Page 76 - Fall2011
P. 76

Legislative Updates


                                 STAYING INVOLVED TO PROTECT OUR FARMS AND OUR FOOD
                                                       By Judith McGeary, Esq.




                                        In the world of activism, there is a “power   tive Controls” plan, not a HACCP plan. See
                                    ladder.” A group or movement starts by being   FSMA §103. In assessing HARPC’s, the
                                    powerless, then moves up to being recognized,   FDA should therefore look at risk reduction
                                    at the table, able to make a deal, able to make   rather than kill steps at critical points.
                                    a deal stick and, finally, able to participate in     As included in FSMA, the Tester-Hagan
                                    governance. A group may be at different stages   amendment provides that facilities that gross
                                    of the power ladder on different issues and will   under $500,000 annually and that sell more
                                    invariably shift forward and backward over time.  than half of their products directly to con-
                                        The local foods movement as a whole is at   sumers or to local restaurants and retailers
                                    the table and has achieved some victories in mak-  are not required to do a HARPC plan if they
                                    ing deals. The problem often lies, however, in   provide documentation of compliance with
                                    making the deal stick. All too often after declar-  state or local food safety laws. See FSMA
                                    ing victory on a bill, groups become complacent,   §103(l). This amendment relieves small,
                                    only to find their hard-won deal is undone in the   direct-marketing facilities from the burden
                                    rulemaking process.                         of a federal HARPC plan.
                                        WAPF was one of the organizations that     There will still, however, be very impor-
                                    fought hard for important protections for small-  tant differences in scale in the facilities that
                                    scale producers from new burdens under the   are subject to the new HARPC requirement.
                                    Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). And   From small wholesale operations to medium-
                                    now we have to stop the FDA from undermin-  scale direct marketers, there will be numer-
                    Judith McGeary   ing that victory in the rulemaking process. The   ous facilities subject to the regulations that
                  is the Austin, Texas   agency is just beginning the process and has   are a fraction the size of the large processors
                    Chapter Leader,
                    an attorney and   asked for informal comments on several specific   to which almost all of the foodborne illness
                     small farmer in   topics in preparation for proposing new rules.   outbreaks have been traced. WAPF urges
                     Austin, and the  WAPF has provided comments on issues such   the FDA to include scale-sensitive consid-
                Executive Director of  as which facilities should be exempted as “very   erations at every step of the process.
                 the Farm and Ranch  small businesses,” how to classify low-risk fa-
                  Freedom Alliance.   cilities, and factors that FDA should consider in      The comments went on to provide concrete
                    She has a B.S. in   prioritizing inspections and enforcement activi-  recommendations of the sorts of provisions
                       Biology from
                  Stanford University   ties. Most recently, WAPF provided comments   that are reasonably necessary to protect food
                  and a J.D. from the   about hazard analysis plans for facilities making   safety with bone broths, raw milk cheeses, and
                  University of Texas   traditional foods such as raw milk cheeses, bone   lacto-fermented vegetables. Just as importantly,
                  at Austin. She and  broths, and lacto-fermented vegetables.  WAPF’s comments pointed out what should not
                       her husband                                             be required of artisanal producers of these foods.
                         run a small  WAPF’s comments stated:                  It is all too likely that FDA, based on its typical
                    grass-based farm                                           industrial-food model, would consider a hazard
                  with sheep, cattle,     The government’s approach to HACCP   analysis plan inadequate if it didn’t include
                 horses, and poultry.   (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control   provisions such as stainless steel aging boards
                          For more
                   information go to   Points) plans has frequently involved “kill   for cheese or chlorine rinses for vegetables used
                www.farmandranch-    steps” such as pasteurization or irradiation.   in fermentation or similarly misguided require-
                     freedom.org or   The FSMA, however, requires a HARPC      ments. WAPF’s comments put the agency on
                 call (512) 243-9404.   (Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preven-  notice that these provisions are both unnecessary
               76                                         Wise Traditions                                    FALL 2011                   FALL 2011                                  Wise Traditions





         82725_WAPF_Txt.indd   76                                                                                    9/15/11   2:01 PM
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81