Page 92 - Spring2020
P. 92

Legislative Updates


                                            FEDERAL POLICY UPDATE
                                              By Judith McGeary, Esq.




                              LABS VERSUS FARMS                        the labs, both in resources and the resulting
                                  In January, the Guardian published an  impacts? How much concrete, steel and energy
                              article by famed environmentalist George Mon-  will be used in building and maintaining these
                              biot entitled “Lab-grown food will soon destroy  factories?
                              farming—and save the planet.” Monbiot’s core     And remember that not all resources are the
                              message can be summarized in this quote from  same. The labs will be run entirely with what
                              the article: “We are on the cusp of the biggest  is known as “blue water”—water pulled from
                              economic transformation, of any kind, for 200  aquifers or reservoirs. In contrast, pasture-based
                              years. While arguments rage about plant- versus  farms use “green water”—water that comes as
                              meat-based diets, new technologies will soon  rainfall or snowpack, as part of the natural cycle.
                              make them irrelevant. Before long, most of our  Green water usage is far more sustainable than
                              food will come neither from animals nor plants,  blue water. And that’s just one example of the
                              but from unicellular life. After 12,000 years of  sort of logical gaps in arguing that lab-based
                              feeding humankind, all farming except fruit  foods are sustainably raised.
                              and veg production is likely to be replaced by     Which brings us to the point that the com-
                              ferming: brewing microbes through precision  parisons are largely based on a false dichotomy
                              fermentation. This means multiplying micro-  between conventional agriculture and labs.
                              organisms, to produce particular products, in  There is another alternative: regenerative agri-
                              factories. I know some people will be horrified  culture. It massively reduces the water needed
                              by this prospect. I can see some drawbacks. But  for agriculture, affirmatively cleans air and
                              I believe it comes in the nick of time.”  water through natural processes, rebuilds top-
                                  He goes on to compare the laboratory  soil—and provides high-quality food that can
                              food to the conventional agriculture system.  improve human health and reduce our existing
              Judith McGeary
            is the Austin, Texas,   He correctly points to the water shortages, the  health crisis.
             chapter leader, an   devastating loss of topsoil and fertility, water     Yet Monbiot’s article claims that this al-
                 attorney and   and air pollution, and the destruction of valu-  ternative is not sustainable. He cites a study in
          small farmer, and the   able habitats and wildlife resources that have  Nature that looked at what they term “extensive
           executive director of
           the Farm and Ranch   been caused by so-called modern agriculture.  farming” (as opposed to “intensive farming,”
             Freedom Alliance.   Monbiot touts the new fermentation approach as  namely feedlots and confined operations). He
              She has a B.S. in   providing immense energy and water savings, as  points to a single study, which claims that ex-
                 biology from   well as the reduced need for land. But he skips  tensive farming is even more harmful for the
            Stanford University
            and a J.D. from the   several vital points in his analysis.  environment than intensive—not only using
            University of Texas      First, what will be the nutritional quality  more land (which is the common critique of
             at Austin. She and   of the resulting food, beyond simply providing  pasture-based systems), but somehow creating
                 her husband   calories? What will be the cost, in human health  greater greenhouse gas emissions, soil loss, wa-
                  run a small
              grass-based farm   and welfare, from eating laboratory-grown  ter use and nitrogen and phosphorous pollution.
            with sheep, cattle,   foods produced by genetically engineered bac-     That sounds bizarre to anyone familiar with
            horses and poultry.   teria? As is typical in the conventional system,  pasture-based farming. But it all makes sense
                   For more   Monbiot appears to focus solely on protein,  when you read the study and realize that the
             information, go to
                farmandranch   carbs and fats as categories, without concern  example of “extensive farming” was done on
               freedom.org or   for nutrient density.                  cleared forest land in the Amazon, using only
            call (254) 697-2661.      Second, what is the true life-cycle cost of  cows, and no mention of rotational grazing.
         92                                       Wise Traditions                                 SPRING 2020
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97