HILDA LABRADA GORE: The Pfizer documents on the testing of the Covid-19 vaccine were released by court order in March 2022. A detailed analysis of the documents reveals that not only was Pfizer’s Covid-19 injection far from safe and effective, but it was intentionally designed to harm the world’s populace and impede human reproduction. Naomi Wolf, journalist, activist, CEO of the DailyClout and author of books such as The Beauty Myth and The Bodies of Others, walks us through the many shocking revelations of the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Reports, now available in book form.1 Over thirty-five hundred doctors and scientists participated in the project of analyzing the documents.
Naomi, the Pfizer documents were released in March 2022 to “crickets,” that is, with little to no interest from the public or the media. Why were these papers overlooked by most people? What was in them that is important for us to know?
NAOMI WOLF: These documents were released subsequent to a successful lawsuit by Aaron Siri and his firm, Siri & Glimstad. They were demanding that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is the custodian of the Pfizer documents, release them all—and the judge agreed. This is fortunate because those documents are historic. They represent their record of the greatest crime in human history.
It was “crickets” when they were first released because the documents are difficult to understand—and they are voluminous. They are written in scientific language, which you need to be a specialist to interpret. There were tens of thousands of documents. I knew that we were looking at a journalistic black hole because lay journalists couldn’t understand what was in the documents, and they were going to come and go. We put out a call on Steve Bannon’s War Room, which is one of the examples of the many surprising alliances that have been created in these crazy times. To his credit, Bannon supported us in asking for a crowdsourced interpretation of these documents. We initially got twenty-five hundred experts (now numbering thirty-five hundred)—biostatisticians, physicians, RNs, medical fraud investigators, pathologists, cardiologists, research scientists and biologists—to review the documents and to create what are now sixty-two reports, explaining to people in lay language what the documents show. The bottom line is that they show the greatest crime against humanity ever.
HG: That is a powerful statement. Let’s dive into it because people are eager to know. I’m grateful that you found this group of volunteer experts from around the world who have analyzed these papers extensively and can give us some answers. First of all, what evidence points to the fact that Pfizer knew during the clinical trials that the Covid-19 mRNA shot was harmful on a large scale or would be harmful on a large scale?
NW: That is a great question, and it matters legally, because it is one thing if they were greedy and clueless and the science changed, but it is a whole other level of criminality if they saw the harm and kept going or even intended the harm. Don’t take my word for it. The Pfizer documents reports are now in a book; you can order it and see for yourself. There is no way that anyone looking at these documents can conclude that Pfizer did not intend to murder, sterilize and maim people on a massive scale.
Let me give you a couple of examples. A month after the mass rollout in December 2020, Pfizer’s own internal data showed that the vaccines did not treat Covid and were useless. The language that Pfizer uses is “vaccine failure” and “failure of efficacy.” The documents showed that the third most likely bad thing that could happen to someone after getting injected— again, they knew this a month after rollout—is that they would get Covid! From the beginning, these vaccines never worked as promised; they did not do what they were claimed to do. However, that did not cause this company to stop—they kept going.
Here is a second example. They knew, four months later, that the vaccines were causing heart damage in minors. They knew that thirty-five minors had sustained heart damage within a week of having been injected. They knew that, and nonetheless they pushed at that time for a medical Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to inject minors. You have to understand what I’m saying. Their internal documents showed that thirty-five minors had been injured with heart damage, yet that was the time when they kept pushing for EUA—and they got it for minors. Four months later, after a giant summer-long campaign to inject minors, there was a press release from the government saying, “There may be an elevated risk of myocarditis.” They knew, but again, they kept going.
HG: We know the big pharmaceutical companies have a financial incentive to keep pushing their products and make billions of dollars. But why would the media not make more of a stink about this once the Pfizer papers were released?
NW: In my 2022 book, The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and the War Against the Human,2 I follow the money trail. Pfizer, with its ally, China, and their allies—the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—bought up our media. This took place through millions of dollars from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund “health coverage” or “Covid coverage.” The Guardian, the BBC, NPR and all the legacy media we have learned to trust are invested in the vaccines; they took the money and, therefore, couldn’t or wouldn’t run anything critical about any side effects, problems or questions because the money would dry up. They also participated in smearing people like me, Dr. Mercola and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who tried to raise normal journalistic questions.
The other reason is our own taxpayer money. In the 2021 Coronavirus Response and Consolidated Appropriations Act, one billion dollars went to overcoming vaccine hesitancy through a program to pay off trusted messengers. This was demonically brilliant. They bought up every trusted influencer in our society, including churches, synagogues, pop culture icons on Instagram, food writers, Broadway shows, tiny little dance troops in Koreatown and Columbia County tourism. I remember thinking this was weird when my synagogue sent me a “Jewish Life in the Hudson Valley” magazine with two little masked five-year-old girls on the cover. Organically, this would never happen. I began to see all of these local organizations saying, “You can’t come in without a vaccine. You have to show a vaccine passport.” Organically, that would never happen. They all took the money, and the money flowed like crazy up and down the food chain. It is heartbreaking.
I remember an influencer. I have known her since she was a young woman, and I knew her son. Her son was fifteen during the summer of 2021. She said, “I’m so excited. I took my son to get injected.” All I did was tweet to her, “You know that the clinical trials will not be complete until 2023.” She accused me of harassing her child and called me names. These are the “influencers.” I’m not trying to single her out but am pointing out that it was down to that level of money flows—paying people to call other people names on Twitter. That is what happened.
It wasn’t just rewards; it was also punishments. I did what I had done for thirty-five years. I called attention in June of 2021 to the fact that women were having menstrual symptoms, as eyewitness reports were communicated on Twitter. I’m a big believer that when women volunteer information—and it confirms other information that women also volunteer—that is a signal you should pay attention to. Women were reporting weird, bad things happening to their menstrual cycles. You don’t have to be a weirdo hippie to know that a healthy menstrual cycle is a prime sign of a healthy woman. If your menstrual cycle is impaired, something is probably wrong. I reported on this neutrally, and I got deplatformed—but not just deplatformed—it was a global attack on my reputation on news site after news site around the world in the same language, telling the same lies and distortions. This is what they are able to do now.
As we now know through other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, those reputational attacks were the result of our White House colluding with our Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Census Bureau and all these agencies in our federal government to single out “that tweet by Naomi Wolf,” which was an accurate tweet. It is in our White House documents. There was a whole network of people unconstitutionally and unlawfully collaborating to say, “Get rid of this. Take care of this.” It was like a law enforcement “Be on the Lookout” (BOLO) advisory—like I was a criminal fugitive.
HG: Even if many people were part of a campaign of collusion to persuade the public to get this vaccine, I believe there must have been some goodhearted people in the mix. Tell me if you think this is true. Weren’t there some people who simply thought, “This is best for humanity and public health”?
NW: Not at Pfizer and FDA! I haven’t even begun to tell you what’s in these documents, but there is a three-hundred-sixty-degree attack on human reproduction. There is a section where over 80 percent of the women who were pregnant sustained spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. There is a section where Pfizer defines “exposure to the vaccine” as inhalation, skin contact or sexual intercourse, especially at conception. In other words, a vaccinated male to an unvaccinated female is exposing her through his semen, presumably to the vaccine. They knew something bad was being transmitted through vaccinated men’s semen—through bodily fluids.
There is a section with a chart listing, in scientific language, twenty horrible things that can happen to women’s menstrual cycles. There are tens of thousands of numbers in each category—like fifty thousand women are bleeding every single day for the rest of their lives; twenty-five thousand women have lost their menstrual cycles completely; seventeen thousand women have two periods a month. They are neutrally checking off the list of all these ruined and infertile women—and they keep going.
There is a section where they note biodistribution. They know, and they have checked. It is in their study; contrary to their messaging that “the vaccine stays in the injection site,” they knew that within forty-eight hours, it biodistributes to every organ in the body, accumulating in the lymph, the adrenals, the liver, the brain and, if you are a woman, in the ovaries. Dr. Chandler found that every time you get injected, you get more lipid nanoparticles—these industrial fats coated with polyethylene glycol (a petroleum byproduct)—in your ovaries, and there is no visible mechanism by which the body can get rid of it. You are going to have horrific fertility problems. The lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta, so you are going to have the baby die-off that I alerted the world to some months ago. That is now being confirmed by people like Igor Chudov and Ed Dowd, the “million missing babies in Europe.”3 We know the mechanism.
Respectfully, I would like to believe that this was bumbling idiots or people who didn’t know the outcome, but there is no way to look at these experiments and these tables, and conclude that. Because it is not just that they witnessed their injection causing death, stroke, neurological symptoms and infertility at an industrial scale, it is that they designed the experiments to ensure that they would. There is no simple way to say it.
HG: It sounds like money is not necessarily the bottom line for these companies and entities like the World Economic Forum and the WHO. It sounds like there may indeed be an agenda to depopulate or lower the world’s population growth.
NW: I have to conclude that. I did some germane original reporting to answer that question; I found that China is central to the supply chain here and owns the intellectual property of these injections. Through a company called Fosun Pharmaceuticals, which is owned by the Chinese Communist Party, there is a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with BioNTech, the subsidiary of Pfizer that makes these injections. They are working with China to produce them. China produced one billion injections with this MOU through Fosun Pharma, but they didn’t give them to their own population. They sent them to Western Europe and the United States. They opened fourteen manufacturing plants in Western Europe and two in the United States—one in Springfield, Massachusetts, and one in Princeton, New Jersey. In 2021, I found a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing—our own SEC—that showed a 100 percent completed tech transfer from BioNTech for this injection “to China.” Not to a Chinese person or a Chinese company—it says, “To China.” So, when you get a Pfizer injection after 2021, you are getting an injection manufactured and distributed by—and with the knowledge, ownership and decision-making about what is in the contents in the hands of—our existential adversary, the Chinese Communist Party. As my husband, who spent twelve years in military intelligence and is part of the intelligence community to some extent, with a long career in that world, pointed out to me early on, China wants our land. They want our natural resources and energy. They don’t want our population.
That is the outcome in these tables, in these documents. There were forty-two thousand adverse events in the three months after the rollout. Thirty-six thousand of the adverse events were in the United States. The next largest tranche was in Western Europe in order of political importance—Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece—but all the adverse events combined of the other fifty-one countries add up to a tiny sliver. This is a disproportionately affecting bioweapon made by China.
HG: It makes me wonder whether placebos (or vaccines or injections of lesser potency) were given to some of the other countries because it seems like all around the world, there was a push to get vaccinated so we could all get back to normal life. Do you think that was the case?
NW: You’re asking such an important question. Absolutely; but we found that you could kill and maim people by adjusting the dose. For instance, Pfizer’s micrograms of the active ingredients are thirty for adults, but Moderna’s is one hundred micrograms. Moderna is three times more lethal than Pfizer, according to Pfizer’s own metrics. Even in the internal documents, Pfizer discontinued using one hundred micrograms as an experimental dose due to its being reactogenic, but they didn’t tell the public, “If you have had the Moderna dose, stop, because it is already too much.” My mom has heart damage. She had two Moderna shots and a booster. They didn’t tell her, but they knew. That is why when you say, “Is this an accident?” I’m like, “No, it is no accident. They knew one hundred micrograms was too much.”
Think about children now. The dose for a child is ten micrograms if the child is twelve to seventeen, but children who are twelve to seventeen vary hugely in size depending on whether they are a boy or a girl. You are going to give the same dose to a two-hundred-pound, seventeen-year-old quarterback male as you are to a tiny anorexic twelve-year-old female who is half his size. She could die! Small boys who are twelve could die. And you are seeing this. Think about the boys who have passed away in their sleep. They are small. They are not the big kids. Think about those news stories you have seen, “died suddenly.” Who knows why?
Then think about the next younger group, five through eleven years old. The dose is three micrograms. You are giving the same amount to a big eleven-year-old as you are to a tiny six-year-old. You can kill people or maim them just by not titrating the dose to their size or by giving them a different brand. If you want to take someone out, give them Moderna rather than Pfizer. It is that simple. That is why the vaccine passport thing is dangerous because if you want to take out all the mayors in blue states, or highly trained Special Forces guys, give them Moderna.
But you can also take people out through temperature and storage. This is our original reporting, and I have to say, my original reporting.4 Remember, early on, when the very ultra-cold temperatures that this material had to be stored in were highlighted in news reports? There is a reason for that. These lipid nanoparticles coalesce at room temperature. They solidify when it gets warmer. What are human beings? They are warmer than room temperature. You inject something that is liquid because it is super cold, and then it warms up in the body and clumps or coalesces in the blood. That is zipping through the heart. There is this physiological mechanism to cause damage. We are seeing so much damage to the vasculature—thrombocytopenia, blood clots, leg clots, lung clots—this material is designed this way. They knew it for ten years. It traverses every membrane in the human body. It clots; it basically “lumps” in the body. The last thing I will say about temperature is that the guidelines for storing it have changed constantly. First, it was, “Don’t leave it out for more than two hours.” Then it was, “Don’t leave it out for more than twelve hours.”
HG: Why have they changed the amount of time that it should be cooled or allowed to be at room temperature? It is because of the characteristics, the clumping that happens more at room temperature.
NW: Think about it. It is the perfect crime. If you keep something liquid out for two hours, it is still liquid. If you leave it out longer, it is more damaging when it goes into the body.
I’m hypothesizing a little bit, because those studies have not been done. I know that it is an unstable product whose properties change with temperature. You can’t reliquefy it. Once it has been warmed, it doesn’t turn into solid again, even if you chill it. If you leave it out and it warms up, it causes a breakdown in its integrity to start out with. My expectation is that it is going to be more damaging. Leaving that aside, the change in temperature when it goes from liquid, super cold outside or in the refrigerator—the special refrigerator—into the body, which is warm, is inevitably going to cause damage, and they knew that. It’s genius.
HG: If Pfizer, the CDC, some of these other organizations that are ostensibly overseeing world health and the media are all colluding together to keep this stuff on the market, is this one reason the CDC has recommended that Covid-19 injections be added to the childhood schedule?
NW: Yes, because if you add anything to the childhood schedule, it is protected from liability. You can’t sue them in the same way. There are more legal protections.
HG: Even if people don’t comb through the Pfizer documents themselves and maybe don’t even read the book, I think they are still starting to notice this association between the injections, clotting, heart issues, and menstrual cycle disruptions, aren’t they? What is your take on it?
NW: It is hard for me to know what is happening in the general culture because I’m still quite ostracized and excluded from the general culture. I talk to people who are already worried. I talk to people I never spoke to before I was deplatformed and smeared. Most of my audience now is alternative media, conservative media, evangelicals—the people who already had questions. I wrote a piece about this. When I am back in New York City, where I used to live, when I dip a toe into my former haunts of liberal media, liberal elite circles and liberal social circles, I find that people don’t want to talk about it. There is a lot of denial. It’s not that I’m even trying to talk about it, but I went into a bookstore, and there is not a single book—none of the respected commentators who ordinarily write about race, gender, economic justice or even medicine or science are touching the events of the last several years, let alone the lethality of this injection. I see a lot of denial.
I also see a lot of backpedaling. On the front page of the New York Times—two and a half years late!—there was a story about how young women are sustaining heart damage from the AstraZeneca vaccine. Two years ago, the New York Times reporter blocked me when she kept saying, “It is safe and effective for pregnant women.” I kept saying, “Where are those datasets? Where are they? Show them to me. I don’t see them.” She blocked me.
I see a lot of people trying to get ahead of lawsuits by saying, “Yes, maybe it is kind of unsafe.” That is not the same as doing real reporting. Who poisoned America? Who put our children at risk? Why did they do that? If they do that reporting, it comes back squarely to point at them. They took the money. They encouraged that crime, and they are probably criminally culpable as an accessory to mass murder. I can’t stress this enough.
HG: You have become allies with people who before might have seen you as persona non grata. Now you have joined this other camp, but you are a person who is seeking truth and speaking truth as you see it. It doesn’t mean you are discarding your former work. You saw what was happening, and you spoke about it. Suddenly, you are allied with people who think a little alternatively.
NW: I hear what you are saying, but I would gently push back against the framing of it. What is heartbreaking about this time is that I’m doing exactly what I have done for thirty-five years. I haven’t changed, but the culture and the politics around me have changed. When I wrote a book about eating disorders among young women on the rise, I was a hero. When I wrote a book about women being railroaded by industrial obstetrics and having bad birth experiences, I was a hero. When I wrote a book about female sexuality being negatively affected by the hormones in birth control pills, I was a hero. Silicone breast implants, I’m a hero. Now that I have done the same type of reporting, saying “here is Big Pharma messing with women’s bodies again,” I call attention to it, and I’m persona non grata. I haven’t changed! I don’t feel like I am aligning with new people. I feel like there has been a massive cultural corruption of the landscape involving the money flow that I described. To some extent, it is also ideological. It is like, “Our guy Biden is in the White House”—this is my liberal friends I’m referring to—“Because we are good, he must be good; if he must be good, he can’t be doing anything bad.” It is that kind of reductive tribalism.
I do feel like I have always been happy to speak with everybody. Even when I was a darling of the left (until several years ago), I have never understood people’s reluctance to talk to people who disagreed with them. To me, it is exciting and important to talk to people with whom you disagree because you can learn something, or they can learn something. That is how our country is supposed to work. Before, conservatives and alt media couldn’t talk to me, but I have always been happy to talk to them.
HG: That is what I was trying to get at. You are still doing your best to wake people up to things that are dishonoring to people, especially women. People are rejecting that new you, but it is the same you! Speaking of having conversations that are difficult with folks who think differently, with all the knowledge you have, what do you say to someone who is still persuaded by the mainstream narrative and thinks the shots are helpful? What is one fact that you point out to get their attention?
NW: That is tough because I don’t try anymore to lobby people who don’t affirmatively want to come get the information. It is a heartbreaking experience. A cult mentality has set in, in the worlds of people who watch CNN and listen to NPR. These people include my loved ones. These are people who are well-educated, critical thinkers, editors, psychoanalysts and journalists. I will try to bring them a primary source piece of evidence, and they won’t even look at it. Many other people also have had this experience. That is depressing. There is no point—no matter what you show them, they will say, “That is not an authoritative source,” or they will go through the “script,” saying “You are not a doctor.” “No, I’m not a doctor, but I oversee thirty-five hundred doctors and scientists, and this is what they are saying.” If it is not the CDC, it doesn’t seem to matter, which is surreal because now the CDC has turned out to be completely corrupt. Their numbers are completely compromised.
That is why I feel good about this Pfizer documents material being in a book format because it takes an aggregate approach. I have a lot of loved ones who are doctors and scientists in my family. Up until 2022, they would get on family Zoom calls and read me the “overcoming vaccine hesitancy” script. I would have specific conversations with them, asking, “Do you know where the spike protein goes in the body?” I will never forget this response from my relative—I love this person, God bless him—but I heard this a lot from different doctors: “It gets digested and excreted.” I would say, “How do you know that? What evidence do you have of that?” They were assuming this. We know it does not get digested and excreted. It goes into every organ in your body and stays there. I remember these demoralizing conversations in which people I loved, who were smart people with the best credentials, were reading a “script” from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It may have been a script from the NIH, but they weren’t aware that it was a script from the NIH. All the way down—from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) to the American Medical Association (AMA) to all of the licensing boards and probably every website on which they applied to get funding for their research—this script was being presented. I am not blaming them—well, I am blaming them a little; they are scientists and doctors. They should have looked a tiny bit deeper. When has it been considered an American or post-Enlightenment value to just believe what the authorities say? Everybody knows that is a stupid idea rather than verifying it for yourself! I don’t understand what happened to this country. We all understood that principle until 2020.
HG: What keeps you hopeful? Is all hope lost? Everybody with these spike proteins all over their internal organs, and even people who haven’t gotten the shot concerned about shedding are asking, “Are we all going to be messed up?” What do you see as a hopeful point?
NW: The fertility question is a huge one. We have seen just the tip of the iceberg there. Clearly, affecting reproduction was their intent. Dr. James Thorpe, a fetal-maternal medicine specialist, has pointed out, together with Amy Kelly, our project director, who broke the story, that the lipid nanoparticles degrade the testes of baby boys in utero and degrade the Sertoli cells and Leydig cells, which are the factory of masculine hormones. We don’t know if these little boys will grow up to be fertile, but we don’t know if they will grow up to be men. These are little babies that weren’t even vaccinated. Their moms were vaccinated.
Babies are also ingesting lipid nanoparticles and polyethylene glycol in the breast milk of vaccinated moms. We don’t know what that is going to do to them. We know that one baby described in the Pfizer documents died of seizures after having drunk milk from a vaccinated mom. The Weston A. Price Foundation is about natural health, so you know how significant it is that breastfeeding in the pandemic fell from 34 percent of women, which is low already, to 14 percent of women. Eighty-six percent of babies are not having that primal experience of nurture from the mom’s body of this perfect food. As a former nursing mom, I can tell you that 20 percent of women don’t stop breastfeeding out of nowhere! They probably stopped because many of them are vaccinated, and their babies are having trouble with their breast milk. Understandably: it’s got a petroleum byproduct in it. We don’t know what gastrointestinal problems, allergies or physical outcomes there will be from that. To stick to fertility, we don’t know whether the lipid nanoparticles are lodging in the eggs of baby girls in utero and penetrating the baby.
We don’t know. This generation is dying disproportionately; Ed Dowd has confirmed widespread disability, horrible menstrual problems and heart damage. It is the next generation about which we don’t know whether they will be able to reproduce. God forbid, but from what I see, it may be that we won’t know what has happened to humanity until we see whether the offspring of both vaccinated and unvaccinated parents can have children. It may be that only children of two unvaccinated parents who mate with children of two unvaccinated parents will be able to have children. That is a small percentage of the human population at this point.
HG: We try to offer information, like you are doing, to alert people to the gravity of the situation, so they will become wise, make some shifts in their diet and lifestyle and be fully aware of what they are taking into their body, whether through a shot or in their mouth. It all matters.
NW: I should pivot and respond to the more hopeful question you asked. You said, “How can people hope?” I sketched out the worst-case scenario. I’m moving on to how people hope. I see some beautiful things happening. I see that people are becoming skeptical of conventional medicine, seeking out herbal remedies and alternative remedies, and creating new institutions. For example, our podcast sponsor is called The Wellness Company.5 They have started a new form of uncorrupted telemedicine—at least not corrupted by pharma pressure, health insurance and big hospital industry pressure. They are advising people and trying to help them get off the prescription medications they think they don’t need. That is positive. I don’t know whether that is going to be the solution, but I know that having more options to hear things from doctors that are unmediated by commercial pressures is positive.
I know that people have started unvaccinated blood banks. One is called Blessed By His Blood.6 I’m sure the next thing will be unvaccinated sperm and embryo banks. Surrogacy is going to be on the rise. That is not hopeful. I’m being a futurist. I have loved ones who are vaccinated, and I pray for them nonstop—and for myself. These evil-doers designed these things to transmit by hugging and kissing. We don’t know what shedding does. My husband and I both feel sick when we are around lots of vaccinated people—and we are not alone. They are designed to shed and transmit whatever this is through breathing, sweat and human contact.
The hopeful thing is there are treatments like Dr. McCullough’s and Dr. Alexander’s, though they are not cures. I’m advising people to take nattokinase. There is some suggestion that chelation-type treatments and sauna-type treatments are helpful, cleaning the lymphatic system. I sent my mom some diatomaceous earth. It cleans out your digestive tract. Of course, these are all gestural compared to the huge insult to human beings that these injections represent, but the more we understand about the injections—which is why the Pfizer documents book is important—the more real scientists and doctors can construct treatments that are effective.
Here is another victory. Four hundred and fifty million doses were trashed in Europe because no one wanted them. The WHO announced there is no point in children and teenagers taking the injections. Slowly—but also fast compared to the aggressive rollout—people at least are not taking more and not adding that to their systems.
Existentially, I have concluded this whole thing is a giant battle of good and evil. I can’t understand it by sticking to a materialist analysis. As a firm believer in empirical processes, I have concluded that there is something spiritual going on. We have to choose between good and evil. This is the time in history when we have to do it—this situation forces us to.
The blessing, if there is one, is that a lot of people are turning to a higher power and spiritual practices, community, going back to church and synagogue. I believe what was unleashed upon us is so evil that it can’t be described just in human terms. If enough of us have what we call in my Jewish tradition teshuvah—a return to righteousness or faith, or getting it together as human beings ethically—maybe God will heal us. He said he would. He said, “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land” (2 Chronicles 7:14). I’m banking on that, but that is the best I can do.
HG: When the worst of humanity comes out, the best of humanity comes out. I have seen the same resurgence among experts I have interviewed, friends and people looking for something—that solid ground on which their feet can stand. When they connect with something spiritual, it also makes them more human. There is a push not only to eliminate humanity but also to contaminate humanity and dehumanize us. One thing that bothered me the whole Covid time was everybody covering their faces. I thought, “That makes us look like robots.” Something in my spirit told me this wasn’t right.
NW: The intention was to deindividuate us so that anything could be done to us. I have gone back to the Old Testament, and I found out that the 1560 Geneva Bible is one of the most original translations and most accurate to Hebrew. I read Hebrew. I have been going back and looking at Genesis. In the original Hebrew, it is much stronger than being made in the image and likeness of God. It is something like, “I will make them to resemble me.” It is like a family resemblance. It is much more intimate than “I’m putting my stamp on this clay,” which is the way it has been translated in subsequent centuries. I don’t know where I’m going with that, but I know that when people want to dehumanize people, they shave their heads, they cover their faces, they strip them naked, they turn them into units. They tattoo them.
People are even rethinking abortion. I’m pro-choice, whatever that means, but we—and me personally—have to rethink a society in which we throw away babies. We throw them away like they are nothing. We clean them out like nothing. As a feminist, I’m not saying, “Tell a woman what she can or can’t do with her body,” but maybe we can completely redesign society so that every single baby that is conceived is wanted, has a home, has someone to care for it—and every woman has somewhere safe to give birth and doesn’t have to interrupt her studies. We accepted an anti-human reality even before all this happened to us.
God went, “Do you want to do it yourself? Do it yourself. Do you want to see how bad humans can be to each other? Good luck.” Going back to the Old Testament, there have been times this has happened before. That is what is incredible. It feels to us like nothing this bad has ever happened. It does feel that way. In our lifetimes, nothing this bad has ever happened. I’m the granddaughter of someone who lost nine brothers and sisters in the Holocaust. I don’t say that lightly. I have been rereading the book of Noah. God is like, “These people are wicked from morning until night. It is not working out. I’m going to have to destroy creation.” But even when he was preparing to destroy creation, he was like, “Noah, you are a good guy. Take your wife, sons, daughters-in-law, daughters, sons-in-law, and two of each animal. Here is the ark. Build it like this. You will have three rooms. Cover it with pitch.” It is so nurturing and paternal—it is so moving—because even while He was trying to bring Himself to wipe out all the creation that went astray, He was still hoping that He could save this guy and his family, and they could start over and repopulate. He was saving two of each. He couldn’t bring himself to give up on us.
I’m not trying to be pointlessly optimistic, but I do feel like this is a moment in which we are called deeply to make a moral choice and live in a moral universe because that is the universe I believe God created for us. This situation forces us to think, “What is important to me?” Deciding, “Having babies, being a family, being healthy, being independent from slavery and knowing where my food comes from is important to me.” Maybe fancy things are not important. Being able to have a glass of milk that is uncontaminated is important. It is a complete reversal of all the corruption that was already around us in our society.
I have started an institute for this. It is called Liberty House. We are bringing thought leaders, people and students together to imagine how we rebuild America. Maybe what will come out of this is a new revolution in which medicine, culture and journalism are all imploding, and we build better versions from the ground up.
HG: Charles Eisenstein said on this show that when systems crumble—and we see the things we trusted crumbling before our eyes—new things can be built. We remember what is important to us. We might have to have a resurgence of understanding the possibilities. We are capable of building and renewing our spirits and humanity in profound ways. This is a shakeup of sorts. It is going to all settle into something beautiful. That is my hope.
NW: It is up to us. It won’t settle into something beautiful without our affirmative choice.
HG: We have to make a moral choice. We have agency. People can take all the information you are putting forth or they can turn a blind eye, but you can’t say that you didn’t do your part, nor can anyone who is on this train of trying to get helpful information out to people. You are a journalist and advocate and not a doctor, but I still want to ask, if readers could do just one thing to improve their health, what would you recommend?
NW: Sunshine! It turns out that the wisdom from before the Rockefeller-petrochemical-pharmaceutical-industrial complex took hold—fresh air, exercise, nutrition and sitting in the sun and socializing—is incredibly good for your health and your immune system. Given all the stuff that is already inside many of us, that is the advice I give my loved ones. And please tell everyone to order their Pfizer Documents Analysis Reports book.1 Give a copy to your representative, doctor and loved ones. It is helping to change the environment of information. Thank you so much.
REFERENCES
- DailyClout. War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Reports. https://dailyclout.io/product/war-room-dailyclout-pfizer-documents-analysis-volunteers-reports-book-paperback/
- Wolf N. The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and the War Against the Human. All Seasons Press; 2022.
- Pfeiffer MB. The missing babies of Europe. RESCUE with Michael Capuzzo, Substack, Nov. 28, 2022. https://rescue.substack.com/p/the-missing-babies-of-europe
- Wolf N. Lipid nanoparticles: are they subtly changing human beings? DailyClout, Oct. 6, 2022. https://dailyclout.io/lipid-nanoparticles-are-they-subtly-changing-human-beings/
- https://www.twc.health/
- https://www.blessedbyhisblood.com/
- https://substack.com/@sashalatypova
- https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews
- Skidmore M. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. details how the NSA was in charge of Operation Warspeed’s [sic] COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the history of the United States bioweapons program, and why Anthony Fauci is the highest-paid government official in history. Lighthouse Economics, May 13, 2023. https://mark-skidmore.com/2023/05/13/robert-f-kennedy-jr-details-how-the-nsa-was-in-charge-of-operation-warspeeds-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-the-history-of-the-united-states-bioweapons-program-and-why-anthony-fauci-is-the-highest-paid/
This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Summer 2023
🖨️ Print post
Leave a Reply