FDA Concedes Raw Milk Across State Lines OK for Personal Consumption |
|
|
|
| Written by Kimberly Hartke | ||||
| November 17 2011 | ||||
FDA CONCEDES RAW MILK ACROSS STATE LINES OK FOR PERSONAL CONSUMPTION But continues to broadcast misinformation about unpasteurized dairy
Washington, DC ( November 17, 2011)—In a statement issued on November 1, concurrent with a raw milk freedom rally held outside FDA headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland, the agency conceded that it “has never taken, nor does it intend to take, enforcement action against an individual who purchased and transported raw milk across state lines solely for his or her own personal consumption” [www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/MilkSafety/ucm277854.htm]. This statement reverses FDA’s prior position in which the agency reserved the option of taking action against individual consumers crossing state lines with raw milk. Federal regulation 21 CFR § 1240.61 prohibits the introduction of raw milk for human consumption into interstate commerce.
A caravan of moms brought raw milk across state lines on November 1 and served it to rally participants in front of FDA headquarters.
“Unfortunately, FDA’s announcement allowing individuals to transport raw milk across state lines is filled with the same misinformation that the agency has spread in the past,” says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation, an organization that sponsors A Campaign for Real Milk, aimed at universal access to clean raw milk. “FDA continues to insist that raw milk is dangerous, when even the agency’s own exaggerated list of outbreaks shows that raw milk is safer than other foods.”
“FDA lists outbreaks associated with raw cheese, produced in less than sanitary conditions, as ‘outbreaks caused by raw milk,’ thereby inflating the number of illnesses associated with raw milk,” says Fallon Morell. “The actual number of illnesses associated (but not necessarily proved) with raw milk is about forty-two per year, which makes raw milk a very safe food given the large number of raw milk consumers. No deaths have been associated with raw milk during the past twelve years, but three people have died from tainted pasteurized milk.”
FDA insists that raw milk drinkers constitute less than 1 percent of the population. Yet a 2007 government survey found that about 3 percent of the population consumes raw milk, or about nine million people. This number is likely to be higher today as raw milk consumption is growing rapidly. Even in the state of Maryland, where raw milk sales are illegal, over 3 percent of respondents stated that they drank raw milk. “This milk is coming from Pennsylvania, where raw milk sales are legal,” says Pete Kennedy, president of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, “to the great detriment of Maryland farmers.” According to Kennedy, hundreds of thousands of dollars of farm sales each year flow from Maryland to Pennsylvania.
The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund is currently representing citizens challenging the interstate ban on raw milk in an Iowa federal district court .
According to Fallon Morell, “FDA continues to insist that no science exists to substantiate the nutritional and health benefits of raw milk, yet we now have five European studies, published in peer reviewed journals, showing that raw milk provides powerful protection against asthma and allergies. And there is copious scientific research showing that pasteurization of milk denatures and diminishes the effectiveness of enzymes and vitamins in the milk.”
Moreover, raw milk is designed to build the immune system—the components that do this are denatured by the heat process of pasteurization. FDA claims that the elderly, the immune-compromised, children and pregnant women especially should avoid raw milk. “These are the very people who need it the most,” says Fallon Morell.
The Weston A. Price Foundation is a nutrition education non-profit with 550 local chapters worldwide, and close to 13,000 members. The organization works to educate the public about the health benefits of unprocessed milk from grass-based dairies through its Campaign for Real Milk, http://realmilk.com.
CONTACT: Kimberly Hartke, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , 703-860-2711, cell 703-675-5557
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 3210 Comments (5)
![]()
...
written by Kimpeer Morris, Feb 15 2012
When did we become a country that allows our government to tell us what to eat, what to drink, or how to live our lives. I know what is best for me no one else. I was given the right by God. I think the main reason they are against raw milk and locally grown food is money. Farmers in states where raw milk is illegal to buy are forced to sell to dairy company that is paying them little to nothing for their milk which they sale at double or triple the price at the grocery stores. If farmers can sell their milk on their own to people who want it the farmer and the consumer set the price, and the dairy companies’ profits are cut that is what the laws are all about crony capitalism period.
Here in Maryland
written by Warren Jones, Jan 26 2012
I live in Maryland and I live right next to a dairy farm but they will not give me raw milk. The owner once told me he would rather be caught with marijuana than raw milk in his car. That goes to show how wasteful government resources are allocated and the punishment certainly not fitting the crime. Anyways, throughout Maryland there are supply chains coming from Pennsylvania down through Delaware into Maryland. It would be much better if we could just buy it locally...
http://goo.gl/tLM0Y Everyone should read that book to learn more about the politics that is raw milk and you will understand why things are how they are today.
...
written by Isabel, Jan 25 2012
So why can't Organic Pastures (a CA supplier) ship their raw milk out of state? I would think that now this has passed they could sell out of state again.
...
written by Wolverine, Jan 06 2012
I am an intestinal transplant survivor who has been drinking raw milk ever since my transplant. Even though I am on immunosuppressant medication, I have had no infections since consuming raw milk. The surgeons told me that all intestinal transplant patient become lactose intolerant after surgery and they were right, at least as far as pasteurized milk is concerned. I cannot tolerate pasteurized dairy since my transplant. Something in the pasteurized dairy causes severe diarrhea, but I have no issues with raw milk. If it weren't for raw dairy, I would be impossible for me to consume any dairy at all.
I have had less complications than any of the other intestinal recipients since consuming raw dairy and have had no rejection issues. There is a dramatic difference in how my transplanted organs respond to pasteurized dairy as compared to raw.
... written by Angie Foster, Jan 04 2012
We made the switch to raw milk 4 years ago and have never looked back. Our entire family has benefitted from the change. My infant daughter at the time struggled with formula when I was no longer able to breastfeed at 8 months, she lost weight, became guant, and developed respitory illnesses that landed us in the ER several times. After visiting specialist after specialist with no avail, my father told me to go find a cow because that is what they did for me when I had similar issues(ironically I grew up in Iowa at the time, not sure what the law stated back then). The transformation was anything but miraculous. Not only did she gain weight and the mysterious "allergies" and illness go away, but my son's eczema disappeared and my husbands seasonal allergies have improved dramatically. We currently reside in Nebraksa and would like to move back to Iowa to be closer to family, but I'm not willing to give up my "wonder milk". I hope that Iowa will lift the ban so we can be reuinited with family once again.
Write comment
|





