đ¨ď¸ Print post
The Massachusetts legislature is considering S.347, a bill that strengthens medical freedom and protects the doctorâpatient relationship by allowing physiciansânot state bureaucratsâto determine when vaccination may endanger a childâs health.
If passed, this bill would ensure that a childâs own doctor has the final say in issuing a medical exemption, based on their complete knowledge of the childâs medical history, family health background, and individual risk factors. It also prohibits the Massachusetts Department of Public Health from overturning that exemption and protects physicians from retaliation for providing it in good faith.
Under current law, school officials and the Department of Public Health can challenge or override a physicianâs medical exemption, undermining the doctorâpatient relationship and exposing children to potential harm. S.347 closes that loophole by giving physicians full authority to issue a medical certification when, in their professional judgment, vaccination poses a risk to the childâs health.
This simple, commonsense measure restores trust in individualized medical care, protects medical privacy, and prevents intimidation of physicians who act in the best interest of their patients.
Please take a few minutes to contact your Massachusetts legislators and urge them to SUPPORT S.347 to protect medical freedom and childrenâs health! The session ends 11-19-25, so letâs make our voices heard TODAY!
TAKE ACTION
Contact your Massachusetts State Senator and Representative and ask them to SUPPORT S.347.
You can look up your legislators here:
https://malegislature.gov/Search/FindMyLegislator
Phone calls are most effective, but emails help tooâboth take just a few minutes.
Sample Script:
âHi, my name is ___ and Iâm a constituent. Iâm calling to ask Senator/Representative ___ to SUPPORT S.347, which protects the doctorâpatient relationship and strengthens medical exemption rights for children in Massachusetts.
This bill ensures that a childâs physicianânot the Department of Public Healthâcan determine when vaccination could endanger that childâs health. It also protects doctors from retaliation for making good-faith medical judgments and keeps a childâs exemption confidential within the school health program.
Medical decisions should be made by families and their trusted doctors, not by bureaucrats. Please vote YES on S.347 to support parental rights, medical privacy, and individualized care for Massachusetts children.â
TALKING POINTS
- You support S.347 because it restores trust in the doctorâpatient relationship and protects children whose health may be endangered by vaccination. Vaccine injury is real and not rare.
- The bill ensures that physiciansânot state officialsâhave final authority to determine when vaccination is medically unsafe for a child.
- Your family doctor better understands your childâs full medical history, family health background, and individual risk factorsâinformation a state bureaucrat simply doesnât have.
- A childâs medical care should never be one-size-fits-all. Every child is unique, and only a trusted physician who knows the child personally can make an informed decision about whether vaccination is appropriate.
- School officials are not qualified to override private medical decisions. Their role is education, not medical evaluation. Allowing school physicians or bureaucrats to overrule a childâs doctor undermines both parental rights and medical ethics.
- The doctorâpatient relationship is built on trust and confidentiality. Families deserve to make private medical choices with their trusted physicianâfree from interference, intimidation, or review by state or school personnel.
MORE INFORMATION
Text, status, and history of S.347:
https://malegislature.gov/Bills/194/S347


Leave a Reply