Page 80 - Fall2013
P. 80

Legislative Updates



                                             CONGRESS FLEXES NEW MUSCLES,
                                       WHILE BECOMING MIRED IN FARM BILL DEBATES
                                                 By Judith McGeary, Esq.





                                  When Congress passed the Food Safety  so. It’s also vital that anyone concerned with the
                              Modernization Act (FSMA) in 2010, it gave the  survival of sustainable agriculture and the local
                              Food and Drug Administration (FDA) significant  food movement should contact their legislators―
                              new powers. For a couple of years, the agency  both before and after the comment deadline―to
                              did very little with its new authority. But now the  urge Congress to limit the agency’s power.
                              FDA has proposed rules that fulfill some of the
                              worst predictions of what the agency might do.   THe TeSTeR-HAgAn exeMPTIOn
                                  The proposed rules address two key provi-     When Congress passed the FSMA, it in-
                              sions of the FSMA:                         cluded a very important provision―championed
                                                                         by Senators Jon Tester (D-MT) and Kay Hagan
                              •  On-Farm Produce Standards Rule: Creates  (D-NC)―to exempt small-scale, direct market-
                                  requirements for every aspect of growing  ing producers from the on-farm produce stan-
                                  and harvesting fruits, vegetables and nuts.  dards and HARPC requirements. Specifically,
                              •  HARPC Rule: Requires businesses (includ-  farmers or food producers who sell less than
                                  ing farms) that pack, store, or process foods  five hundred thousand dollars per year, and who
                                  to do hazard analysis and risk-based preven-  sell more than half of their products directly to
                                  tative control (HARPC) plans.          individual consumers or to local restaurants and
                                                                         retailers, are exempted from the produce safety

              Judith McGeary      These two provisions are explained in  and HARPC rules.
           is the Austin, Texas   greater detail below.                     This exemption is vital to the survival of
            chapter leader, an      The ultimate effect of these rules will be to  the local foods movement. Unfortunately, in the
                attorney and   reduce the safety of our food supply by increasing  final negotiations on the Tester-Hagan amend-
              small farmer in   our reliance on foreign food sources. The U.S.  ment, Congress included a provision that allows
              Austin, and the   already imports about 15 percent of our food  the FDA to revoke the exemption under certain
          executive director of   supply, including nearly 50 percent of fresh fruit  conditions. The revocation must be done on a
          the Farm and Ranch   and 20 percent of fresh vegetables. Less than 1  case-by-case basis; in other words, the FDA can
            Freedom Alliance.   percent of this imported food is inspected by the  revoke the exemption on Farm A, but cannot
             She has a B.S. in
                biology from   FDA, and the agency itself says that it doesn’t  revoke the exemption on all the farms in the
           Stanford University   have the capacity to inspect more than 2 percent.  country or in a state.
           and a J.D. from the   This problem is supposedly being addressed     Although limited to targeting individual
           University of Texas   through new requirements for importer verifica-  farms, the FDA’s proposed rules implementing
            at Austin. She and   tion, so that the foreign suppliers will be held to  this provision are deeply worrisome because
                her husband   the same standard as domestic. But whatever is  FDA claims authority to revoke a farmer’s or
                  run a small   written on paper, it is certain that food coming  processor’s Tester-Hagan exemption based al-
             grass-based farm
           with sheep, cattle,   from places such as China and South America  most entirely on the official’s discretion. If an
          horses, and poultry.   will not actually be held to the same standards  FDA official decides that a farm or processor is
                   For more   as will be imposed on U.S. producers.      connected to a foodborne illness outbreak or that
            information go to      It’s important to realize that these are only  revocation is “necessary” to “protect the public
         www.farmandranch-    proposed rules. Nothing is final yet. Farmers and  health and prevent or mitigate a foodborne illness
              freedom.org or   consumers have until November 15, 2013 to file  outbreak based on conduct or conditions associ-
          call (254) 697-2661.   comments with the agency, and it is critical to do  ated” with the farm or processor, the official can
         78                                         Wise Traditions                                    FALL 2013                   FALL 2013                                  Wise Traditions





   123816_text.indd   78                                                                                       9/20/13   1:00 AM
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85