Page 47 - Spring2020
P. 47

or toxic ingredients in vaccines are viewed as  questions, concerns or doubts about the ethics   Imposing
            secondary to the goal of minimizing the risk of  of vaccine use.                   compulsory
            certain diseases. Individuals who espouse the   The Brotherhood Medical Advocate of the
            other point of view—the one articulated by Mr.  Mennonite Church Conference of Washington  vaccination
            Weaver—believe that drinking raw milk from  County, Maryland, and Franklin County, Penn-  could
            healthy cows and eating nutrient-dense foods  sylvania, issued a helpful booklet in 2012 en-  precipitate
            (including plenty of good animal fats) promotes  titled “Vaccine Issues” to provide guidance and
            health and strengthens natural immunity. As a  to provoke further discussion around the topic  changes in
            result, there is less need for vaccines, which are  of ethical and non-ethical vaccines and their   the traditional
            not only accompanied by moral dilemmas and  use. This sensitively-written document covered   culture of
            toxic ingredients but also may even alter the  a wide range of issues—including vaccine pro-
            integrity of the human immune system.     duction methods, the use of fetal tissue in the  Mennonite
                                                      preparation of some vaccines, abortion and its   communities.
            THE VACCINE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION           connection to vaccine production, the ethics of
               On May 15, 1972, in Wisconsin v. Yoder,  vaccines for venereal disease, moral issues and
            the U.S. Supreme Court ruled seven to zero that  Bible scripture, ethical vaccine products avail-
            Wisconsin’s compulsory school attendance law  able for some diseases (but not for others), pros
            was unconstitutional when applied to the Amish  and cons of health considerations and more. It
            because it violated their rights under the First  would be hard to read this document and not
            Amendment, which guarantees the free exercise  come away with the conclusion that Mennonite
            of religion.  This ruling is extremely important  objections to compulsory vaccination of school
                     5
            to Plain (Amish and Mennonite) communities.  children are real and deeply connected with their
               Thus, these communities regard New  religious understanding and moral conviction.
            York’s repeal of the religious exemption to vac-  The last paragraph of “Vaccine Issues” also con-
            cinations with real alarm, and it is an issue that  tained a prescient warning. Encouraging church
            raises strong concerns in Mr. Weaver’s Men-  members not to accept free vaccinations from
            nonite community. These communities realize  the state or state-funded clinics, it concluded:
            that the revocation of the religious exemption is  “We want to accept personal responsibility for
            just the beginning of a process that could lead to  our own. We also want to avoid being entangled
            the state imposing other regulations on Amish  with the state should morally questionable vac-
            and Mennonite schools.                    cines be required.” 6
               Let us imagine for a moment a situation   That situation has now come to pass.
            where the religious exemption has not been
            eliminated. Why would some Mennonite com-  WHAT’S AT STAKE
            munities want to have a religious exemption   For each of these three issues—education,
            to vaccinations for their children? What is the  health and the religious exemption—we can see
            connection between vaccines and Mennonite  how imposing compulsory vaccination could
            religious belief? Although all Mennonites are  precipitate changes in the traditional culture of
            Christian, their lifestyles and choices can be  Mennonite communities. Some of the changes
            quite diverse.                            would undoubtedly be subtle, but others per-
               At one end of the spectrum are very con-  haps would not be so subtle. Modification of
            servative groups who may appear similar to  the educational process, for example, might
            Old Order Amish, using horse and buggy for  affect how children learn to relate to authority
            transportation, wearing distinctive clothing  or could impose state regulations that infringe
            and rejecting most modern technology. At  on school autonomy. Would there also be an im-
            the other end are Mennonites whose cloth-  pact on how community members view health,
            ing, transportation and use of technology are  shifting from a perspective of compassion and
            virtually indistinguishable from mainstream  common sense to blind adherence to corporate
            Protestant churchgoers. Even so, it is probably  medical science? Legal challenges could bring
            safe to say that most Mennonites harbor some  their own set of impacts, including the imposi-

            SPRING 2020                              Wise Traditions                                                   47
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52