Vaxxed—From Cover-Up to Catastrophe
Produced by Del Bigtree
Cinema Libre Studio
“The CDC can no longer be trusted to do vaccine safety work … can’t be trusted to be transparent….” This is a quote from William W. Thompson, PhD, a senior scientist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Thompson is a whistleblower who was recorded without his knowledge by Brian Hooker, PhD. These recorded phone conversations along with study data revealed that the CDC had clear evidence of a connection between autism and vaccines a long time ago. This is a key thing to understand before getting into any discussion about the subject.
So when you hear Bill Gates, for example, who is shown in this video, emphatically insisting that scientists have debunked the vaccine-autism link, ask yourself who debunked it. Mr. Gates and doctors in general see the CDC as the ultimate source of data on all medical subjects. The parakeets in the news media uncritically repeat what they hear from the CDC, considering it settled doctrine that shall not be questioned further. Anyone outside of officially sanctioned authority who has the gall to ask questions is one who probably also believes the earth is flat and Santa Claus is real. They may also be terrorists.
The credibility of the CDC takes another hit when we see a high-ranking CDC official testifying before Congress. When asked whether double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have been done on vaccines, the CDC official generates two minutes of meaningless babble. The congressman asks again for a simple yes or no answer and gets a subdued admission that the studies have not been done. The congressman then thanks the CDC official for wasting two minutes of his time.
Another point that the parakeets like to make is that the whole autism-vaccine link is based on one study by Andrew Wakefield. The British Medical Journal (BMJ) published the study and then un-published it due to claims of fraud. Therefore, the parakeets say, the autism-vaccine link is debunked. One problem with that line of argument is the fact that the study explicitly said it did not prove that the MMR vaccine causes autism, but that more study was needed. Another problem is that all of the other scientists running that study went to court to defend themselves against the claim of fraud—and they won. The courts scrutinized the study and found no evidence of fraud. Wakefield himself was not cleared at the time only because he did not have the money to defend himself in court. So exactly what was the BMJ so upset about that they pulled the study? They seem to be acting more fraudulently than Wakefield.
The U.S. government granted the pharmaceutical industry immunity from prosecution for any harm due to vaccines. If vaccines are so safe and wonderful, why is that necessary? If any other industry produces a defective product that harms people, they get no such immunity. Why does the pharmaceutical industry get special treatment? A “Vaccine Court” was set up to hear cases where citizens make claims against vaccines. This court has awarded over three billion dollars of taxpayer money. It seems vaccines are not as perfect as we are led to believe.
Experts often claim that autism is genetic, but the explosive growth in the number of cases gives away the absurdity of the claim. Stephanie Seneff clearly explains that the growth in the number of autism cases is exponential. If it continues, our medical system and our whole culture will be crushed under the load of that many functionally impaired people.
In the film, two pediatricians who regularly used vaccines in their practice were given the data from William Thompson. After reviewing the data carefully, they were convinced that the CDC lied. One of them asked the best question ever: “If they lied about this, what else are they lying about?” I have said many times that lies are like cockroaches. Where you see one, there are ten thousand more you don’t see. My upward-pointing thumb would like to know what else they are lying about.
This film is not just well done, it exposes a serious danger to the most vulnerable members of our society—our infants and children. It is also indirectly showing us how those in power respond and who they really answer to. The information comes from an insider who was recorded without his knowledge. If you want to convince me this information is all wrong, you will first have to convince me that you are a better source than the insider. Good luck.
This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2017.🖨️ Print post
Leave a Reply