Page 94 - Spring2020
P. 94

In other     if the tests were changed to focus on where  type of meat, so it impacts all livestock farmers

              words, we       there was an actual human health risk—that is,  and their processors.

                              test for the main strains that cause the most ill-
                                                                           There are several possible outcomes of this
         have a system        nesses, and set a standard based on when there  petition. USDA may simply reject it (as it has
            that doesn’t      is enough salmonella present to make someone  with previous petitions). USDA may identify a
           work to stop       sick. Notably, the agency staff did not disagree  handful of strains as adulterants—which would
                              with the logic of that approach. Instead, the  impose significant burdens on the plants that
              the sale of     staff raised concerns about “perception” and  have those strains present. Arguably, if the
          tainted meat,       the blowback the agency would receive if it was  USDA also stopped the pointless performance
              but that is     viewed as “lowering standards.”          tests for all strains, this could be a good outcome
                                 In  other  words,  we  have  a  system  that  overall. But the USDA may also identify some
              penalizing        doesn’t work to stop the sale of tainted meat,  strains as adulterants and continue with the
                     small    but that is penalizing small producers who  performance testing, which would be the worst
              producers       aren’t selling dangerous products. And they  of both worlds.
             who aren’t       can’t change it because it would look bad.

                                 Lots of people get sick from salmonella,  FARMER WINS LAWSUIT
                   selling    and the agency wants to look like it’s doing  AGAINST BAYER
              dangerous       something and being as strict as possible. The     Shifting attention to the plant side of agri-
               products.      current tests are not only super-sensitive, but  culture, there is some encouraging news. In mid-
                              they are quicker than tests that look for specific  February, a jury found that the agrichemical
                              strains or quantify the levels of bacteria present.  corporations Bayer and BASF should pay two
                              And the situation is evolving. The USDA staff  hundred fifty million dollars in punitive dam-
                              noted a new factor in their considerations: a peti-  ages and fifteen million dollars in compensatory
                              tion filed by Bill Marler, the Seattle lawyer who  damages to farmer Bill Bader.
                              represented hundreds of victims in the Jack in     Bader is a peach farmer in Campbell, Mis-
                              the Box food poisoning case in the 1990s. Two  souri, who sued the companies after more than
                              decades ago, Marler courted the media to get  thirty thousand of his trees were damaged due
                              the E. coli bacteria on the agenda of policymak-  to drifting of dicamba, an herbicide developed
                              ers, and he played a key role in getting USDA  by BASF and Monsanto (purchased by Bayer in
                              to outlaw the most virulent strains of E. coli in  2018). After dicamba damaged the Bader Farms
                              meat. He was a major player in the passage of  trees, the peach harvest dropped from an aver-
                              the Food Safety Modernization Act, and his abil-  age of one hundred sixty-two thousand bushels
                              ity to influence legislators and agency officials  in the early 2000s to twelve thousand bushels
                              should not be underestimated.            in 2018—a loss of more than 92 percent!
                                 Marler recently submitted a petition to     Dicamba is an herbicide used to kill weeds
                              USDA to label thirty-one different strains of  in corn, soybeans and other food crops. By the
                              salmonella as “adulterants,” with a zero-toler-  end of 2020, the EPA must determine whether
                              ance approach. Previous petitions have taken a  to renew the two-year extension it gave in 2018,
                              more reasonable stance, focusing on the three or  allowing farmers to continue its use.
                              four strains that truly cause the most problems.     Monsanto developed dicamba-resistant
                              (USDA rejected the most recent one in 2018.) In  seeds called Xtend to be planted in conjunc-
                              contrast, Marler’s petition includes every strain  tion with the use of the dicamba formulation
                              of salmonella that has made anyone sick in the  Xtendimax. From the beginning, the Xtend
                              last two decades. And it fails to recognize that,  crop system has caused problems for all kinds
                              unlike E. coli, salmonella can be in the animal’s  of farmers. Famers growing both organic and
                              lymph nodes, and thus can be found on the meat  conventional (not genetically-modified) soybean
                              even if there was no fecal contamination.  and cotton have suffered losses. And “specialty
                                 The petition seeks to have these thirty-one  crop” farmers, raising peaches, grapes and broc-
                              strains of salmonella declared adulterants in any  coli, have faced a crisis.
         94                                       Wise Traditions                                 SPRING 2020
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99