OPPOSE CDC’s PROPOSED NEW “RULE” TO ILLEGALLY DETAIN AND FORCEBLY VACCINATE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY
People from EVERY state need to act now and OPPOSE the recently proposed, draconian “rule” that would allow CDC to stop, detain, quarantine AND “treat” (including vaccinate) any American or non-American person entering the U.S. or traveling between states simply for suspicion of being infected by a communicable disease.
CDC has proposed a “rule” that would give public health officials the power to apprehend and detain people they believe are sick (or could become sick) and enter into an “agreement” to “treat” them without due process or right of appeal.
It is extremely important to make your voice heard by Friday, October 14, 2016 by submitting comments to CDC opposing this new rule. See action to take below.
We MUST stop CDC from overstepping its authority. The new “rule” states CDC will have “police powers” for “the benefit of society.” Such extraordinary powers could lead to the abuse of U.S. citizens’ lives, privacy, freedom, livelihood, liberty, health, and wellbeing. In essence, if the new “rule” passes, CDC will have authority to take ownership of your life.
This new “rule” is not acceptable. CDC needs to amend its regulations to first and foremost protect the rights of all Americans by allowing them self-determination and personal health privacy and liberty. We cannot allow CDC to coerce people into “agreements” of compliance of federal recommendations. CDC must respect the rights of the individual and allow for the least restrictive means of quarantine including permitting people to be in their own homes and allowing them to choose the type of health care or treatment that they themselves deem beneficial.
CDC’s newly proposed rule is published in the Federal Register [Federal Register Number: 2016-18103] available online here.
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases#h-32
ACTION TO TAKE:
Submit in writing your comments to the CDC by Friday, October 14, 2016
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases#open-comment
Be sure to write your comments in a word document and then cut and paste when submitting online. You will have a limited amount of time to comment before your session times out.
OR
Option to Mail in to: Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS E-03, Atlanta, GA 30329
ATTN: Quarantine NPRM.
Be sure to identify your comments by Docket No. CDC-2016-0068 or
RIN 0920-AA63
Instructions per CDC: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. Do not include any information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. HHS/CDC will carefully consider and address all comments submitted and may revise the content of the rule as appropriate at the final rulemaking stage. HHS/CDC will publish a final rule after the comment period that reflects any content changes made as a result of comments received.
Comments will be available for public inspection from Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Eastern Time, at 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. Please call ahead to 404-498-1600 and ask for a representative from the Division of Global Migration and Quarantine (DGMQ) to schedule your visit.
Talking points:
1) You have deep concerns about any “rule” that would give CDC such totalitarian, unconstitutional, unchecked, unprecedented powers, self-described as “police powers.”
2) You oppose the military-like powers the new “rule” would grant CDC. Powers usurped and abused like in Nazi Germany.
“When an apprehension occurs, the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her discussion with an HHS/CDC public health or quarantine officer.”
3) The new “rule” will allow health officials to treat you, including vaccination, a medical treatment that carries with it the risk of serious injury and death, without confirmation that you are sick.
“…the proposed practice to issue Federal orders before a medical examination has taken place.”
4) You oppose forced or chorused medical treatment of any kind. The new “rule” takes away informed consent and therefore contravenes the international human rights agreements such as the Nuremburg Code and the Untied Nations Declaration of Human Rights. The new “rule” pertaining to entering into an “agreement” would make people unknowingly agree to undergo federally recommended health care treatments and loose their right to decline recommended treatment measures, including vaccines and other treatments.
“CDC may enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as the CDC considers to be reasonably necessary, indicating that the individual consents to any of the public health measures authorized under this part, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment: provided that the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part.” [CJF emphasis added]
5) The new “rule” would give CDC unfettered power to add or delete any diseases that fit their criteria. For example, this means seasonal flu or measles or Zika may be added at CDC’s discretion. You oppose such vague criteria.
“By its terms, subsection (a) does not seek to limit the types of communicable disease for which regulations may be enacted, but rather applies to all communicable diseases that may impact human health.”
6) CDC is attempting to radically change their definition of what constitutes an “ill” person by including a wide range of vague symptoms such as an ill appearance that may be assessed by officials without medical training. You oppose this nebulous definition.
7) Simply being identified as having been at risk of exposure makes one classifiable as having a “precommunicable disease,” which can thereby result in one’s apprehension, quarantine and vaccination. You are firmly against this.
“HHS/CDC defines precommunicable stage to mean the stage beginning upon an individual’s earliest opportunity for exposure to an infectious agent and ending upon the individual entering or reentering the communicable stage of the disease or, if the individual does not enter the communicable stage, the latest date at which the individual could reasonably be expected to have the potential to enter or reenter the communicable stage.”
8) The new “rule” allows for criminal penalties. You, not the government. own your body
“…individuals who violate the terms of the agreement or the terms of the Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release (even if no agreement is in place between the individual and the government), he or she may be subject to criminal penalties.”
9) You oppose the “rule” that says once an individual is released from
custody and/or mandatory treatment, the individual would be subject to ongoing surveillance and tracking. You oppose giving CDC full access to your electronic life.
“HHS/CDC has proposed a definition for ‘electronic or internet-based monitoring’ that defines this term as referring to mechanisms or technologies allowing for the temporary public health supervision of an individual under conditional release, including electronic mail, SMS texts, video conference or webcam technologies, integrated voice-response systems, entry of information into a web-based forum, wearable tracking technologies, and other mechanisms or technologies as determined by the Director or supervising health authority.”
10) The truth is, quarantines should be in reverse — recently vaccinated individuals should stay home to protect others. You would not want to be placed in an environment with sick or recently vaccinated individuals.
Important Note: Unfortunately, the publication Snopes has put out bad press about groups opposing the newly proposed “rule” found in the CDC’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM.) http://www.snopes.com/cdc-forced-vaccinations/
We would like to clarify that we believe our alert is accurate and stand strong in our convictions that people must stand up and stop the expansion of government authority over our and our children’s bodies. According to Snopes, the government would not use the new “rule” to overstep its boundaries and those that oppose the new “rule” are overreacting. However, Snopes is not a reputable source of news or fact checking. Snopes is nothing more than a husband and wife team who use “official” government sites as a source of information, even when those government sites are accused of fraud. Snopes should not be considered the arbiter of truth. In addition, award-winning investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, a journalist for whom we have tremendous respect, classifies Snopes as one of the top ten astroturfers, as in fake grassroots or disinformation, on the web.” Link: http://sharylattkisson.com/trending/snopes/
If you read the CDC’s NPRM carefully you will see that CDC is indeed looking to grant itself full authority to forcibly detain and vaccinate any traveler suspected of being infected with ANY new or existing communicable disease. Take the measles “outbreak” in California last year of less than 200 people for example. According to CDC’s NPRM you and your family could be quarantined and treated for measles. Again, if you read the NPRM carefully, you will see wording like “typically” that conflicts with the idea that people would be able to opt out of an “agreement” for detention and treatment.
“An agreement will typically include a statement indicating the individual chooses to enter into the agreement on a voluntary basis, without duress or coercion, and with full knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his/her individual case.”
🖨️ Print post
I am vehemently opposed to mandatory vaccination so I am opposed to CDC’s proposed new rule to illegally detain and force vaccination on American citizens.
I oppose the proposed rule by the Health and Human Services Department towards the Control of Communicable Diseases be stopped and banned altogether. This “rule” is unconstitutional, violates my human rights, and goes against my religious beliefs. Needless to say, it also violates my civil liberty and, most every human right.
Instead, I propose to enact “rules” which are not devastating, invasive, or destructive to their body, mind, and spirit. Design programs (which are culturally sensitive) that promote the intake of whole foods (minimally processed) with access across all demographics and socioeconomic statuses. Promote and allow public access to Complementary and Alternative modalities (energy healing, sacred ceremonies, plant based medicines and herbal remedies, massage, prayer, TCM, etc.).
Create real health policies that are patient focused (better care, less expensive, improved health outcomes, etc.) and are not based on health insurance companies’ profits alone. Teach real nutrition, without the financial input from Big Agricultural and pharmaceutical companies. Design public health education and disease prevention programs, which educate people in ways to build and maintain healthy immune systems and function.
Instilling rules which promote mandatory vaccinations is not the answer.
I am opposed to CDC’s proposed new rule to detain and force vaccination on American citizens.
people who don’t believe in pharmaceuticals and are alternative health believers, should not have to succumb
to paid for big pharms. robots. natural health can be ten times better than chemicals made by big pharm.
With natural health, life expectancy was 30 years and infectious disease was the number one killer of children under 5. I don’t want to go there. Besides, this story has already been reported as fake.
Where can I find proof of this story being fake?
N o
N O
N O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe you will be interested in my comments to the CDC:
Concerning CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068:
I oppose rules that seek to abrogate my right to determine how to care for myself. Especially rules made by people who set themselves up as experts and under that guise, promote their investments (Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines) by forcing them on individuals who don’t want them. And that is what this new ruling will do.
I oppose the use of authority and force to make people do something considered unhealthy for themselves. And that is what the CDC intends by this new ruling. The Nazi’s did it. Stalin did it. Mao did it.
I oppose people who say they want to make you safe, or healthy, with ingredients/chemicals that are commonly known to contain mercury, heavy metals, blood from other animals, pooled blood from unknown people, and that have been known to cause injury to the recipient. This is what the CDC wants to do with this ruling.
I believe in “informed consent” and “exercising the right to say no to any medical treatment. I oppose Federal Orders for any kind of treatment.
The Federal Government and its agencies have threatened us with many “pandemics” now, that didn’t pan out. Many believe we are being lied to in order to get our support for the poisoning they intend to give us. I oppose the use of any and all latest virus pandemic scares against the public to get them to give up their right to self-determination of how to treat their own health. There should be no criminal penalties on anyone who choses alternative treatments to government (and its agencies) care.
I oppose tracking and surveillance of citizens in general, but especially for medical purposes described by this propose rule.
I am in opposition to CDC Docket No. CDC-2016-0068 for these reasons.
I vehemently oppose this Nazi rule
Are they insane. Stop this action now. We are not a communist.
This is an outrage. forcibly injecting individuals is beyond any reason and a violation of rights.(against unreasonable search and seizure). any legislator who supports this should be prosecuted for intent to deny citizen(s) this right.
I do not want the CDC to have any authority to force vaccinations or any other medical procedures on a citizen of the USA.
Concerning CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068:
I oppose rules that seek to abrogate my right to determine how to care for myself. Especially rules made by people who set themselves up as experts and under that guise, promote their investments (Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines) by forcing them on individuals who don’t want them. And that is what this new ruling will do.
I oppose the use of authority and force to make people do something considered unhealthy for themselves. And that is what the CDC intends by this new ruling. The Nazi’s did it. Stalin did it. Mao did it.
I oppose people who say they want to make you safe, or healthy, with ingredients/chemicals that are commonly known to contain mercury, heavy metals, blood from other animals, pooled blood from unknown people, and that have been known to cause injury to the recipient. This is what the CDC wants to do with this ruling.
I believe in “informed consent” and “exercising the right to say no to any medical treatment. I oppose Federal Orders for any kind of treatment.
The Federal Government and its agencies have threatened us with many “pandemics” now, that didn’t pan out. Many believe we are being lied to in order to get our support for the poisoning they intend to give us. I oppose the use of any and all latest virus pandemic scares against the public to get them to give up their right to self-determination of how to treat their own health. There should be no criminal penalties on anyone who choses alternative treatments to government (and its agencies) care.
I oppose tracking and surveillance of citizens in general, but especially for medical purposes described by this propose rule.
I am in opposition to CDC Docket No. CDC-2016-0068 for these reasons.
Just put a comment with the CDC. What will this do? I’m afraid short of FORCING them to stop, we won’t be able to stop them. That means the end of travelling 🙁
I think they would definately like to regulate intra-state travel, maybe this was the idea to begin with….
I am in opposition to CDC Docket No. CDC-2016-0068…..we are suppose to be a free nation….we have a right to say NO….I do not want anyone to have authority to force vaccinations or any other medical procedure on me my family or anyone else that is a US citizen….
I am strongly opposed to DCD Docket No CDC-2016-0068. I oppose laws that seek to abrogate my right to determine how to care for myself. I oppose the use of authority that would force people in this country to be vaccinated against their wishes or desire, especially since there is strong evidence and proof that the ingredients in vaccines are not in my best health interests. As I understand it, It is unconstitutional to force anyone to have vaccinations or any other medial procedure that is against their will or desire. The pharmaceutical industry does not have the right to mandate this on the citizens of this country.
This CDC-2016-0068 is a very bad thing.
I am strongly opposed to DCD Docket No CDC-2016-0068. UnAmerican, unconstitutional, heinous crime.
RE: The Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Docket No. CDC-2016-0068 or RIN 0920-AA63
I am profoundly concerned about this proposed new rule which would give the CDC unconstitutional, unchecked and unprecedented “police powers” to forcible detain and vaccinate citizens in our country without due process.
These powers are more in line with dictatorships and an unfree people that with the principles the United States was founded upon. By instituting such regulations you are in effect enslaving free people and coercing them to do your will while at the same time denying any responsibility for any adverse outcome that may occur.
This new rule takes from a supposedly free people the idea of informed consent. If I am not mistaken, this violates not only our own Constitution but the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. When the CDC decides to apprehend an individual, and the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her medical treatment that carries with it the risk of injury and death, without confirmation that the individual is sick, this is a clear violation of that person’s human rights.
The CDC is an agency not held accountable to the People, and therefore should restrain itself from inflicting harm through the destruction of liberty on We the People. If it chooses to continue down this despotic path unchecked, we have become a people enslaved and I weep for all that my wonderful country has lost.
I oppose the CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068:CDC, this is completely unconstitutional and in violation of our human rights.
I am Very Opposed to CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068:CDC Violating our rights, will not be tolerated by the general public The Government is not Bigger than the people who created it! We the People!~ This is unconstitutional and goes against everything America Stands for. This is Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, Remember that! Omit, Overturn, and Get rid of this ridiculous proposal!
Thank you for leaving my health care to me.
INFORMED CONSENT: Nazi Germany: all Rights were violated. We will not succumb!
I oppose forced or chorused medical treatment of any kind. The new “rule” takes away informed consent and therefore contravenes the international human rights agreements such as the Nuremburg Code and the Untied Nations Declaration of Human Rights. The new “rule” pertaining to entering into an “agreement” would make people unknowingly agree to undergo federally recommended health care treatments and loose their right to decline recommended treatment measures, including vaccines and other treatments.
I own my body! It is MINE. It belongs to me and me alone.
I also oppose this proposal on the grounds of unconstitutional.
Say what you want about the Snopes group, they are accurate in their assessment of the the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068. If you haven’t read the actual notice from start to finish, please do so in order to have a clearer picture of what is proposed. Although the situation is not as dire as the alarmists would have you belief, there are still some points of concern. Posting my comments on the Weston Price Foundation website or Facebook won’t get my voice voice heard by the CDC. I’ll be adding my comments to the docket this afternoon at https://www.regulations.gov/comment?D=CDC-2016-0068-0001.
Cease and desist any kind of Forced Vaccinations upon the American people. This is not acceptable under any circumstances. If vaccinations have to be forced, then, by deduction, there must be an unterior motive that is not savory. No one should be made to consent to a vaccination if they do not wish it in the first place.
I oppose to CDC Docket Number CDC-2016-0068:CDC for Violating our right to made the choice about
our own body for It is unconstitutional to force anyone to have vaccinations or any other medial
procedure that is against their will or desire. The pharmaceutical industry does not have the right to mandate this on the citizens of USA
NOBODY ON EARTH SHOULD BE FORCED TO TAKE ANY MEDICINE OR VACCINE THEY DO NOT CHOOSE TO TAKE. EVER. THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF FASCISM.