Over Vaccination In Humans

🖨️ Print post

THE EVER-EXPANDING PUSH FOR A LIFETIME OF SHOTS

Renowned environmentalist and author Terry Tempest Williams has written, “The eyes of the future are looking back at us, and they are praying for us to see beyond our own time.” Wil­liams may not have penned those words about vaccines, but they resonate deeply in the context of vaccination. Her call to stewardship—of the land, of life, of future generations—reminds us of our responsibility to protect what is most pre­cious. That responsibility includes safeguarding both our freedoms and the health of our children. But are we honoring that responsibility?

As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) unveils its 2025 immuniza­tion schedule,¹ over two hundred routine vac­cine doses are now recommended throughout a person’s lifetime—eighty-five to eighty-eight of which are aimed at children ages zero to eigh­teen (see Tables 1 and 2).² By their first birthday, infants are slated to receive eighteen-plus doses of vaccines targeting a staggering array of de­clared pathogens—including Covid, diphtheria, hepatitis A and B, influenza, measles, mumps, pertussis, pneumococcal infections, polio, respi­ratory syncytial virus (RSV), rotavirus, rubella, tetanus and varicella.² For comparison, in 1983, the CDC recommended a total of eleven doses (three rounds of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis [DTP] combination vaccine and two rounds of polio) before age one.³ [Note: For the purposes of this article, I am counting each vaccine com­ponent individually. The DTP combination vac­cine, which includes three distinct components in a single shot, counts as three doses.]

Meanwhile, rates of chronic illness, autoim­mune disorders and developmental challenges in both children and adults continue to surge, rais­ing critical questions. Are vaccines safeguard­ing health or playing a role in its decline? Are we prioritizing obedience over well-being—driven by fear of scrutiny or reluctance to challenge the status quo?

THE INUNDATION BEGINS BEFORE BIRTH

It all begins before babies take their first breath. The CDC’s 2025 schedule includes six vaccines for pregnant women, including the Covid injections (Table 3), each imprinting itself on the delicate, developing immune system of the unborn child.^4,5 But the exposure doesn’t even start there; many women are also urged to receive vaccines before pregnancy—such as hepatitis A and B and travel-related shots—all under the banner of “preparation” and “protec­tion.” The campaign is relentless, from flu shots to the newly recommended RSV vaccine.⁶

Public health and medical personnel en­courage pregnant women to get vaccinated despite having historically considered pregnant women as a vulnerable population that, for ethi­cal reasons, should more often than not be ex­cluded from drug safety and efficacy trials.^7,8 A recent review of data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) identified thirty-seven potential adverse effects linked to administration of Covid injections during pregnancy. The effects included miscarriage, preeclampsia, cervical insufficiency, chro­mosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, premature birth, stillbirth, newborn asphyxia and infant death. Notably, pregnancy-related complications occurred over sixty-nine times more frequently after the Covid shots compared to other vaccines.⁹

TABLES 1-3: CDC-Recommended Vaccine Schedules for Children, Adults and Pregnant Women

 

CUSTOMERS FOR LIFE

One of the most indefensible acts of medical overreach is the hepatitis B vaccine, administered to newborns within hours of birth. Hepatitis B is said to spread through intrave­nous drug use, promiscuous sexual contact or contaminated blood¹⁰—realities as foreign to an infant as the concept of risk itself. These tiny, vulnerable lives face no plausible threat of infection outside of extreme scenarios, yet the CDC insists on universal vaccination, bypassing logic entirely. Why?

By anchoring this vaccine to birth, Big Pharma secures a lifelong revenue stream—every infant may become a profit statistic. But the agenda runs deeper. The hepatitis B shot, loaded with two hundred fifty micrograms of aluminum¹¹—a neurotoxin with no safe threshold for in­fants—serves as a Trojan horse. It destabilizes developing immune and neurological systems, priming children for a cascade of chronic conditions, including autoimmune dysfunction, speech delays and sensory disorders.¹² This is not protection; it is population-wide sabotage. Injure children early, and you create perpetual customers who become reliant on medications, therapies and interventions sold by the same industry that poisoned them.

The timing is deliberate. By injecting newborns before they leave the hospital, subsequent adverse reactions—colic, seizures, failure to thrive—can be conveniently dismissed as “genetic” or “idiopathic.” Meanwhile, no one discusses aluminum’s impact on the young brain.¹³ Grieving parents, gaslit by a system complicit in this betrayal, are left to ponder the unanswerable question, “What happened to my child?”

The deeper implications of the “early-and-often” childhood vaccine schedule remain largely unexplored. Researchers who attempt to examine these questions typically find themselves ostracized, their findings dis­missed or retracted. If the goal of vaccination were truly public health, the resistance to scrutiny would be illogical, and policymakers would demand rigorous, long-term studies on the unintended consequences of mass vaccination. Instead, we see authorities systematically downplay or ignore vaccination’s far-from-negligible risks. Where the childhood vaccine schedule is concerned, not one of the eighteen “routine” vaccines on the CDC schedule has undergone rigorous, independent oversight. The lack of long-term pre-licensure, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using inert placebos leaves critical safety questions unanswered, yet the public is expected to trust the system without question.^14,15

Seldom do parents receive information about the potential dangers of co-administering multiple vaccines, the long-term effects of specific vaccine ingredients or even whether these interventions are needed at all. The Engerix-B (hepatitis B) information sheet alone lists fifty potential adverse events, including encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, seizures and paralysis.¹⁶ The warnings are not arbitrary—the FDA requires manufacturers to disclose risks “reasonably” linked to vac­cines—yet no crucial safety studies needed to confirm or deny these risks scientifically have been done. Most parents remain in the dark about these glaring research gaps.

OVERVACCINATED ADULTS

Though much of the vaccine debate centers on children, adults are now the next frontier for an aggressive vaccination agenda. The CDC’s 2025 schedule recommends over one hundred thirty doses throughout adulthood,¹⁷ extending its grip to everyone from college students to seniors. Flu shots, Covid boosters, shingles vac­cines, pneumococcal injections, hepatitis A and B, RSV shots—the list grows yearly, bolstered by billion-dollar marketing campaigns.

The pressure is particularly intense for older adults. The CDC is peddling high-dose flu shots and the latest RSV vaccine as “es­sential” though its own website describes flu shots as being, on average, only 41 percent “ef­fective”; CDC also discloses effectiveness as low as 19 percent in some seasons.¹⁸ Instead of reevaluating the necessity of the shots, officials double down, introducing more potent versions loaded with mercury and immune-stimulating adjuvants, with little concern for the long-term consequences.

GROUNDBREAKING STUDY ON NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS

A January 2025 peer-reviewed study, “Vac­cination and neurodevelopmental disorders: a study of nine-year-old children enrolled in Medicaid,”¹⁹ sheds light on some of the deeply disturbing risks associated with the current vaccine schedule. Analyzing data from over forty-seven thousand children enrolled in Florida’s Medicaid program from birth to age nine, researchers found that vaccinated children were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) than their unvaccinated counterparts.

For example, among preterm children, those who received vaccinations had a 39.9 percent rate of NDD diagnosis, compared to 15.7 per­cent among unvaccinated preterm children—a shocking 3.58-fold increased risk. Children with eleven or more vaccination appointments were 4.4 times more likely to receive an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis than those who remained unvaccinated. Other disorders showed even more dramatic disparities; vacci­nated children had a 530 percent higher risk of developing tic disorders, a 420 percent higher risk of encephalopathy and a 312 percent higher risk of learning disabilities.

In 2023, the CDC reported that autism af­fected one in thirty-six children and one in twen­ty-two boys in the U.S.²⁰ In Northern Ireland, the reported rate as of 2023 was even higher—one in twenty children and one in twelve boys.²¹ As officials stick to the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe—and claim that rising ASD diagnoses simply reflect “increased awareness and better detection”—the fact re­mains that diagnostic criteria for autism have remained unchanged for decades.

NORMALIZING AND MISDIRECTING

The push to normalize autism has taken another troubling turn with the February 2025 release of Bill Gates’ autobiography, Source Code. Gates suggests that if he were a child to­day, he would likely be diagnosed with autism, and he even describes his so-called “neurodiver­gent traits” as beneficial.²² This perspective may be presented as “progressive,” but it overlooks the reality faced by countless families rais­ing children with severe autism. Equating his self-described quirks with the profound, often debilitating challenges experienced by many is not only dismissive but deeply insensitive. Minimizing the struggles of those directly af­fected while refusing to acknowledge vaccines as potential contributors to the autism epidemic is not progress—it is denial.

This kind of misdirection is what former high-level pharmaceutical industry contractor Sasha Latypova calls “ABV brainwashing”— “Anything But Vaccines.”²³ Latypova often exposes the deliberate manipulation of con­versations about health risks to steer the public away from questioning vaccines. As influencers, medical professionals and health organiza­tions—many with financial ties to pharmaceu­tical interests—sound the alarm about toxins in Starbucks cups, they strategically ignore the vaccine elephant in the room. Fixating on other marginal risks while drowning out legitimate concerns about vaccine safety ensures that one of the most significant drivers of chronic illness remains shielded from scrutiny.

Yes, we live in a toxic world; environmental toxins like pesticides, fluoride, EMF radiation and aerial spraying (“chemtrails”) are clearly problems. However, dwelling on these while ignoring vaccines is missing the forest for the trees. All other exposures being equal, films like Vaxxed II: The People’s Truth²⁴ and the many studies described in the 2023 book by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brian Hooker, Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak,²⁵ vividly illustrate the dif­ference between vaccinated children and their healthy, vibrant, unvaccinated counterparts.

WEAPONS DISGUISED AS MEDICINE

Once one admits that vaccines are not the life-saving miracles they are marketed to be, it is difficult not to conclude that they are, in reality, weapons disguised as medicine. Con­sider their toxic ingredients: neurotoxic heavy metals like mercury (in the form of thimerosal), aluminum adjuvants, DNA fragments, carrier proteins, metallic contaminants and nanopar­ticles, glyphosate, antibiotics such as neomycin, squalene, polysorbate 80 and carcinogenic formaldehyde.^26,27 These are just a few of the harmful substances deliberately injected into bodies, often without full disclosure or informed consent. The presence of such toxins cannot help but raise serious questions about vaccination’s true purpose.

In a new peer-reviewed study²⁸ that presents what it describes as irrefutable evidence of harm caused by the Covid-19 “vaccines,” the authors join the chorus of experts worldwide who are calling for the shots’ immediate withdrawal from the market. The researchers’ analysis of global safety data and post-marketing surveil­lance reports shows that the mRNA shots are linked to a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than officially acknowledged, including cardiovascular complications, im­mune dysregulation and excess mortality. Deaths reported to the CDC “far exceed the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals. . . by up to 375,340%,” the authors note.

A study published in December 2024 on ResearchGate furnishes additional clues regard­ing the possible underlying agenda. The paper, titled “Anatomy of a complex psyop scam: Deagel depopulation forecast increases with scheduled childhood vaccination doses,”²⁹ dis­cusses Deagel’s financial and military forecasts for the “military-industrial complex” and its predictions for 2025. After studying the Dea­gel predictions “from every direction,” author Herve Seligmann observes, “childhood vaccines contribute to, rather than prevent, depopula­tion.” Adding a comment about the assumptions underpinning the model, he also states, “Those who created the forecast model do not consider that vaccines save lives, but the exact opposite.”

As explained in a January 2025 paper published by Correlation, a Canadian nonprofit research organization, claims by public health agencies and top medical journals that childhood vaccination prevents millions of deaths annually are “counterfactual” and based on flawed epidemiological models.³⁰ In the paper, all-cause mortality expert Denis Rancourt, PhD argues that such claims rely on “tentative and untethered models of epidemiological forecast­ing” that produce “unlikely results” and depend entirely on invalid estimates of vaccine efficacy and disease prevalence. The models also fail to account for other complex factors contribut­ing to child mortality—including nutritional deficiency, toxic exposures and poverty—par­ticularly in the low-income countries where most of the “millions of lives” are purportedly saved. All-cause mortality data furnish not a single example of a decline in infant or child mortality temporally associated with the rollout of a childhood vaccination program.

A SPIRITUAL CRISIS?

Importantly, concerns about vaccination’s risks extend beyond physical health. As if the erosion of bodily autonomy through coerced vaccination weren’t troubling enough, emerging research suggests an even deeper threat—one that may reach into the very essence of human nature. A thought-provoking hypothesis posits that certain medical interventions, including vaccines, could have effects that influence not only neurological but spiritual faculties.

In his 2004 book The God Gene: How Faith Is Hardwired into Our Genes,³¹ geneti­cist Dean Hamer suggested that a gene called VMAT2 (vesicular monoamine transporter 2) may be linked to spiritual experiences, moral reasoning and the deep sense of connection to something greater than oneself. A provocative 2023 paper titled “Vaccines devised to delete the God gene”³² raises questions about whether the Covid jabs may have contained “VMAT2- deleting” ingredients aimed at “inoculating the population against God and spirituality.” If true, this would mean that these and other vaccines are not merely medical interventions but instruments of control designed not only to manipulate physical health but to alter human consciousness itself.

Are we witnessing a campaign against the very qualities that define us as free-thinking, spiritually aware beings? If vaccines have the potential to shape not just our bodies but our minds and souls, then we must ask: What is the true purpose of this agenda?

OTHER HOLES IN THE NARRATIVE

The foundational premise of virology—that invisible, pathogenic viruses invade the body and cause disease—has never been scien­tifically validated. Doctors like Tom Cowan, Samantha Bailey and Andrew Kaufman have meticulously dissected the flawed methodolo­gies behind so-called viral isolation, revealing that what mainstream science presents as proof of pathogenic viruses is nothing more than laboratory artifacts, misinterpretations and circular reasoning. The very idea that germs are the root cause of disease is a dogma that falls apart under scrutiny. Instead, illness arises from toxic exposures, malnutrition and other environmental stressors that compromise the body’s natural balance.

In this light, vaccinology is not just an inef­fective intervention but an outright deception— a carefully crafted illusion designed to sustain industry and perpetuate other hidden agendas while keeping the true causes of disease hidden. If the existence of pathogenic viruses cannot be proven, then the entire justification for vaccines collapses, exposing them not as medicine but as instruments of harm and control.

In practice, if not by law, the CDC’s vac­cine schedule is treated as compulsory. Schools, pediatricians and even workplaces enforce the CDC “recommendations” through measures such as expelling unvaccinated children, refus­ing medical care and restricting employment and travel opportunities. This level of coercion raises alarming questions about personal free­dom and informed choice.

TIME TO END THE DANGEROUS EXPERIMENT

It’s time to confront the truth: vaccines are a dangerous experiment imposed on the public without informed consent or account­ability. With hundreds of new vaccines in development—including experimental mRNA injections for cancer³³ and vaccines targeting obesity³⁴—the U.S. government and its pharma­ceutical industry partners are rapidly expanding their reach, pushing for more untested and inva­sive interventions under the guise of “progress.” The government already has stockpiles of bird flu vaccines for humans³⁵ and just “conditionally” licensed a bird flu vac­cine for commercial poultry³⁶ that could indirectly convey more poisons into the human body via the food supply.

Regulators’ refusal to study the long-term effects of the heavy vaccine schedule is telling. A responsible public health system would investigate the horrifying trends in death and chronic disease rather than dismiss them. The science is clear: there is no such thing as a safe vaccine. The notion of “greening” vaccines (removing harmful ingredients to make them safer) is a myth designed to placate without addressing the funda­mental issues. Vaccines are unsafe by design, filled with toxic substances that have no place in the human body.

Protecting future generations demands critical thinking, courage and a willingness to challenge a seventy-eight-billion-dollar global industry³⁷ and demand greater transparency, rigorous independent research and a reevaluation of vaccine policies. The stakes are too high to remain silent. It’s time to reject the illusion of vaccine safety, expose the institutions perpetuating this global experiment and fight to protect the health and freedom of future generations. “The eyes of the future” are pleading with us to see clearly, question boldly and remember that health is not just a statistic—it is the legacy we leave behind.

---

SIDEBAR

POLITELLA V. WINDHAM
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS IMPORTANT CASE FOR PARENTAL RIGHTS AND BODILY AUTONOMY
Tony and Shu-jen Politella’s six-year-old son Leone was vaccinated with an experimental COVID-19 shot at a clinic
held at his Vermont public school, though Tony had visited the school and specifically requested that his son not be vaccinated.
The parents sued the school for violating their parental rights, but the Vermont Supreme Court dismissed their
claims as federally preempted by the PREP Act. The Politellas have filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari before the United States Supreme Court as their last resort to overturn this unconscionable ruling, which bears on the parental rights of all Americans. Supporters can watch a brief video of the Politellas telling their story, or support their legal effort, here:
https://givebutter.com/j1vdDO

---

REFERENCES

1. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/index.html
2. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html
3. https://www.nvic.org/getmedia/42839af8-1cb5-410d-9144-61ddd495ce50/1983vs2023-English.pdf
4. Quincer EM, Cranmer LM, Kamidani S. Prenatal maternal immunization for infant protec­tion: a review of the vaccines recommended, infant immunity and future research directions. Pathogens. 2024 Feb 23;13(3):200.
5. Wilcox CR, Jones CE. Beyond passive immunity: is there priming of the fetal immune system following vaccination in pregnancy and what are the potential clinical implications? Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1548.
6. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/recommended-vaccines/index.html
7. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#46.207
8. Children’s Health Defense Team. That was then, this is now: open season on vaccinating pregnant women. Children’s Health Defense, Apr. 23, 2018.
9. Thorp JA, Benavides A, Thorp MM, et al. Are COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy as safe and effective as the medical industrial complex claim? Part I. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Feb;v6.2019-2025.
10. Hepatitis B: What you need to know. Physicians for Informed Consent, August 2022 (updated Oct 2024). https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/hepatitis-b-dis/
11. https://www.fda.gov/media/119403/download
12. Shaw CA, Petrik MS. Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103(11):1555.
13. Exley C, Clarkson E. Aluminium in human brain tissue from donors without neurodegenera­tive disease: a comparison with Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis and autism. Sci Rep. 2020 May 8;10(1):7770.
14. Dachel A. Del Bigtree links childhood vaccines to chronic illness, neurological, autoimmune disease. Anne’s Substack, Feb. 3, 2025.
15. Exley C. Aluminium-based adjuvants should not be used as placebos in clinical trials. Vaccine. 2011;29(50):9289.
16. https://www.fda.gov/media/119403/download
17. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html
18. CDC seasonal flu vaccine effectiveness studies. CDC, Aug. 14, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/flu-vaccines-work/php/effectiveness-studies/index.html
19. Mawson AR, Jacob B. Vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders: a study of nine-year-old children enrolled in Medicaid. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan;v6.2019-2025.
20. Maenner MJ, Warren Z, Williams AR, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Mar 24;72(2):1-14.
21. Meredith R. Autism: highest rate on record of NI children with diagnosis. BBC, May 18, 2023.
22. Ma J. Bill Gates reveals he probably would be diagnosed on the autism spectrum if he were growing up today. Fortune, Jan. 25, 2025.
23. Latypova S. The ABV strategy = anything but vaccines. Due Diligence and Art, Jan. 27, 2025.
24. https://vaxxedthemovie.com/
25. Kennedy RF Jr, Hooker B. Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak. Skyhorse Publishing, 2023.
26. https://www.immunize.org/official-guidance/fda/pkg-inserts/
27. Nelson K. What’s in that jab? Disclosed ingredients may be the tip of the iceberg. Wise Traditions. Spring 2024;25(1):66- 74.
28. Hulscher N, Bowden MT, McCullough PA. Review: Calls for market removal of COVID-19 vaccines intensify as risks far outweigh theoretical benefits. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan;v6.2019-2025.
29. Seligmann H. Anatomy of a complex psyop scam: Deagel depopulation forecast increases with scheduled childhood vaccination doses. ResearchGate, December 2024.
30. Rancourt DG. Opinion: Invalidity of counterfactual models of mortality averted by childhood vaccination. CORRELA­TION Research in the Public Interest, Report, Jan. 29, 2025.
31. Hamer DH. The God Gene: How Faith Is Hardwired into Our Genes. Doubleday, 2004.
32. Spearman T. Vaccines devised to delete the God gene. Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal. 2023;5(1).
33. Phillips C. Experimental mRNA vaccine hints at potential against glioblastoma. National Cancer Institute, Jun. 11, 2024.
34. Zorrilla EP, Iwasaki S, Moss JA, et al. Vaccination against weight gain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 29;103(35):13226-13231.
35. Treatment of avian influenza A viruses in people. CDC Archive, last reviewed Nov. 15, 2018. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/flu/avianflu/treatment.htm
36. Hobley N. USDA gives conditional license for bird flu vac­cine given to chickens. The Vaccine Reaction, Mar. 2, 2025.
37. Vaccines market: growth, size, share, and trends. Markets and Markets, April 2024. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/vaccine-technologies-market-1155.Html

 

Advice For Livestock Producers

As you are no doubt aware, the attack on farm livestock is in full swing across the world. Millions of healthy chickens have already been culled and more slaughter orders are issued each day. Over fifty-five million chickens have been culled in Iowa, Ohio and Indiana alone.

What can a farmer do when the government inspectors arrive to inspect your chickens, beef/ dairy cattle, goats, pigs or anything else that they claim may be carrying the avian flu virus?

The Weston A. Price Foundation (WAPF) has provided a questionnaire that can be given to inspectors at the farm gate—before allowing them entry to your land. You can download the forms here: sookewapf.org/up­loads/9/9/3/0/99306456/inspectorforms.pdf

Page one of the form is for the visiting in­spector or inspectors to provide the names and contact information of those visiting the farm. The second, more detailed, page (Questionnaire for Inspector) asks for proof of successful isola­tion of the bird flu virus, proof of the contagious nature of the bird flu virus, type of test that will be used and contact information of the lab that will be doing the testing. It states that this form must be filled out completely before any sample is released. I suggest you download the Inspector Forms and have them ready at your farm or ranch should you be visited by inspec­tors. Backyard chicken farmers would be well advised to do this as well.

Make provisions to have one or more wit­nesses as you hand the inspectors the forms. Politely, but firmly make it clear that you have a right to the information you are requesting. Ask for their ID (driver’s license and badge), and take photos of these, as well as a photo of each inspector.

Clarify that the inspector(s) can return to their office to obtain the information you’ve requested.

The key is to politely but firmly refuse to provide a sample until the information the provide is satisfactory.

WAPF reports that this strategy has been successful, saying that obviously no inspector will be able to provide the information requested on the form, information that is the farmer’s right to have. The hope is that they will leave and never come back—as they have with astute chicken farmers in the UK.

You can help! If you visit farmer’s markets, or purchase your eggs, poultry, beef and pork directly from your local farmer, please help by printing off the two forms and giving them to farmers participating in the market. We need an army of freedom-loving volunteers to get this message out. Without that, our food supply is in grave danger.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

• Want to know more about contagion? This half-hour podcast “Are Germs the Enemy?” with Dr. Andrew Kaufman is highly rec­ommended and an excellent place to start. westonaprice.org/podcast/242-are-germs-the-enemy/
• Canada’s Christine Massey publishes on her website all of the results of Freedom of Infor­mation requests that have been sent to over two hundred health and science institutions in forty countries around the world. Not one had any record of SARS-CoV-2 isolation or purification, nor for any other alleged virus on which they have been challenged. Find Christine’s website here: fluoridefreepeel.ca/ fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE!

sookewapf.org/blog/attention-livestock-pro­ducers.

This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2025

🖨️ Print post