Page 79 - Fall2010

WOULD yOU FEED yOUR CHILD SOy?
By Gail Elbeck, Investigative Researcher

Suppose the FDA told you that “soybean, genistein, daidzein” are included on their “Poisonous Plant Database.”Would
you feed your baby soy-based formula, soy foods and beverages? Alarmingly, infant milk formulas are increasingly soy-
added, as are vaccinations, a direct injection of soy phyto-poisoning. Suppose the FDA told you they acknowledge
soy as an active “estrogenic endocrine disruptor,” well-known as developmentally damaging, while at the same time
allowing increasing soy marketing to target infants and children. Suppose the FDA told you that soy phyto-estrogens
are equally developmentally health-threatening as all other estrogens. Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA told you that they know soy phyto-poisonous estrogenic endocrine disruptors transfer to the
fetus during pregnancy and nursing, and that sperm carries potential fertilization contamination caused by male soy
consumption. Would you consume soy?
Suppose the FDA told you that the 2010 NTP Brief on soy formula reports that there is “Clear evidence of adverse
effects of genistein in studies with gestational, lactational and post-weaning treatment,” and that “Daidzein has estro-
genic activity of its own.” Would you allow poisonous-plant estrogenic endocrine disruptors to contaminate your fetus,
infant and child? Suppose the NTP referred to soy as a “treatment.” Would you feed a phyto-poisonous “treatment” to
your child?
Suppose the FDA told you they acknowledge more than seven hundred scientific studies proving soy to be extremely
toxic to development, neurological function and reproductive health, especially during fetal, infant and child exposure.
Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA told you that soy is loaded with fluctuating levels of phytic acid, heavy metals, several toxic com-
pounds, and inhibits essential enzymes necessary for normal development. Would you feed your child soy? Suppose
the FDA told you the 1999 FDA Federal Register reports, “GRAS status of soy protein food ingredients did not include a
thorough evaluation of the safety of potentially harmful components, e.g. lysinalanine, nitrites, and nitrosamins, trypsin
inhibitors, phytates and isoflavones (estrogens).” Would you feed soy-poisons to your child?
Suppose the FDA told you soy phyto-poisonous estrogenic endocrine disruptors are not FDA approved as safe or
nutritous. Would you feed soy to your child? Suppose the FDA told you that the main soy formula ingredients—corn
syrup, soy and sugar—are each developmental poisons. Would you feed your child soy formula?
Suppose the FDA told you ongoing scientific studies reported by the best NIEHS scientists, including Doerge,
Sheehan, Newbold, and Chang, along with multiple NIH scientists and physicians, report extensive developmental soy
toxicity. Would you feed your child soy? Suppose the FDA told you about the multitude of detailed scientific studies
proving the soy estrogenic endocrine disruptor toxicity causation of (irreversible) autism, seizures, mental retardation,
allergies, asthma, thymus damage, hypothyroidism, immune deficiency disorders, damage to pancreas, liver, and kidney,
diabetes, leukemia, multiple cancers, metastasis, gender chaos and infertility, homosexuality—pain and suffering for a
lifetime. Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA told you that the National Toxicology Program (NTP) report concluded outrageous “levels of
aluminum found in soy (600-1300ng/mL) infant formula compared to human milk level of 4-65 ng/mL,” and the CDC
confirmation of “brain and bone disease caused by high levels of aluminum in the body has been seen in children. . .
Aluminum from the mother can enter her unborn baby through the placenta.” Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA told you that cancer patients, male and female, are commonly told to stop eating soy products
due to the sure threat of estrogenic endocrine disruptor causation of cancer metastasis, and that soy can interfere with
prescribed hormone drugs. Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA told you people who struggle with infertility and reproductive disorders are commonly instructed
to stop eating soy. Would you feed your child soy? Suppose the FDA told you they acknowledge the toxic soy-causation
of extensive and irreversible destruction of developmental health. Would you feed your child soy?
Suppose the FDA continues to ignore a year-long submitted formal petition requesting appropriate soy-toxicity
warning labels especially during developmental exposure, as well as withdrawal of soy-poisonous infant formulas. Would
you feed soy to your beautiful healthy baby?
As you know, the FDA does not publicly reveal any of these multiple soy phyto-poisonous facts. American parents
and their families painfully (and unnecessarily) suffer because of withheld FDA acknowledgment of established soy-
toxicity, the worst FDA deception in American history.
Overwhelming evidence reveals that the FDA continues to protect the multi-billion dollar soy industry over and
above the good health and well-being of fetus, infants, and children. The FDA refuses to warn against the existence of
massive scientific evidence proving beyond any doubt that developmental soy-poisoning is highly capable of destroying
the good health and well-being of children and adults.

FALL 2010 Wise Traditions 79