Active Ingredients In Vaccines

🖨️ Print post

WHAT’S IN THAT JAB? DISCLOSED INGREDIENTS MAY BE THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG

When preparing for the arrival of a child, parents often make pledges and craft promises to safeguard their newborn’s well-being. Amid the excitement and preparations, however, fewer parents devote meticulous attention to the com­ponents of vaccines (or concoctions marketed as “vaccines”). Delving into this realm may seem scientifically or otherwise daunting, but responsible parents have a duty to understand the substances the medical system proposes administering to their children routinely and the potential impact on their little ones’ health. In short, from the very start parents need to active­ly advocate for their children’s health. Equally important, parents should be well-informed about the contents of adult vaccinations so that they can ensure their own sustained health and presence to nurture and support their children.

Securing the well-being of offspring should begin with thoughtful planning before concep­tion. Unfortunately, the importance of the pre­conception period is often underestimated even by those who carefully ponder their family’s genetic wealth. Aspiring fathers and mothers who approach the preparations for pregnancy conscientiously, including eating a healthy Wise Traditions diet and avoiding toxins, are more likely to be rewarded with a healthy baby than those who listen to advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for women to get a “catch-up” MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine before conception,¹ or who accept the shots that CDC recommends for pregnant women—Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis) or Td (tetanus-diphthe­ria), influenza, Covid-19 and, in some circum­stances, prenatal RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) vaccination.^2,3 A plethora of studies attest to the risks of prenatal vaccination,⁴ including a recent study in rats, which found that prenatal Covid-19 shots induced autism-like behaviors in male neonates.⁵

FDA Vaccine Ingredients

ACTIVE AND “INACTIVE”

Vaccines, which the Food and Drug Ad­ministration (FDA) categorizes as “biological products” rather than drugs, contain multiple categories of ingredients. In addition to the “active” ingredient(s), there are residual trace amounts of materials used during manufactur­ing (such as antibiotics, cell culture materials and the acknowledged carcinogen formalde­hyde)—ostensibly removed by the time the product goes to market—as well as a wide range of supposedly “inactive” and often strange-sounding substances called “excipients.”⁶

In turn, there are several categories of ex­cipients: preservatives (with the mercury com­pound thimerosal, one of the most infamous, still used in some flu shots and the Td vaccine); stabilizers such as gelatin (strongly and causally associated with allergic reactions to vaccines⁷); and neurotoxic adjuvants like aluminum salts.⁸ The lengthy and hardly reassuring list of ex­cipients also includes: compounds like phenol, used as a preservative but “toxic to consume on its own”⁹; sodium borate, commonly found in cleaning products and described as “not safe to consume”¹⁰; polysorbate 80, a “surfactant” associated with anaphylaxis, brain permeabil­ity and cancer¹¹; Triton X-100, a derivative of polyethylene glycol (PEG), structurally similar to polysorbates and, like polysorbate 80, as­sociated with hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reactions11; hydrocortisone, a corticosteroid associated with a lengthy list of “unwanted effects,” including adverse interactions with other drugs¹²; yeast, associated (when present in vaccines) with autoimmune reactions¹³; mono­sodium glutamate (MSG), an excitotoxin that overstimulates nerve cells in the brain, causing them to die¹⁴; egg and milk proteins and bovine (calf) serum, associated with severe allergic reactions in sensitized individuals^15,16; squalene-based adjuvants, linked to narcolepsy and other neurological disorders as well as cancer¹⁷; so-called “virus-like particles,” linked to autoim­munity through a process called “molecular mimicry”¹⁸; and, disturbingly, human, animal and insect DNA that have been found to leave “unacceptably high levels of. . . DNA fragment contaminants” in the final product.¹⁹

What Are Side Effects Of Aluminum In Vaccines?

ALUMINUM. . . AND MORE ALUMINUM

Aluminum, devoid of any biological func­tion, is present in many of the vaccines admin­istered to infants, children and adolescents. These include hepatitis A and B shots (HepA and HepB), Tdap and DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), pneumococcal vaccines (PCV), human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococ­cal B (MenB).²⁰

Newborns, typically within minutes of their entrance into the world, receive a HepB shot containing two hundred fifty micrograms of aluminum adjuvant. At subsequent two, four, six and twelve- to fifteen-month “well-baby checks,” infants whose parents adhere to the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule may receive up to eight hundred fifty micrograms of alumi­num in a single vaccine dose.²¹ Aluminum is also present in the Tdap (or Td) vaccines given to pregnant women.⁴ Research unequivocally indicates that such heightened aluminum ex­posure can precipitate mitochondrial dysfunction and depletion of ATP (adenosine triphosphate), setting the stage for autism and a wide range of other chronic conditions,²² including the potential emergence of Al­zheimer’s in later life.²³

Aluminum’s detrimental impact is most readily discernible in the nervous system, giving rise to issues like motor skill impairment and impaired brain function (encephalopathy).²² However, its harmful effects also extend beyond the neurological domain to encompass adverse effects on the digestive, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems.²⁴ This intricate web of potential consequences underscores how important it is for parents to achieve a comprehensive understanding of vaccine components and their toxic ramifications.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recognizes aluminum as a known neurotoxin,²⁵ and the FDA warns that infants “are at a higher risk from any exposure to aluminum.”²⁶ Nevertheless, vaccines routinely surpass the safety limits set by these very agencies. For instance, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a di­vision within HHS, recommends a “safe” limit for injected aluminum of one mcg/kg/day, but as Physicians for Informed Consent notes, “the cumulative aluminum exposure from vaccines in children less than 1 year old exceeds the ATSDR-derived daily limit by several hundreds.”²⁰ Moreover, injected aluminum bypasses the digestive tract (from where it can be more easily excreted) and instead is absorbed into the bloodstream, traveling “to distant parts of the body, including the brain.”²⁰

SYNERGY IGNORED

The National Vaccine Information Center’s Barbara Loe Fisher points out that individuals vary in their response to vaccine ingredients, influenced by genetics, epigenetics, their microbiome and their health history.²⁷ Another factor undoubtedly shaping vaccine responses is synergistic toxicity. Toxicologists know that toxic substances, in combination, can exert synergistic effects that are worse than those coming from exposure to a single toxin,²⁸ yet despite the strange blend of ingredients and the common practice of administering multiple vaccines in a single appointment, vaccines have never undergone systematic scrutiny for such effects, either in interactions with other vaccines or other drugs or toxins.

Long-term cumulative consequences of vaccination also remain largely unexplored, disregarded by industry and regulators alike. In 2013, the Institute of Medicine (now the Na­tional Academy of Medicine) quietly conceded federal agencies’ apathy, stating in a report that “key elements of the entire [childhood vaccine] schedule—the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at administration of vac­cines—have not been systematically examined in research studies” and adding that such studies were unlikely to happen without “sustained and substantial federal commitment to research on vaccine safety”—a commitment that has never been forthcoming.²⁹

On the contrary, an increasing number of combination vaccines continue to make their way onto the pediatric vaccine schedule. The latest entry is the Merck-Sanofi six-in-one (hexavalent) infant vaccine called Vaxelis, licensed in the U.S. in late 2018 but marketed only recently, recommended by CDC as a three-dose series at two, four and six months of age, or even as early as six weeks of age for the initial dose. Vaxelis bundles DTaP (itself a combina­tion vaccine), Hib, HepB and inactivated polio (IPV) components and contains not one but two aluminum adjuvants—including a notoriously reactive proprietary adjuvant made by Merck thought to be a major contributor to the hor­rific adverse events associated with Merck’s Gardasil vaccine.³⁰ Additional Vaxelis ingre­dients include polysorbate 80, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde (documented to be toxic when inhaled or ingested, with research missing in ac­tion regarding the injection route), bovine serum albumin, three different antibiotics (neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin B sulfate), yeast protein and ammonium thiocyanate, a chemical used in herbicides.⁶

As Children’s Health Defense comments, “How [the] double whammy of aluminum (319 micrograms per vaccine dose) interacts with the vaccine’s six antigens, or Vaxelis’s numer­ous other ingredients, or the heavy aluminum load in other childhood vaccines is largely un­known.”³¹ However, the Vaxelis track record in Europe, where it has been on the market since 2016, suggests an alarming association with sud­den infant death.³² In the combo vaccine’s U.S. clinical trials—skewed to hide adverse events by comparing Vaxelis to a five-in-one vaccine rather than an inert placebo—six infants died, all within six weeks of vaccination, matching “other published accounts of infant deaths ‘clustering’ following hexavalent vaccination.”³¹

SPOTTY DISCLOSURE

Federal law requires that companies mar­keting vaccines in the U.S. disclose information about vaccine ingredients in the manufacturer package inserts³³ that accompany vaccine vials distributed to health care facilities, public health clinics and pharmacies. However, citing propri­etary reasons, biopharmaceutical companies do not always disclose the full list of ingredients³⁴; in other words, we cannot say for certain what is in vaccines. Companies are also supposed to adhere to current good manufacturing prac­tices (cGMP) standards.³⁵ However, there are indications that, for a variety of reasons, what is disclosed in package inserts may not always match what is in the final product. For instance, in a 2021 study in which Christopher Exley and colleagues measured the aluminum content in thirteen widely used childhood vaccines, only three vaccines contained the amounts specified by the manufacturer, with statistically signifi­cant differences for the other ten products; six vaccines had higher levels of aluminum than the amounts cited in the inserts, while four vaccines showed lower quantities.³⁶ There was also wide variability in the aluminum content of each given vaccine.

In 2017, Italian researchers Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari used innova­tive electron microscopy methods to conduct quality-control investigations that highlighted the issue of micro- and nanocontamination in vaccines.³⁷ The study detailed their analysis of forty-four vaccines manufactured in Italy and France. Expected components included saline and aluminum salts, but the two researchers also discovered undisclosed “micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies” in almost all samples. In addition to aluminum debris, they identified metallic nanocontaminants such as antimony, bismuth, chromium, iron, lead, nickel, platinum, scandium, silicon, silver, stain­less steel, tungsten, and vanadium, all having potential health impacts. Gatti and Montanari also emphasized the biopersistence of these par­ticles, highlighting the risk of chronic inflam­matory responses and interactions with cellular DNA. The researchers proposed that the vaccine contaminants could explain both immediate and delayed adverse events, hypothesizing their presence to be the result of “unintentional” con­tamination from polluted components or flawed industrial filtration. (For more information, see my article titled “Tiny but Toxic: Nanoparticles in Vaccines” in the Summer 2021 Wise Traditions.³⁸)

NEXT-GENERATION VACCINE INGREDIENTS

Let’s now take a look at the Covid mRNA shots rolled out in 2021. Focusing solely (for the time being) on the officially disclosed and largely unpronounceable ingredients listed in the package insert of the Pfizer- BioNTech Covid-19 injection, each dose contains thirty micrograms of “a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 strain.” In ad­dition, each dose also includes:

“[L]ipids (0.43 mg ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-dial) bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phos­phocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol), 0.01 mg potassium chloride, 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.36 mg sodium chloride, 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose. The diluent (sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.”³⁹

It is worth noting that, as indicated above, the enigmatic mRNA shots actually are modified mRNA (modRNA), not naturally occurring mes­senger RNA (mRNA); modRNA induces recipients’ bodies to produce random proteins for an undetermined duration, yielding unknown and unpredictable effects.^40,41

Nanotechnology is a key aspect of the shots developed by both Pfizer- BioNTech and Moderna. The injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) as carriers to protect the fragile modRNA from degradation and facilitate its entry into cells. To evade the immune system, the LNPs are coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) through a process known as “PEGylation.” PEGylated compounds are not new to the drug market, but concerns about their adverse effects have been growing, and their inclusion in vac­cines is unprecedented. One of the concerns documented in the scientific literature pertains to the propensity for PEGylated compounds to induce the formation of anti-PEG antibodies,⁴² a heightened immune response that may predispose an estimated 7 percent of the sensitized population to anaphylactic reactions.⁴³

The FDA’s Freedom-of-Information-Act-imposed release of docu­ments pertaining to Pfizer’s Covid injections indicates that the FDA is cognizant of the possibility that the injections may also contain endotox­ins⁴⁴ (lipopolysaccharides contained within the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria capable of triggering “dysfunction of multiple organ systems and mortality”⁴⁵). The E. coli bacteria employed by Pfizer in the production process for its mRNA injections naturally produce endotoxins.

PURPOSEFUL “CONTAMINATION”

Drawing from a robust twenty-five-year career in pharmaceutical re­search and development, Substack⁴⁶ and Brownstone Institute⁴⁷ writer and researcher Sasha Latypova argues that the Covid shots feature harmful components, erroneously framed by some observers as “contaminants,” that are there on purpose. Latypova knows the pharmaceutical industry well, having owned and managed contract research organizations involved in clinical trials for over sixty companies (including industry giants like Pfizer, AstraZeneca, J&J, GSK and Novartis) and having interacted ex­tensively with the FDA and other regulatory bodies. Together with Sub­stack writer Katherine Watt,⁴⁸ Latypova has spent the past several years exposing the unsettling progression of a “bio-chemical-informational war” marketed as a pandemic, outlining the orchestrated media panic, lockdowns, denial of effective treatments and deployment of bioweapons in the form of Covid shots.

Early on, together with software developer Craig Paardekooper and others, Latypova helped highlight the unusual variability in injuries and deaths associated with different batches of the Covid injections, documented at the “How Bad is My Batch” website.⁴⁹ In her keynote address at the 2023 Wise Traditions Conference, titled “Weaponization of Health, Food, and the Environment” (from which I derived much of the information discussed in the remainder of this article), and in her Substack essays, Latypova also has shed light on the fact that the manufacturers of Covid shots were never under any obligation to respect cGMP standards to begin with, thanks to the elaborate “legal cage” that permits Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) “countermeasures” to be manufactured as bioweapons, not biologics. She notes that under the U.S. Code governing “emergency use of medical products” (21 USC 360bbb-3a), the HHS Secretary may “authorize. . . deviations from cur­rent good manufacturing practice requirements otherwise applicable to the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of products” and that when the Secretary authorizes such “deviations,” the products “shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded.”⁵⁰ Latypova sums up the manu­facturer/regulator mindset as, “We know we need to break the law to put this poison on the market, so, we need to make a parallel universe where the illegal things are called legal and we are good. Let’s call it EUA.”⁵¹ She emphasizes that legally, “[c]ountermeasures are. . . not pharmaceutical products.”⁵²

Latypova has collaborated with indepen­dent professionals worldwide to unveil and publicize the blatant evidence of allowed “de­viations” from cGMP—ingredients of unknown origin and purpose—in the “gene therapy” mRNA Covid shots. In her Wise Traditions presentation, she pointed to an article published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research in September 2022, titled “What is in the so-called COVID-19 ‘vaccines’? Part 1: Evidence of a global crime against humanity,”⁵³ by British author David A. Hughes, PhD. Hughes’ article summarizes evidence from twenty-six independent studies conducted from July 2021 to August 2022 in sixteen countries spanning five continents that used scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray microscopy to examine the jabs’ contents. Among the alarming variety of foreign bodies discovered, the studies identified “unexpected metallic elements” in vials of the Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca Covid shots: “caesium, potassium, calcium, barium, cobalt, iron, chromium, titanium, cerium, gadolinium, aluminium, silicon, and sulphur.” In addition, vials were found to contain peculiar structures, including “sharp-edged geometric structures, fibrous or tube-like structures, crystalline formations, ‘microbubbles,’ and possible self-assembling nanotechnology.” Noting that all of the studies “converge[d] on similar findings pointing towards undisclosed ingredients,” Hughes stated, “The unavoidable conclusion is that the publics of all countries have been systematically lied to about the contents of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines.’”⁵³

In 2022, Latypova also reported on a Eu­ropean scientist’s finding of “large amounts” of residual DNA in the Covid mRNA products.⁵⁴ Those findings were reiterated in 2023 by genomic and DNA sequencing expert Kevin McKernan, who detected extensive DNA resi­dues in vials of bivalent and monovalent mRNA shots manufactured by both Pfizer and Mod­erna.⁵⁵ In the bivalent shots, the levels of DNA contamination were “up to 1,000 times higher than deemed to be ‘acceptable’ by the regulating authorities.”⁵⁶ McKernan also discovered the presence—undisclosed by the manufacturers— of a gene associated with cancer called an SV40 promoter. McKernan’s testimony before the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee in June 2023 left the FDA unmoved,^57,58 however, despite clear concerns expressed by McKernan and others about the shots’ potential cancer-inducing effects as well as the risk of DNA integration into host cells.⁵⁹

Someone writing over two decades ago commented that the type of gene manipula­tion that has since come to pass in the Covid shots would be a “next generation” biological weapon.⁶⁰ Officially, Latypova noted at the Wise Traditions conference, the FDA has admitted to possessing regulatory knowledge about the risks of “gene therapy” since at least 2015. In an industry guidance document published that year, titled “Considerations for the Design of Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Cellular and Gene Therapy Products,” FDA explicitly warned that risks could include tumors, multi-organ failure, death and “the possibility of extended or per­manent effects.”⁶¹

In January 2024, Japanese researchers held a press conference at which they brought some of those “extended or permanent effects” to life, asserting that the Covid injections adversely “affect[] every possible aspect of human pa­thology” and are linked to over two hundred types of diseases, including “diseases of the heart, kidney, thyroid, diabetes, liver, skin, eyes, blood, nerves, systemic diseases, brain, lungs.”⁶² One of the researchers bluntly summarized, “It’s very clear what happens when you administer a toxic gene to a human.”

In her Wise Traditions talk, Latypova is­sued a stark warning about the growing adoption of mRNA/DNA technologies in animal vaccines and food, noting disturbing implications for the safety of our food supply. Citing a 2018 National Institutes of Health (NIH) publication titled Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology,⁶³ she underscored the NIH’s awareness that the microbiome—“far easier to manipulate than the human host itself”—could be a “potentially accessible vector for attack.” The publication describes the “delivery of harmful cargo via microbiome,” such as “RNA and plasmid DNA or viral vectors” administered “via injections or horizontal transfer (shedding),” even suggesting that “domestic animals could be used as carriers for engineered agents transmitted via the mi­crobiome.” Esteemed gastroenterologist Sabine Hazan, MD and colleagues have, in fact, high­lighted the detrimental effects of the Covid shots on the human microbiome, particularly noting the associated destruction of Bifidobacteria; they point out that the decline in Bifidobacteria is linked to health conditions such as inflam­matory bowel disease, obesity, neurological disorders and C. difficile overgrowth as well as symptoms labeled as “severe Covid-19.”⁶⁴

MISPLACED TRUST

In late 2023, a report emerged showing that recalls of pharmaceutical products in the U.S. had reached their highest point in a decade, with a record-breaking one hundred forty-four recalls in the first quarter of 2023 and one hun­dred thirty-five in the second quarter, as well as one hundred seven in the third quarter.⁶⁵ The top three reasons cited for the recalls were lack of sterility (a problem affecting over four million products), “failed specifications” (issues related to impurities and product stability) and the violation of cGMP regulations. Meanwhile, consumer polls repeatedly indicate that the pharmaceutical industry is “the most loathed sector in America.”⁶⁶

In this context, calls to place our trust in pharmaceutical companies and their complicit regulators, the FDA and CDC, are misplaced. These entities are now urging the public to com­ply with a bloated childhood vaccine schedule that as of 2024 comprises seventy-six or more doses of eighteen vaccines.⁶⁷ Parents must un­derstand their unique responsibility to acquire the knowledge and information that make truly informed consent possible. This includes scrutinizing vaccine package inserts but also understanding that in the “wild West” of mRNA jabs and undisclosed ingredients, those inserts will not tell the whole story.

Additionally, it is our duty to advocate for the legal right to exercise flexible medical, religious and conscientious belief exemptions to vaccination, and keep informed consent to medical risk-taking at the center of medical ethics.⁶⁸ We must also always bear in mind that, unlike the situation with prescription drugs, manufacturers and health care professionals administering vaccines are not liable when a person is injured after receiving a childhood vaccine licensed by the FDA and recommended by the CDC as “safe and effective.”⁶⁹

When we promise to keep our children safe, we need to understand that when we give them “routine” vaccinations, we are exposing them to some of the most toxic substances on the planet. Studies have clearly shown that the mercury and aluminum compounds in “tradi­tional” vaccines are linked to the disastrous rise in autism^70,71—which now affects an estimated one in thirty-six children and one in twenty-two boys^72,73—and we have barely begun to grasp the calamitous impacts of the disclosed and undisclosed ingredients present in the growing crop of mRNA injections.

If the idea of introducing aluminum, deter­gent or shark liver extract via vaccines made from cell lines derived from aborted fetuses into your child’s body is incongruent with your belief in human beings’ inherent perfection, you are not alone. The World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the media and other entities may try to continue spreading fear through concepts like “Disease X” (the specu­lative new “pandemic” threat that doomsayers claim will generate twenty times more fatalities than Covid-19), but I remain skeptical. I encour­age you to do the same and to ignore, to the extent possible, our public servants’ June 2023 introduction of the “Disease X Act of 2023” (H.R.3832).⁷⁴ Personally, I find solace in steer­ing clear of many substances that governmental agencies assert are safe, such as genetically modified synthetic milk containing ninety-two unidentified molecules and a fungicide in its protein.⁷⁵ Instead, I choose to nurture my fam­ily’s body, mind and soul with wholesome foods and alternative forms of medicine.

As for vaccines, whether we consider the uncertainties about their contents, “bad batches,” the neurotoxic ingredients in “tradi­tional” vaccines, poor manufacturing processes, fraudulent clinical trials or the many unknowns related to newer vaccine technologies, there are too many fundamental issues to ignore. Unfor­tunately, as some of these mysteries persist, the injuries continue to accumulate.

---

SIDEBARS

A “PSEUDO-LEGAL” STRUCTURE

Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have extensively dissected the “pseudo-legal” structure constructed to carry out the “Covid Crime.” Among other legal building blocks, they note that the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act⁷⁶ and the declaration of a Public Health Emergency (PHE)⁷⁷ (with the Covid “emergency” ex­tended and amended eleven times since February 2020⁷⁸) are mechanisms that effectively permit the unregulated use of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) countermeasures⁷⁹ and the suspension of the Constitution.⁸⁰ According to Watt, the Covid operation amounts to a large-scale “American domestic bioterrorism program,” rebranded as a public health initiative. Describing the crescendo of enabling laws passed especially since 2000, Watt comments, “A whole lot of things that once were federal and state crimes and civil rights violations have been legalized by Congress through legislative, statutory revisions to the United States Code, signed by US Presidents, and implemented at the administrative, regulatory level by [HHS] and Department of Defense [DOD] through the Code of Federal Regulations.”⁸¹

Latypova emphasizes that DOD ordered all Covid countermeasures, “typically as ‘demonstrations’” through a type of contract called “Other Transactions Authority” (OTA), and oversaw their development, manufacture and distribution.80 She continues, “Senior Executive Service officials within the U.S. Government authorized and funded the deployment of bio-chemical poisons on Americans and others without clarifying their ‘prototype’ and ‘large scale demonstration’ legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while knowingly and willfully maintaining a fraudulent pseudo-‘regulatory’ presentation to the public. These poisons have harmed and killed and continue to harm and kill Americans and other people around the world.”⁸⁰

VACCINE POISON IN YOUR MEAT

The extension of mRNA “vaccines” to the meat industry raises significant concerns. Proponents argue that they offer a potential solution to control and eliminate diseases threatening animal health and producer livelihoods. Skeptics such as Sasha Latypova raise concerns about the potential adverse effects on consumer health from consuming meat and milk from mRNA-injected animals.

As of now, mRNA jabs have not yet made their way to U.S. cattle, but Merck’s Sequivity, featuring “RNA particle technology,” is licensed for use in pigs.⁸² Latypova’s investigation into this product’s trials revealed a 30 percent rate of adverse events and death within twenty-one days of swine vaccination and raised a number of questions. For example, does the affected portion of the herd end up in the food supply? What about the health of workers exposed to these animals?

Latypova’s presentation at the 2023 Wise Traditions conference listed a number of other existing DNA/RNA vaccines for animals and fish:

• APEX-IHN (Novartis/Elanco) for Atlantic salmon against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV)
• West Nile Innovator-DNA (Fort Dodge Animal Health/Pfizer) for West Nile virus in condors and horses
• Oncept (Merial) against dog melanoma
• CLYNAV (Elanco), a polyprotein-encoding DNA vaccine against salmon pancreas disease virus (SPDV) infection in Atlantic salmon

Noting that DNA plasmid vaccines could circumvent GMO labels, Latypova warned of potentially severe risks to the human biome if these food products are incorporated into consumers’ genomes or taken up by their gut microflora. Despite regulatory claims that DNA plasmids are quickly eliminated in the food supply, a study from Italy found them in fish muscle three hundred twenty days post-vaccination.⁸³

---

REFERENCES

1. Vaccines during pregnancy FAQs. Centers for Dis­ease Control and Prevention, last reviewed Aug. 24, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-pregnancy.html
2. Vaccines during and after pregnancy. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, last reviewed Sep. 29, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/vacc-during-after.html
3. Nelson K. Navigating novel RSV vaccines amid a complex history. Wise Traditions. Winter 2023;24(4):62-67.
4. Children’s Health Defense Team. That was then, this is now: open season on vaccinating pregnant women. Children’s Health Defense, Apr. 23, 2018.
5. Erdogan MA, Gurbuz O, Bozkurt MF, et al. Prenatal exposure to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 induces autism-like behaviors in male neonatal rats: insights into WNT and BDNF signaling perturba­tions. Neurochem Res. 2024 Jan 10.
6. Vaccine excipient summary. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf
7. Teller M. Alpha-gal syndrome and ticks: a false trail? Wise Traditions. Spring 2020;21(1):49-54.
8. Imus D. Toxic vaccine ingredients: the devil is in the details. Children’s Health Defense, Mar. 6, 2018.
9. Jewell T. What are the medical and health uses for phenol? Healthline, Jan. 26, 2019.
10. Curtis L. Sodium borate: is it safe? Verywell Health, Sep. 21, 2023.
11. Children’s Health Defense Team. These “inactive” ingredients in COVID vaccines could trigger allergic reactions. The Defender, Mar. 12, 2021.
12. Hydrocortisone (injection route). Mayo Clinic, last updated Feb. 1, 2024. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/hydrocortisone-injection-route/side-effects/drg-20406236
13. Stevenson H. Yeast in vaccines tied to autoimmune diseases. Children’s Health Defense, Mar. 27, 2018.
14. Morell SF. Excitotoxins by Russell Blaylock: a thumbs up book review. WAPF, Jan. 1, 2000.
15. Yavuz ST, Sahiner UM, Sekerel BE, et al. Anaphylactic reactions to measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in three children with allergies to hen’s egg and cow’s milk. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Aug;100(8):e94-e96.
16. De Silva R, Dasanayake WMDK, Wickramasinhe GD, et al. Sensitization to bovine serum albumin as a possible cause of allergic reactions to vaccines. Vaccine. 2017 Mar 13;35(11):1494-1500.
17. Kennedy Jr. RF. Half a million sharks could be killed to make vaccine. Children’s Health Defense, Oct. 1, 2020.
18. Baletti B. Merck’s Gardasil HPV vaccine caused teen’s narcolepsy, federal vaccine court rules. The Defender, Oct. 4, 2023.
19. Deisher TA, Doan NV, Koyama K, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular relationship between vaccine manufacture and autism spectrum disorder prevalence. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70.
20. Aluminum in vaccines: what parents need to know. Physicians for Informed Con­sent, Aug. 2020, updated Apr. 2023. https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/aluminum-in-vaccines/
21. Lyons-Weiler J, Ricketson R. Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018 Jul;48:67-73.
22. Shaw CA, Tomljenovic L. Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity. Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;56(2-3):304-316.
23. Mold M, Linhart C, Gómez-Ramírez J, Villegas-Lanau A, Exley C. Aluminum and amyloid-β in familial Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(4):1627-1635.
24. Igbokwe IO, Igwenagu E, Igbokwe NA. Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2019 Oct;12(2):45-70.
25. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Aluminum. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, September 2008, pp. 13-24, 145, 171-177, 208. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp22.pdf
26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Rules and regulations. Fed Regist. 2003 Jun 9;68(110):34286. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2003-06-09/pdf/03-14140.pdf
27. Fisher BL. Are vaccine ingredients safe? National Vaccine Information Center, Jan. 26, 2018.
28. Singh N, Gupta VK, Kumar A, et al. Synergistic effects of heavy metals and pes­ticides in living systems. Front Chem. 2017 Oct 11;5:70.
29. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Assessment of Studies of Health Outcomes Related to the Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule. The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety: Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence, and Future Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013, pp. 11, 15.
30. Redwood L. Court hears Gardasil science and moves forward. Children’s Health Defense, Jan. 29, 2019.
31. Children’s Health Defense Team. CDC, FDA prepare mass distribution of a Merck/ Sanofi six-in-one vaccine for kids, turning blind eye to safety signals. The Defender, Jun. 25, 2021.
32. Children’s Health Defense Team. A six-in-one vaccine associated with sudden infant death. Children’s Health Defense, Mar. 5, 2020.
33. Vaccines licensed for use in the United States. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, content current as of Dec. 1, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaccines-licensed-use-united-states
34. Gardasil ingredients – the adjuvants. Wisner Baum, n.d. https://www.wisnerbaum.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/gardasil-ingredients/
35. Covarrubias CE, Rivera TA, Soto CA, et al. Current GMP standards for the pro­duction of vaccines and antibodies: an overview. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1021905.
36. Shardlow E, Linhart C, Connor S, Softely E, Exley C. The measurement and full statistical analysis including Bayesian methods of the aluminium content of infant vaccines. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2021 Jul;66:126762.
37. Gatti AM, Montanari S. New quality-control investigations on vaccines: micro- and nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin. 2017;4(1):00072.
38. Nelson K. Tiny but toxic: nanoparticles in vaccines. Wise Traditions. Summer 2021;22(2):77-88.
39. Covid-19 vaccine Pfizer prescribing information. 13: Covid-19 vaccine Pfizer description. https://www.drugs.com/pro/covid-19-vaccine-pfizer.html#s-34089-3
40. https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471
41. Granados-Riveron JT, Aquino-Jarquin G. Engineering of the current nucleoside-modified mRNA-LNP vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;142:111953.
42. Kozma GT, Shimizu T, Ishida T, et al. Anti-PEG antibodies: properties, formation, testing and role in adverse immune reactions to PEGylated nano-biopharmaceuti­cals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;154-155:163-175.
43. Yang Q, Jacobs TM, McCallen JD, et al. Analysis of pre-existing IgG and IgM antibodies against polyethylene glycol (PEG) in the general population. Anal Chem. 2016;88(23):11804-11812.
44. https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/53_2_BLA-125742-0_08-06-2021_Telecon_Information-Reques.pdf
45. Zivot JB, Hoffman WD. Pathogenic effects of endotoxin. New Horiz. 1995 May;3(2):267-75.
46. https://substack.com/@sashalatypova
47. https://brownstone.org/author/sasha-latypova/
48. https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews
49. https://howbadismybatch.com/
50. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title%3A21%20section%3A360bbb-3a%20edition%3Aprelim)
51. Latypova S. EUA countermeasures are neither investigational nor experimental! Due Diligence and Art, Dec. 2, 2023.
52. Latypova S. Intent to harm. Due Diligence and Art, Dec. 13, 2022.
53. Hughes DA. What is in the so-called COVID-19 “vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a global crime against humanity. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. 2022;2(2):455-586.
54. Latypova S. More vials tested – more evidence of product adulteration. Team Enigma, Jul. 14, 2022. https://www.bitchute.com/video/2Uo3t2cTgjq0/
55. McKernan K, Helbert Y, Kane LT, et al. Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose. OSF Preprints, Apr. 10, 2023.
56. Sladden J, Gillespie J. The vax-gene files: an accidental discovery. Brownstone Institute, May 27, 2023.
57. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 182nd Meeting of Vaccines and Related Vio­logical Products Advisory Committee, Jun. 15, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOyPREXGh8
58. “Kevin McKernan Presents Evidence of COVID-19 Vaccine Contamination to the FDA VRBPAC Advisory Committee.” Jun. 15, 2023. https://twitter.com/TheChief­Nerd/status/1669443898547003399?s=20
59. Baker A. Florida Surgeon General, scientist warn of cancer risk linked to mRNA COVID shots contaminated with DNA. The Vaccine Reaction, Dec. 18, 2023.
60. Ainscough MJ. Next generation bioweapons: genetic engineering and biological warfare. Extracted from “The Gathering Biological Warfare Storm,” 2002. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_virus08.htm
61. Considerations for the design of early-phase clinical trials of cellular and gene therapy products: guidance for industry. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, June 2015. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considerations-design-early-phase-clinical-trials-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products
62. Harding L. Japanese researchers say side effects of COVID vaccines linked to 201 types of diseases. Western Standard, Jan. 15, 2024.
63. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technol­ogy; Committee on Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities Posed by Synthetic Biology. Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2018 Jun. 19.
64. Hazan S, Dave S, Barrows B, et al. Persistent damage to the gut microbiome following messenger RNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct;117(10S):e1429-e1430.
65. Parpia R. Recalls of U.S. pharmaceutical products highest in decade. The Vaccine Reaction, Dec. 26, 2023.
66. Poll shows Americans are fed up with pharmaceutical industry. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2019.
67. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/index.html
68. Fisher BL. Forced vaccination: the tragic legacy of Jacobson v. Massachusetts. National Vaccine Infor­mation Center, Nov. 2, 2016.
69. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. National Vaccine Information Center, updated Nov. 17, 2023. https://www.nvic.org/law-policy-federal/vaccine-injury-compensation/1986-national-child­hood-vaccine-injury-act
70. Walia A. Large study concludes mercury can now be listed “as a cause of autism.” Nexus­Newsfeed.com, n.d. https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/large-study-con­cludes-mercury-can-now-be-listed-as-a-cause-of-autism/?fbclid=IwAR1HPg3nISfTCGTTVdZ1gquFo8ovs_yVgvkwG_7EMtwQkXxCcIF7P7V_j0g#.X3o79QQOSFg.facebook
71. Jafari Mohammadabadi H, Rahmatian A, Sayehmiri F, et al. The relationship between the level of copper, lead, mercury and autism disorders: a meta-analysis. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2020 Sep 21;11:369-378.
72. Data & statistics on autism spectrum disorder. Cen­ters for Disease Control and Prevention, last reviewed Apr. 4, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
73. A snapshot of autism spectrum disorder in California. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, last re­viewed Mar. 23, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/addm-community-report/california.html
74. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3832?loclr=cga-bill
75. Henein M. Got GMO synthetic milk? Maryam He­nein, Jan. 12, 2024.
76. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. HHS, Administration for Strategic Preparedness & Response, n.d. https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/default.aspx
77. Public Health Emergency declaration Q&As. HHS, Administration for Strategic Preparedness & Re­sponse, n.d. https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/Pages/phe-qa.aspx
78. Latypova S. Covid and Marburg weapons systems. Due Diligence and Art, May 28, 2023.
79. Emergency Use Authorization for vaccines ex­plained. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, content current as of Nov. 20, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
    80. Latypova S. Summary of everything and quick links, updated – year end 2023. Due Diligence and Art, Jun. 26, 2023.
80. Watt K. American domestic bioterrorism program. Bailiwick News, Apr. 28, 2022.
81. https://www.merck-animal-health-usa.com/news­room/merck-animal-health-introduces-sequivity-technology
82. Marsella A, Pascoli F, Pretto T, et al. Efficacy of DNA vaccines in protecting rainbow trout against VHS and IHN under intensive farming conditions. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;10(12):2062.

This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2024

🖨️ Print post