Sally Fallon Morell takes on the Diet Dictocrats
BRIBERY
During the Covid fiasco, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield provided âincentivesâ to doctors to give patients the Covid shots. According to an Anthem document to physicians, âGetting vaccinated against COVID-19 is one of the best and safest ways people can protect themselves and their families against the virus. As a participating practice in the COÂVID-19 Provide Vaccine Incentive program, we recognize your hard work by offering incentives for helping patients make the choice to become vaccinated.â These âincentivesâ were paid to the whole practice, not individual doctors. If by September 1, 2021, 30 percent of patients were vacciÂnated, all physicians received a bonus of twenty dollars per member. The bonus per vaccination went up to one hundred twenty-five dollars if 75 percent were vaccinated. Then for all newly vaccinated between Sept. 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021, the bonus went up to two hundred fifty dollars per patient if 75 percent of patients in the whole practice were vaccinated. Willing to forego your bonus payment because you donât want to vaccinate your patients? The problem is that the bonus payments were based on the vaccination rate of the whole practice, so the peer pressure on you would have been enormous. Representative Thomas Massie was right when he said, âYour primary care provider was bribed to get you to take the jabâ (notthebee.com, January 20, 2024).
ZERO EFFECTIVENESS
A team of four applied mathematicians on the faculty of Palacky University Olomouc in the Czech Republic has published a paper arguing zero effectiveness of the Covid shots. Published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, May 2024, the article is entitled: âDoes the healthy vaccinee bias rule them all? Association of COVID-19 vacÂcination status and all-cause mortality from an analysis of data from 2.2 million individual health records.â Noting that vaccination bias led to the overestimation of Covid vaccine efficiency in observational studies, the authors concluded, âA careful examination of data appears to indicate that the COVID-19 vaccines failed completely in the primary task of helping people avoid death.â The authors note that data on vaccination often suffer from the cheap trick of mis-categorizationâthe main one being to categorize people in the first fourteen days after vaccine delivery as âuntreated.â
HIGH IMMUNITY?
Two teams of researchers injected volunteers with various doses of various Covid viral âvariantsâ with a view to makÂing them sick, but not one of the participants succumbed. A study funded by the Wellcome Trust âfailed to induce sustained infectionsâ in any of the thirty-six volunteers, even at very high doses of the âvirusâ (Lancet Microbe 2024 Apr 26:S2666-5247(24)00025-9). In an earlier trial, conducted in the UK, none of the volunteers injected with the âvirusâ showed adverse effects, although the âvirusâ was subsequently found in about half the participants (Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1031-1041). The perplexed researchers cited âhigh immunityâ in the volunteers to explain these results, rather than come out and admit that the so-called virus is a nothing-burger that doesnât make people sick at all. . . and for which health professionals administered toxic injections to over half the worldâs population, imposed lockdowns, closed schools and mandated breathing barriers in the form of face masks.
PLASTIC IN THE LUNGS
Wearing face diapers during the Covid-19 âpandemicâ would save lives, health officials assured us. Except that they didnât. A study published in the journal Medicine analyzed data from counties in Kansas, comparing the death rate in counties that imposed a mask mandate with counties that allowed their citizens to breathe freely. After accounting for confounding factors, the study author, Dr. Zacharias Fogen, found that the mortality rate was 52 percent higher in counties that manÂdated masking. One explanationâaside from the fact that masks block oxygenâis inhalation of microplastics from the masks. A team of scientists from Hull York Medical School found that the microfibers tended to lodge in the lower part of the lung; the most abundant types were polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), the most common types of fiber found in surgical masks. One study found that re-using the masks (which most people do) increased the risk of inhaling microplastic particles. Microplastics also turn up in the blood and, in babies, at very high levels in meconium, babyâs first stool. The amount of PET in infant stool is ten times higher than found in adult samples. This suggests that the fetus is absorbing microplastics from the mother, and if the mother wears a mask during pregnancy, then her offspring will start life overloaded with microplasÂtics (Mercola.com, May 25, 2024).
FEAR MONGERING
âNew Evidence Supports Fear That Drinking Raw Milk Containing Bird Flu Viruses May Be Dangerous. . . mice that were fed milk from H5N1-infected cows became very ill. . . . After mice drink raw H5N1 milk, bird flu virus riddles their organs,â writes journalist Helen Branswell (STAT, May 24, 2024). In another Internet article, Beth Mole declares (Ars Technica, May 24, 2024): âDespite the delusions of the raw milk crowd, drinking unpasteurized milk brimming with infectious avian H5N1 influenza virus is a very bad idea, according to freshly squeezed data published Friday in the New England Journal of Medicine. . . H5N1 bird flu virus [was found] in their respiratory tracts, as well [as] their hearts, kidneys, spleens, livers, mammary glands, and brains.â Letâs make a few things clear. The researchers never âfoundâ any virus through properly carried out isolation in the milk or other secretions of cows; they only âdetectedâ various strands of genetic material, assumed to be âclades [ancestors]â or âresortments [mutations]â of the âvirusâ through worthless PCR testing. The âvery illâ mice suffered from lethargy and ruffled fur. According to the Branswell article, the mice were euthanized on day four of the study âbecause we did not want to see mice die before [tissue] sampling. . . [and because] studies that involve exposing animals to potentially lethal pathogens do not allow them to experience lingering deaths.â Oh really? Lingering deaths from ruffled fur? Or maybe the researchers euthanized them to prevent them from recoverÂing. Then they used the same bogus testing methods to find the pesky virus in all their organs. Based on this worthless research, officials have concluded that âmammary tissues of dairy cattle appear to be highly susceptible to the virus, with infected lactating cows shedding extraordinarily high levels of virus in their milk.â Fortunately, raw milk drinkers are not listening. Since March 25, when health officials began their fear-mongering about bird flu in dairy cows, sales of raw milk have increased 21 percent to as much as 65 percent compared with the same periods a year ago (AP, May 14, 2024).
GRAVY VINDICATED
Collagen is the glue that holds us together, comprising about one-third of all the protein in the body, and forming a major component of hair, bones, skin, digestive tract, joints and tendons. The amino acid glycine makes up about 28 percent of collagen, and glycine plays many additional roles in the body. Accumulating research indicates a myriad of benefits from glycine: extending life span, reversing the effects of aging, suppressing tumor growth, enhancing bone mineral density, improving blood sugar levels, improving sleep, reducing stress, supporting gut health, accelerating wound healing, supporting neurological function andâbest of allâreducing wrinkles (mercola.com, October 2, 2023). As a result of all this research, weâre seeing well-muscled body builders touting the benefits of glycine supplements. Much better to follow the advice of jolly chefs and make gelatinous bone broth as a weekly routine. Then use it liberally in soups, sauces and gravies.
BORON BLESSING
Each age has its toxins. During the nineteenth century, the main toxin was arsenic (used in medicines, wallpaper, cosmetics and metal alloys); in the twentieth century it was mercury (used in medicines, amalgam fillings and vacÂcines). Today the primary toxin has to be aluminum, used in vaccinations, packaging and occurring at very high levÂels in infant formula, particularly in prescription formulas designed for infants with allergies and intolerance. The list of aluminumâs toxic effects is a long one: desquamative interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, granulomas, granulomatosis and fibrosis, toxic myocarditis, thrombosis and ischemic stroke, granulomatous enteritis, Crohnâs disease, inflammatory bowel diseases, anemia, AlÂzheimerâs disease, dementia, sclerosis, autism, macrophagic myofasciitis, osteomalacia, oligospermia and infertility, hepatorenal disease, breast cancer and cyst, pancreatitis, pancreatic necrosis and diabetes mellitus. One good antidote to aluminum toxicity is boron (Toxics. 2022 Aug; 10(8): 428), which helps remove aluminum from the body and protects against aluminum-induced damage. Moreover, the remedy costs pennies. Simply dissolve one teaspoon borax powder in a quart of water, and take one teaspoon of the borax solution every day.
OK TO SALT
And be sure to flavor your gravy with salt! While the Internet is rife with warnings about the dangers of salt, a 2021 study published in Nutrients (2021 Jan 19;13(1):269) finds that such advice should be taken. . . with a grain of salt. âHigher Intakes of Potassium and Magnesium, but Not Lower Sodium, Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in the Framingham Offspring Studyâ looked at the dose-response relations of sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium intake with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. What they found was that higher intakes of potassium, magnesium and also calcium were associated with lower cardiovascular risk (the calcium association was non-statistically significant), but lower soÂdium intake was not associated with a lower risk of CVD. Those who consumed 3500 mg sodium (about 9 grams salt) per day were no more at risk for cardiovascular disease than those who consumed the recommended 2500 mg sodium (about 6 grams salt) per day. Another recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (2021 Jun;174(6):764- 772) used the Veterans Health Administration databases. Researchers found that the lowest cardiovascular risk was associated with an estimated sodium intake of 3500 mg per day, which is close to the average salt consumption in the U.S.âjust under two teaspoons. In fact, the study results sugÂgest that aggressive salt reduction is potentially hazardous.
BEWARE THE FALSE POSITIVE
Women are supposed to have a mammogram every two years starting at age forty until the age of seventy-four, on the premÂise that early detection is the best way to reduce the number of deaths from breast cancer. However, false positives from mammograms are common (estimated at 11 percent of all screenings), and new research published in JAMA Oncology (2024 Jan 1;10(1):63-70) has found that women with a false-positive result had an 84 percent higher rate of breast cancer death than those without. What this means is that the diagÂnosis of breast cancer, plus the treatmentâbiopsy, surgery, chemotherapy and radiationâis worse than the disease itself.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH FAKE MEAT?
A new documentary, Beyond ImpossibleâThe Truth Behind the Fake Meat Industry, by Gravitas Documentaries reveals that just about everything is wrong with them. They have the wrong amino acids, for one thing, which do not meet our protein requirements for muscle maintenance; some of these proteinsâup to forty-fiveâare ânovelâ meaning we have no idea of their effects on the body. Fake meats are high in polyunsaturated, omega-6 fatty acids, not the saturated fats the body is expecting when we eat meat. There’s no collagen in fake meat. Collagen accounts for about 30 percent of the total protein in your body and ordinarily accompanies muscle protein when you eat meatâespecially as a long-simmered stew. Then there’s a slew of flavorings, one of which will be MSG, and of course a list of synthetic vitamins, which are uniformly hard to absorb and unlikely to provide any nourÂishment. Fake meat is an ultraprocessed food, and according to a 2024 systematic review (BMJ 2024;384:e077310), the higher your intake of processed food, the higher your risk of adverse effects.
SPEEDING UP THE PROCESS
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a major polymer found in most consumer packaging, does break down thanks to an enzyme called PETase that allows bacteria to degrade PET plasticsâbut very, very slowly. Engineers and scientists at the University of Texas at Austin have created a variant of PETase that can degrade these polymers in a matter of hours to days. Calling the new enzyme âFAST-PETase,â for âFunctional, Active, Stable and Tolerant,â the new enzyme variant has the advantage of working at less than 50 degrees C, making it portable, affordable and energy-efficient. AlterÂnative industrial processes for degrading plastics are highly energy-intensive (Nature, 2022).
đ¨ď¸ Print post
Leave a Reply