade Anthrax the US gave him.
Kansas/Spanish flu cause – A REPORT ON ANTIMENINGITIS VACCINATION AND OBSERVATIONS ON AGGLUTININS IN THE BLOOD OFCHRONIC MENINGOCOCCUS CARRIERS.
Such great information… yes, this needs to be taken into account for any “new” disease. The bad reactions to vaccinations are well known, however, these effects are also denied it downplayed. By governments and companies.
Vaccines are serious. Each vaccine must be thoroughly and truthfully vetted, not just looked at in a monetary profitable way.
From what I have observed, much of the health care in the world has changed from care and health, to monetary profits, unfortunately. So we need to be even more diligent about what this industry pumps out. As much as we need to with other industries, our food and the wireless industries to name a couple of more.
If you read Invisible Rainbow you learn the 1918 flu started at Radio Wave schools -military. I think in the NE. I checked Arthur’s reference it checked out. Not in Kansas!
Robert Clemente says
Sally: Please note this is an error: “Japan began testing 5G in tunnels in Hokkaido in early February 2020, and this city now has the most cases of coronavirus in Japan—even more than Tokyo.” Hokkaido is an island and a prefecture, not a city. Did you mean Sapporo or Hakodate or meant to write prefecture or island?
Susan Dorey says
Best wishes to you! It is important to propose an alternative explanation AND an explanation that the coronavirus has never been proven to cause COVID.
I hope and pray you will not be annihilated for your courage.
It is truly odd that the government routinely removes all counter arguments and labels them as “conspiracy theory”. It is clear that COVID is a government-approved and -perpetrated hoax. Actually there is evidence that the hoax was begun by WHO.
I managed to get a copy of your mind-blowing book from Amazon just before they banned it, perhaps because I pre-ordered. (They must have banned it a week after it came out!) I wish I’d ordered 10 copies to hand out to my friends. Is it just me or does it seem that our world is being run by an oligarchy of sociopaths and psychopaths? As the Wicked Witch of the West, said, “What a world. What a world!” Anyway, I am recommending your book and this article to everyone I know. The interesting – and shameful – part is that the people who’ve decided to inflict 5G on the rest of us are not giving us a choice. Where is the informed consent? Sounds a lot more like fascism to me.
Brian Steere says
I feel the electrical or emf causation theory to be underminging and potentially delaying of the paradigm shift to terrain as a total expression through its parts.
Firstenberg gathers much interesting research but only to support a rather familiar narrative of anthropogenic destruction – that runs as a deep archetype of existential guilt and reiterates through such events as CO2 demonisation and humans as viral nfection vectors.
I got tired of reading a reinforced hypothesis running as a call to save the world. I am very open the the idea that emf can and does place a burden on many and disease in some – as a result of a synergy of contextual conditions.
The virus idea has more merit as an immune response – or functional response to toxicity, stress burdens, and depressed or dysfunctional regenerative and healing capacity – ie malnourished or blocked as a result of toxic interventions – includinging pharmaceuticals and biologicals.
The virus idea as exosome is not itself a cause or hijacker but part of a cell-communication system within the body and through the Biome – quite possible via many pathways.
The current virus theory is a form of psycho-pathogenic agency or in old terms demonology. We fear and attack symptoms as if they are the disease.
Its modern genetic definition and research field has more in common with computer code fragments – but of a vasty more complex coding structure than our binary.
The new DNA instructing ‘vaccines’ use electric fields to open the cells to receive ‘executive codes’ that otherwise would be excluded. The conventional vaccines also bypass membranes that would otherwise exclude the pathogens and toxic adjuvants – along with other acquired contaminants.
So is communication ‘contagious’ ?
This depends on resonance of sender and receiver and susceptibility of the receiver.
The attempt to weaponise communication is a broad spectrum subjection to a fear of Communication as the Nature of Being.
The Internet promised extended global communication but actually enables the lockdown and bubble filtering of a centralised control running localised variants.
This could be seen as a kind of hijack and replication of ‘fear and control’ thinking.
I leave with a quote I feel relevant and inspiring:
“It may shock you to know that all the world’s bacteria have access to a single gene pool, which has provided an immense resource for adaptation, manifesting an array of breathtaking combinations and re-combinations for three billion years! Any bacterium—at any time—has the ability to use accessory genes, provided by other strains, which permits it to function in ways its own DNA may not cover. The global trading of genes through DNA re-combinations provides for almost endless adaptation possibilities. Therefore, what has been done to one has been done to all. Widespread use of antibacterial agents is both futile and disastrous. Future life sciences and medicine will comprehend the more effective use of agents to stimulate positive adaptation of bacteria resulting in chains of supportive symbiosis. In the presence of love, these positive adaptations naturally occur. In the presence of hatred and fear, negative and resistant strains of bacteria are more likely. Life forms are ever changing, and yet the basic chemistry of life remains the same. Do not cling to forms that are passing, but seek for an understanding of life that embraces and includes all possibilities. This is accomplished through integrating and expanding patterns and relationships. In this way, you will see God as the creative power of life. When I asked that you love one another, I was not just giving you a recipe for human fellowship. This is the doorway to life eternal.” (The Keys of Jeshua – Glenda Green)
I think this is extremely interesting and supports the common sense that always the best thing to do for our health is to eat nutritious food, and get fresh air and exercise. But are you saying nothing is contagious? What does this mean for the common cold that my family so often experiences in the winter now with a child in daycare? Is that not contagious either? What causes more sickness in the winter? And what about the common childhood illnesses, like chickenpox. Are you saying this is not contagious? I’m just trying to connect all the dots. If illness is caused by malnutrition and/or toxins, why are they’re certain patterns like cold/flu in the winter and childhood illnesses? Thanks!
From my own research and understanding of this all, as a regular person– not a medical expert whatsoever– viruses are created inside the body as a form of detoxification. Childhood illnesses, like chicken pox, emerge in the children to cleanse them of toxic buildup that has occurred in younger childhood. It also emerges as a method of strengthening the child’s immune system as they develop further in life. I would actually like to know more about this too though.
All of our bodies are running on cycles and usually a family or population of people will detoxify around the same time of year– cold and flu virus “season”. It is also a response to the toxins people are exposed to. If your family is exposed to similar toxins or assaults from the environment, then a virus will emerge to cleanse the system. Our own individual immune system strength and toxic buildup would explain the various “symptoms” produced by people within the same household. For instance, my family all had a “cold” and I only had very runny nose and headache for a couple days, my daughter developed into a mucus cough and lasted longer, my husband got a fever and severe fatigue but no runny nose. All of us had experienced the same “virus” but responded differently based on individual factors.
I hope this helps clarify some of your questions, and hopefully I am accurate in my interpretations… but I, too, am highly interested in this and see this pandemic as an enlightening experience for me on so many levels– this topic being just one of the enlightenments I’ve experienced. I am very grateful to the authors and people who share their knowledge and wisdom–for free, and with strangers. God bless you all!
George Chyz says
Great Article! Thank you.
Here’s some additional information about what viruses have been found to actually do.
First of all, over the last 30 years, genetic engineers have been using viruses to alter the genetics of organisms. Although these GMO’s may be a bad idea, the fact remains that viruses are effective in altering an organisms genetics.
Propelled by the success of genetic engineering to alter genetics, some biologists have begun using viruses to heal people using methods often referred to as virotherapy. A variety of virotherapy methods have become the subject of revolutionary research which is finding successful ways to heal challenging health problems using viruses. For example, three viruses; an echovirus, an adenovirus, and a herpes simplex-1 virus, have passed governmental regulatory approval to be used for treating cancer patients in Latvia, China, the USA, and the EU. Numerous other recombinant viruses from diverse families are being tested in cancer patients to heal even more types of cancer. Instead of causing cancer, viruses are curing cancer! Another type of gene therapy uses viruses to repair DNA to cure genetic diseases like hemophilia.
These important new branches of biology are discovering what viruses actually do—they offer DNA updates to all sorts of organisms, including humans. These very tiny protein-wrapped packets of DNA and/or RNA are essentially envelopes containing genetic information that cells and bacteria use to update their DNA. This process has been found to take place within organisms as well as to share the updates between organisms in a process that has been named “horizontal gene transfer.” As the article mentioned the term exosomes is used by these new branches of biology that view viruses in a positive way.
Joseph Schmidt says
Amazon didn’t ban your book because “the powers that be do not want the paradigm-busting information in our book to circulate”. They don’t want to sell the kind of bullshit approach to science you’re taking. There are so many holes in your logic. I’m a researcher who is also concerned about 5G, and has been for years, but there is nowhere near sufficient corroboration to make a sound claim between 5G and COVID.
The US is the laughing stock of the world right now, in large part because of high COVID deaths. Your book is just encouraging sloppy, uncritical thinkers to be anti-maskers.
Your poor science makes my head hurt. I used to love Nourishing Traditions. Now I’m wondering where your critical thinking skills are.
Mfonobong M Amana says
mate Coronavirus does not exist. Doesnt satisfy much of Koch’s and River’s postulates. So therefore you cannot say there are symptoms for something that doesn’t exist.
If you look at Dr Pall, nnEMFs tend to cause flu-like symptoms, why? Because they are poisons to the body. This has been well-documented. Amazon banned her book because it dismantles the dogma that viruses cause disease, dismantles the lies of Pasteur and other advocates. It dismantles every single narrative about corona. Amazon I don’t know whether to call them book sellers
Anybody can falsify a death certificate, anybody can amplify a surrogate test >40 cycles to declare a ‘positive test’, anyone can bring up a bullface propaganda that asymptomatic people can spread virus. So I do not know where your disposition is fully but I suggest reading Contagion Myth and watch Dr Kaufman’s videos on this matter
Judy T says
You say you’re a researcher and we’re to assume that you are a professional employed in some area of the sciences and that therefore you have knowledge that entitles you to disparage facts derived from the historical record of EMF and current studies of the coronavirus. EMF is a factor – if not the sole factor – in the spread of the virus. The evidence presented by various studies done in 2020 have convinced me that asymptomatic people who have a low viral load are incapable of infecting anyone they come in contact with. I conclude that the virus is not contagious. Due to the extensive reading and study I have done since the virus emerged in Feb 2020, I too consider myself to be a researcher.
Judy T says
I should add that even those who are symptomatic, indicating a high viral load, are incapable of infecting anyone else. This was the case in the 1918 flu epidemic when health authorities failed in their attempt to have the sick infect the healthy.
2/3 of couples, when one partner is “infected” do not pass it on to the other.
yes…in 2/3 of couples one “infected” partner does not get the other sick.
Dailymail article on this recently…from a JAMA Network Open.
Was a meta-study. Another diff meta-study said the same thing.
A BMJ article noted Viral Load is hogwash.
Are you sure masks work?
Why should people not be enlightened to explore other possible causes to what is happening today? If our own medical authorities want to denounce such, then why haven’t they done their homework in order to provide solid answers? The whole result is that people who still have half a brain are then wondering why it all seems like a means for big pharma to make money while also removing people’s freedoms and simultaneously setting up a system to further hypnotize and control the masses. For the entire supposedly knowledgeable medical authority community to insist that any other information beyond their own obviously faulted narrow-minded dictates, constitutes conspiracy theory, equates to wrongful thinking, anti-scientific approaches, and simply a means to mandate a vaccine that may possibly be more detrimental than the pandemic itself. Such scare tactics may work in the short run, but in the long run may spell disaster. The book: “Invisible Rainbow” is a well-written, well researched treatise that should certainly make people think about what is causing what and maybe even begin to try to develop protections for their lives.
If electromagnetic microwaves such as 5G etal are in fact harmless, then why are people prevented from having open access to learn what all these people are up to? Why were the bulk of thousands of initial satellite approvals rammed through during the shutdown? How many of these are going to be needed and approved and how many will be safe? If we inadvertently sterilize the planet of all life, will that be enough? We in general seem to be desirous of all the sweet electrical gadgets so the companies and FCC should not be afraid of being transparent, yet that is what is happening. Supposing there were better ways of protecting people from the vast majority of negative effects that could then be incorporated into the manufacturing and/or production of all such devices. Yet it seems that all the determinations of safety are first provided by the manufacturers to the issuers who then sign off on them as if fully researched prior to authorization of licensure. This smacks of allowing the fox to establish the security for the hen-house. How many mega-companies will want their own up there? How many countries besides us will want them? This will get out of hand so fast that people will not be able to control the damage because it will soon be too late, and may already be.
Everywhere we look today there seems to be outright corruption with the almighty dollar ruling in the absence of common sense and to what end? Okay, then the many got theirs to the exclusion of life itself. Failure of people to freely review all the behind-the-scenes activities eventually destroys productivity, and zaps life itself. Simultaneously those who are actively and monetarily so fixed they can control the world, then get so greedy they can only come up with more ways to share less with the masses, so their solution is to depopulate the planet. Are they not the self-same folks who are now developing vaccines that they intend to mandate on everyone? Suppose this whole fiasco was purposely designed to do exactly what it is doing, and perhaps there are combinations of things that cause this Covid19 pandemic? We see planes flying over constantly that are spewing unknown substances which include ionic particles of lithium, barium, and aluminum, and these are now in nearly all aircraft fuels, supposedly to study planetary weather patterns. What kind of havoc do these wreak upon everyone breathing them, especially in conjunction with other things like dirty electricity and electro-smog? What other substances might have been added since that study?
There is no end to craziness yet how can so many people be so quickly hypnotized so as to simply accept everything that is thrown to them without ever questioning the who, what, where, when, why, etc.? We are witnessing the extinction of insects good and bad, birds are disappearing in some places and migratory birds are losing their senses. Even trees and plants are trying to grow away from electricity. Yes, correlation does not necessarily equate to causation, but people have to wake up and at least realize that there is in fact a strong chance that there is a serious connection. We are seeing our basic eco-systems hemorrhaging. Einstein is probably rolling over in his grave as he once said something to the effect that when the bees are all gone, humans will be only four years away from their own demise. Closed minds should not read all this stuff, but nor should they pretend to believe in science. We need to leave no stone unturned if we are going to come up with real answers. I have only touched on a few tiny aspects and I applaud the author for what is presented, not because every single aspect was fully explained or acceptable to everyone, but because this opens up people’s minds to look around themselves and learn, and perhaps come up with answers heretofore ignored that might solve problems for people, animals and plants of all walks of life. I further applaud technology for developing all the gadgets, but they get a failing grade for not seeing further than their financial noses by first incorporating safety into the equation. Smart meters and cell phones and many if not most other things could be built to protect users from the ravages of exposure to damaging or dirty electricity. Even if there is little correlation, why not protect people anyway?
As to masks and such, I doubt they provide much protection, but I would rather err on the side of safety, just in case. It does not hurt to wear them as long as one does not cut off their own oxygen too long or breath too much carbon dioxide for too long. Maybe they will prevent us from breathing in some of the crap that has been added to aerial fuels? Regardless of anything else, Covid19 does exist and is killing some. Why they are adding everyone who dies to the list is another tell. People who die from obvious other causes but then are included on the Covid19 list is just another distortion of the facts. There is no way to tell for sure if more people have actually died from Covid19 than any other flu or not. This also adds fuel to the feeling for many people that this whole pandemic is a sham or hoax. The scare tactics being thrust on all of us then of shutdowns and things then appears to be a means to scare everyone into praying for a vaccine which supposedly will then solve all of our life’s problems. That may be the case as long as we could know for sure that they do not contain other things like the aerial fuels, such as mind control nanobots or other scary things which have been developed gratis our technological revolution. There are powerful forces among us who think that life should be their way and only their way, the rest of the world be damned, and they have the resources to accomplish their goals. The rest of us will go the way of the insects, they think. I don’t think they have thought this through because things in motion tend to stay in motion, and once this self destruction path is set for our planet and all life on board, it may not be stoppable. They may learn that their heroic efforts were simply “all for naught, and naught for all” but by then none of us will be left to witness their demise. Whether all this is simply by chance is a tiny possibility but highly improbable. Connecting all the critical dots and reading all the tells, foretells tough times ahead for all humanity unless we immediately wake up and collectively change our ways.
masks don’t work at all…
the few places where people think they work…are actually benefiting from certain environmental and ethnographic factors.
Like strong UV-B (New Zealand & Australia)….and Taiwan….
I agree EMFs are very harmful for the human body, but….
Are you implying that they are the ONLY cause of illness? Especially of a pandemic?
Explain this please:
I live in Argentina. Right now is on the top 10 countries of covid infections and it has been like that for a few months. However, Argentina as all of Latin America didn’t start having cases until March 2020 (3 months after Wuhan, 2 months after Europe), which correlates to the rate contagion of any pandemic caused by a virus. 5G?? We don’t even have plans for a 5G network installation yet..
Judy T says
There is NO pandemic. This is proved by the Infection Fatality Rate, which is the same now, 9 months into the “pandemic” as it was a year ago, 2 years ago etc. In the US 8000 Americans die every day from ALL causes. This fatality number has not increased during the “pandemic.” People dying of heart disease, diabetes, etc, are being counted as coronavirus fatalities, but this is fraudulent because the total number of deaths has not increased above the norm.
‘Cases’ are PCR positive tests and they are meaningless. This surrogate test does not prove causation nor can it diagnose illness. The CDC and FDA have stated that this test cannot be used for diagnosis. So, why is the media trumpeting ‘cases’ and terrifying the populace. THAT’S the question we should be asking.
The coronavirus is real and it is causing illness to those who are elderly, are sick with 1 or more diseases, on pharma drugs, and poorly nourished. This group needs to be protected until herd immunity is reached – as it likely is by now. The rest of us are in NO danger from this virus and do not need a toxic vaccine – whose adverse affects will not be known until millions have taken the vaccine and the results are published.
5G is a major factor in the spread of this infection. And so are, glyphosate, aluminum, mercury, pesticides, chemicals in drinking water, poisons in our food supply, air pollution, other environmental toxins, with biodiesal fuels being especially harmful .
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally:
Of course there are many causes of illness, but they are not viruses.
If “covid infections” means positive test results, this is meaningless. These tests cannot be used to diagnose illness, although that is how they are using them. As for 5G, it could be there and not announced yet, or coming from satellites.
But Uruguay has 5G.
electrical energy is transmitted through touch/physical contact.
And then you are thinking why does Uruguay not have much C19 problems…rising fast now…but there are other enviro/terrain factors
I find the article to be rather unscientific. I agree 5G may be unhealthy and could be contributing the spread of the coronavirus in some way. But I do believe that is a real virus.
For example, I practice Jiu Jitsu martial arts and an instructor at the school became infected with it and spread it to his family. He taught at my school and we all wear masks and did not get it.
Also, a very healthy 23 year old in my school contracted the virus separately from traveling during Thanksgiving.
As for me, I live in a 5G area and have not contracted it yet. But I also wear a mask and practice good social distancing.
Judy T says
The coronavirus is a real virus BUT it is not the cause of disease because NO virus is the cause of disease. This concept is so alien to what we have been told about viruses since Pasteur, that it is extremely difficult for us to accept. The concept that viruses do not cause disease – that they are in fact part of our immune system that helps to keep us healthy by ridding our bodies of pathogens – is not a theory, but a proven fact.
Information re this subject is easily available, in books such as ‘Contagion Myth’ and ‘Dissolving Illusions’ and online articles. Reading some or all of the references listed at the end of the article will help those who want to be informed. And being informed is crucial because a vaccine mandate is planned and will soon be coming our way.
Tim Boyd says
REPLY from Sally: These are epidemiological observations, very interesting but only observations. Only when you isolate and purify a virus from a sick person and then make a well person sick with the virus have you proven the illness is caused by a virus. Remember, we are all now bathed in 5G frequencies (either microwaves or 600 MHz 5G Lite) so anyone could get sick from that. . . and what do you mean by sick? If it is a positive PCR test, these tests are completely meaningless.
While the article pundits numerous theories and decries established scientific theories, there is however one very valid and explicit method to test these competing theories. Those who do not believe in the Germ theory and viruses can show both the faith in these opposing theories and direct empirical evidence to support these theories quite simply. As to the Coronavirus, they can volunteer to go work in the ICU of any hospital in an affected area and eschew PPE and other guidelines followed by the supporters of opposing theories and work there for 2-3 months. If they do not catch the disease then they have proven that it is not caused by the Corona virus and that will suffice for Coronavirus. If you believe that asymptomatic people cannot spread then the same test can be applied, spend several weeks with a pool of asymptomatic people and see the results, it gets no simpler than that to prove the theory.
As to the theory that viruses do not cause disease then please volunteer to go to Equatorial Africa amid an outbreak of Ebola and follow the same process. Handle the dead/infected without PPE and sanitary guidelines and see how things turn out. Empirical evidence will be shown one way or another. If that is prohibitive in cost or accessibility then go to the CDC and volunteer to be infected with some Ebola virus from a sample and wait to see the results. The same can be done for any of the other viruses that cause disease, let’s take Smallpox for example, it no longer exists in the population so to people who do not believe it would cause an illness, take a virus sample and let them infect themselves, of course they would have to be born after the smallpox vaccine stopped being used on people. That should determine if Smallpox is caused by a virus, although the disappearance of it in the general population is hard to quantify given the increase in EMF in the world in the intervening years.
So it would go for any other disease, let’s take TB it is a bacterial caused disease. Same test process, infect volunteers who doubt the germ would cause the disease and see the results on them after a few months. It is not too hard to say that any theory can be proven this way for any disease we suffer from that is said to be caused by bacteria or viruses.
Very simply, to prove the assertion that viruses and bacteria do not cause disease then please step up to the scientific table and volunteer to be the test subject for your theory. If the theories proposed in the article are in fact true then there is no reason to believe that these volunteers would suffer any ill effects since the other opposing theories( Germs and Viruses causes disease) are incorrect to begin with. This would cut through all the back and forth arguments and book/article citations about the proposed theories. We have the means to test the 5G theory and the other propositions. We just need backers of these theories to step up, volunteer to be infected and prove they are correct.
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally:
These are excellent comments and observations and we completely agree that the public health services should do these kind of contagion studies. They would be of two types:
1. Introduce purified, isolated virus (COVID, Ebola, whatever) into healthy volunteers in the normal way–breathing it in–and see what happens. The problem with this they don’t have purified, isolated virus from most diseases. The only two “viruses” I know of that have been purified are chicken pox and herpes–and researchers have not been able to make people sick simply by introducing these into healthy volunteers.
2. Expose healthy volunteers to sick people. This must be in an environment that does not have other possible vectors for disease–such as sewer-infected water, insects with toxic bites or wireless radiation. Remember that the U.S. public health service was not able to make healthy volunteers sick by exposing them to people with the Spanish flu in 1918.
I think it is interesting that we have lots of cases where nurses and doctors caring for people with TB, Ebola, Covid, etc have not gotten sick, at least not at the same rate as the general population. For example, we just published a letter about a leprosy ward in Louisiana where the staff never got sick–it was called a “miracle,” but what it shows is that leprosy is not contagious. Of course nurses and doctors working with Covid cases today are often exhausted, and also exposed to lots of wireless radiation in the hospitals, so this could explain cases of illness among the staff.
It is so easy to mistake a situation of lots of people getting sick at the same time as an example of contagion. For example, scurvy used to be considered contagious–sailors would all get it on a ship so it was considered contagious–what else could it be? Then when it was discovered to be a vitamin deficiency, no one called it contagious anymore.
Anyway, if you will send me some truly isolated and purified covid virus, I’d be happy to spray it in my mouth and up my nose and let you know what happens. Sally
I wish this article had not been published by the Weston A. Price Foundation. It touches on a subject of many unknowns and unconfirmed assumptions that border on opinions rather than facts. It is now almost the end of 2020, with over 300K Americans dead by the worst pandemic, YES, pandemic, to hit the world in modern times. The misinformation out there is the primary reason the U.S. has the highest death rate of a developed country, we are not a Third World country. I do agree EMF and it’s effects on living organisms (basically our entire natural world) need to be looked at from different views other than the greed ones, but once you bring Covid-19 into the argument a leap has been made. The entire argument now has nothing to stand on other than misguided (being kind here) opinions. I have been dealing with autoimmune disease since 2012, and the Weston A. Price Foundation has always been a great resource for me. I have purchased books, and visit the website when needed. I came here today because I am putting together a list of resources for a dear friend who was diagnosed recently with an autoimmune disease, but I cannot in good conscience include this website for him to review. I cannot risk him dismissing this great resource based on this one article. I found it front-and-center, so will he. The premise of this article and even worse, some of the opinions, diminish the message of the Foundation.
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally
WAPF does not think that a disease with all the hallmarks of radiation poisoning is caused by a virus, especially since scientists have yet to isolate and characterize this virus.
At the same time, we are NOT minimizing this disease–we are NOT arguing that it is just a bad case of the flu. It is very serious and will kill a lot more people until we recognize the true cause and take measures to minimize our exposure to millimeter wave technology and other electro-smog. Current measures, such as masks, social distancing and vaccinations will only make things worse.
Sorry you do not like our message. Please don’t kill the messenger.
Frank Rigal says
As an engineer I have worked both with telecom tech and with biotech issues. That may be why I may be more aware of the connection between radiations and microbiology.
But I also have a hobby: the study of toxicology and the history of poisons. By the way, did you know that the word virus means poison?
That is interesting especially since the only thing resembling what is supposed to be a virus on an Electronic microscope is the exosome, our cells toxic waste garbage truck.
I see a clear correlation between historical pandemies and periods just after a peak or a minimum in solar activity, also corresponding with top solar spots activity.
And I see how modern radiation sources have now taken over.
But it strikes me that two other causes have not really been explored more thoroughly. One is the role of radiations and often bad harvest years or wars, in the mineral and vitamin depletion of given populations diet.
And of course radiations at certain frequencies and enough power will drastically reduce for example A, D and E vitamins as well as zinc in the body. This by the way will induce Neurasthenia, with symptoms such as loss of taste and smell.
The other, and more interesting, since largely ignored, cause is poisoning. Or more pecisely organised slow poisoning.
Glyphosates in our tap water and food are in sufficiently high amounts to seriously disturb most of our microbiome, that is our good bacteria, but not the bad ones.
Glyphosates and other pesticides and herbicides accomplish this by binding available vitamins and minerals into non-available compounds.
Interestingly enough that combines with the effect of radiations, especially wifi (2.45 Ghz), in reducing the bioavailability of our minerals and vitamins. Add to this a 80% reduction in the amount of minerals and vitamins in vegetables and fruit over the past 100 years and you get a clearer picture.
One could of course, in the grand Scheme og things, think all of this occured by chance, or as a result of capitalism or whatever.
Since men stopped believing in God they also seem to have a problem fathoming other evils than racism, bigotry or homophobia.
Real evil is organised, systematic, global, in control of most areas of our power structures at the higher levels. It is also fairly more advanced technologically and scientifically than we generally assume.
This advance is mainly used against people in an intent to impede God’s plan for them. This also is used in giving us a totally upside down perception of, for example bacteria and virus.
It is also used to demineralise and devitaminate us so that we get sick and then believe it was because of a bacteria or a virus.
Any good homeopath will tell you that all sicknesses begin with a poisoning. But absorbing a small (omeopathic) amount of the same poison will help the body react to it and defend (detox) itself, with the help ot exosomes.
Bacteria are real time variations (pleoformism) of your microzymas which have the job of breaking down dead stuff to eliminate it and free nutrients. The tougher the job the more acid (mycotoxins etc,,,) they will produce to get the job done.
Should one extract some of this acid and inject it into your bloodstream, that would cut down your blood ph to possibly lethal levels.
To come back to radiations. Different frequencies and power have been shown to affect our bodies either positively or negatively. As we saw it 2.45 Ghz is bad for you. But the earth’s (called Schuman’s) frequency of 7.8 Hz is very good.
The real worry here is if, and how, the wifi signal could be modified in intensity but not in terms of internet speed but in terms of Emf, or radiations.
Since the beginning of the corona crisis I have noticed indications this may be be happening. For example my phone’s mobile internet speed has dropped in places it used to be fine.
Numerous friends are telling me their phone often does not ring when someone calls them. Several led lights in mye home have ceased to work or have problems starting. Light fluorescent tubes too have problems starting.
Using my laptop on my lap has become a real problem, hips and knee pains for example, which stopped since I stopped using it on mye laptop this way.
Judy T says
5G is a factor in the cause of disease, including coronavirus. In the landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. “This is a landmark case ….The overwhelming experimental and human evidence which the FCC has ignored leaves no doubt that wireless technology is a major contributory factor to this epidemic. The FCC has shown that its chief interest is protecting the telecom industry and maximizing its profits. For more info, go to:
This article is incredible. I just ordered the book online.
I have ordered products from DefenderShield and Lambs which are physical EMF barriers. I have purchased grounding mats.
I found this company EMF Harmony which claims to have devices which neutralize radiation. On the website there are lots of studies backing up their claims. WAPF is very pro-evidence.
What does WAPF think of these products?
Do EMFs in the home damage the nutrients in food if stored for extended periods? (Should food be EMF shielded?)
What do you think of EMF Harmony products?
Do EMFs damage food since food is alive?
John Schroeder says
Enjoyed this very much: As I have read Contagion Myth: it is familiar;
I have also read : Anton Beauchamp’s works: Blood the Third Anatomical Element:
Also Virus Mania: Andrew Kaufman: his videos I have downloaded: and the
Weston A Price : site: there is so much information here its great:
As I was raised in the outback of Australia: so some of the old dietary foods:
are a boon to me: crumbed sheep’s brains: yum: liver: yes with butter: well that’s
all we had:
I not a scientist as such: I am a profiler: a behavioural observer: a watcher:
of evidence based observations: a Criminalist: It is painstaking work: you can
develop theories: but in the end what you discover: must be supported by fact;
What we see going on these days: the evidence is tainted: it is all to easy:
for narratives to be formed: as there are so much preconceived programming;
conceptualised fantasy: and so much to be afraid of: which is fully exploited:
The principal ingredient in this is the lack of knowledge: or the desire to acquire
it: most are too involved in the struggle: as time is exploited as a premium commodity:
It is very reassuring for me: that people such as Sally Fallon : Dr.Tom Cowan:
Andrew Kaufman: Torsten Englebrecht and some many other brave and
committed Scientists and Doctors: Researchers: work so hard for us:
I understand lies; the sophistication of verbal contracts of deciet: the behavioural
triggers: the pathology and practice: it was my stock and trade: In these times:
the same Virus pervades: the fpc virus: fear power control: and the same human
condition: drives it: The terrain and the battle remains the same as it has always
Jonathan Rizzo says
If temporary illnesses are caused by environmental toxins, why would the illness so frequently be temporary, since exposure usually doesn’t last just a few days or weeks. Exposures to metals and such are usually constant and unrealized by the person or family. It seems unlikely that your body would always be able to adapt and become healthy again while still being exposed. My best ability is using logic and this is what my brain spit out. Seems like an insurmountable challenge to this theory, or maybe I have not absorbed the theory well enough.
Paul Antonucci says
What about the spreader and super spreader events?
They certainly appear to show contagion.
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally:
As for what you are calling super-spreader events, which happen when a lot of people are together, the explanation is simple: All with cell phones on, all exposed to 5G in a confined space. In fact, contagion cannot explain a lot of people getting sick during or immediately after an event; only simultaneous poisoning (radiation poisoning) can explain lots of people getting sick so quickly.
Paul Antonucci says
If spread is due to EMFs how do you explain
corona virus rates going down after vaccinations?
There is no change in EMFs.
Cities and States with high vaccination rates have
substantially reduced infection rates. Press reports are
that most new infections are of unvaccinated people.
Tim Boyd says
Reply from Sally:
It is really amazing that all the major media report that the unvaccinated are getting covid while the vaccinated are not–that 99 % of the deaths from Covid are in the unvaccinated. This just shows how coordinated are the propaganda efforts.
Here is a good analysis of this assertion:
Regarding myth of the vaccinated spreading disease and are “variant factories,” this Israeli research made waves as a preprint in April, but received no press after peer review and publication:
And here is an article from the UK stating that vaccinated people are 65 percent more likely to be hospitalized and 1540 percent more likely to die.
Here is another post indicating that the vaccines are causing deaths worldwide:
I can’t even… There is so much evidence that it’s contagious, and that wearing masks significantly slows down the spread of the disease. Lockdowns do the same thing. Look at New Zealand. I’m not saying that having a bunch of frequencies in the environment is a good thing, but this article has just single-handedly managed to take the trustworthiness of this site for me from 95% to 5%, as a whole. I’ll now no longer approach the articles assuming them to be probably true.
I get that it was written early in the pandemic, but even so. Even if we don’t accept the existence of viruses (which is something I’m open-minded to), it’s clear that whatever is going on is transmitted in various ways to other people, chiefly through air, and that that trasmission can be mitigated to slow down the spread of whatever this is. It’s just mind-blowing to me that a site that I held in such high regard is propagating articles that choose to ignore basic facts. If it was caused by 5g and the like (and I am open-minded about many nasty things being caused by that), then the pattern of the spread of the disease would simply be different, even keeping in mind the not-so-great detection methods that existed a year ago.