An Inconvenient Study

🖨️ Print post

An Inconvenient Study
Executive Producer – Del Bigtree
https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com

The vaccine debate rages on. Are vaccines safe and effective? No government-sanctioned or -funded studies have shown vaccines in general to be dangerous. So, there is nothing to worry about, right? Well. . . .

Independent studies comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children have shown a dramatic difference in outcomes. The unvaccinated are the clear winners. At least one study showed that DTP-vaccinated victims had five times the mortality of those who did not receive a DTP vaccine. Other studies showed that allergies and autism were 500 and 400 percent more common in the vaccinated, respectively.

One strategy to dismiss these studies (be­sides sealing them behind a cone of silence) is to claim they are too small to prove anything. A major part of this video, produced by Del Bigtree, looks in detail at a large study done by a well-respected medical authority at Henry Ford Health. This center has a very large data­base that includes a large number of completely unvaccinated children. When one of the lead doctors there was asked to do a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study—and publish the results, no matter the outcome—he agreed.

This doctor was not just pro-vax, he was in favor of mandates—so you can probably guess how he expected his study to turn out. When the results turned out to be dramatically different than expected, he changed his mind about pub­lishing the study. He is shown on hidden camera footage confirming that he believed it was a good study and that the information should be made public. But he couldn’t do it. He even said at one point that he was not a good person. At least he was honest enough with himself and others to admit that. However, it is not my in­tent to harshly judge the lead investigator. Why didn’t he want to publish the study? Because he believed it would mean the end of his career. I’m sure he’s right. Is that how science works, by sweeping unpopular data under the rug and destroying the career of anyone who dares to pull up the rug?

When I say the results of the study were dramatic, let me give you a few numbers to illustrate. Children who were vaccinated had around four times the rate of asthma, six times the rate of autoimmune disorders, five and a half times the neurodevelopmental disorders and four times the rate of speech disorders. In comparison, the unvaccinated had zero diabetes, ADHD or learning disabilities.

We can hope that this film helps people learn to distinguish between science and reli­gion. “The science is settled” is not a scientific statement, it is a religious statement. Mandates spring from these religious pronouncements. I’m not against religion. Everyone has a religion, but in the U.S., at least, you are not supposed to mandate a religion. Attorney Aaron Siri is featured in this film, and I have reviewed his excellent book, Vaccines, Amen, which goes deeper into this subject (see page 65).

The most popular argument against these types of studies is that correlation does not prove causation. That is true. You can argue that the correlation between touching a hot stove and a burned finger is “coincidence,” but the coinci­dence is so consistent and the consequence so severe and immediate that I don’t know anyone who wants to ignore that correlation a second or third time.

In the last fifty years, we have seen a rise in diabetes, food allergies, allergies in general, turbo cancer, autism, obesity, the conditions labeled AIDS and Covid, and men who could win wet T-shirt contests. This is the track record of our current healthcare system. Why would anyone want to continue down this road to ruin? Why cling so tightly to systemic child sacrifice? Maybe one more study needs to be done to de­termine whether there is any intelligent life on this planet (but who would do the study?). This film does a great job of raising awareness about the insanity fueled by our healthcare system. The thumb is UP.

🖨️ Print post