Butterfly of the Week, 16 November: The “90%” Mythical Pfizer/Moderna Unicorns
By David E. Martin
Operation Warp Speed sounds very Star Trek—very high-tech, very advanced. We are releasing the medical technical ninjas to develop a Covid-19 vaccine in record time. Wow. Moderna and Pfizer proudly report their messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are 90 to 95 percent effective. David Martin looks behind the curtain at the details of all this, and he doesn’t seem very excited.
Martin finds a quote from Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna. Zaks says, “Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission because, in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.” That is one of the finer pieces of double-talk I have ever heard. Here is the translation into straight talk. What Moderna and Pfizer are really developing is something to reduce symptoms. A pain-killer. A vaccine is traditionally defined as something to reduce or eliminate a disease and prevent or at least lower transmission of the disease. So, whatever they are developing is not really a vaccine. Why? That Zaks quote basically says, because they don’t have enough time. You can’t develop a real vaccine in such a short time.
Almost immediately after Moderna and Pfizer announce their “vaccines,” Fauci tells us that masks and antisocial distancing will still be needed. These measures are apparently “here to stay.” Well, yeah—because there really is no vaccine.
Traditionally, a vaccine contains some form (active or inactive) of the virus or germ or cootie that stands accused of causing the disease. However, that is not the case with the Moderna/Pfizer potions. Why not? Because this virus that has so many fouling their underwear has never been isolated and purified, according to the CDC. They can’t use it because they don’t have it.
How do the companies know that a coronavirus is really causing the symptoms? Martin went looking for the studies that prove it. Like everyone else who has tried, he found nothing. What he did find was this from the University of Pennsylvania: No study has demonstrated actual clinical evidence of the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Oh, and how does this fake injection work if it doesn’t work the way vaccines have typically been defined to work? Apparently, it messes with your DNA. If you are looking for something that will scare you into incontinence, these injections are good candidates. Do they really turn you into a GMO-human? I don’t know, but I’m not interested in putting it to the test. I have written elsewhere in detail why anyone who thinks they understand DNA well enough to modify it safely instantly qualifies as a drooling idiot.
Meanwhile, our big-pharma-funded news media are all excited about this non-vaccine that is “more than 90 percent effective.” Many people now have looked at the numbers and calculated that the recovery rate for this disease is about 99.5 percent for anyone under age seventy. Explain to me again why we need this injection? Are the news media asking these questions or furnishing any of these details? They don’t have time. They are too busy scaring us with out-of-context numbers of new cases. If you listen carefully, you will notice they talk about cases now, not deaths. Deaths aren’t spiking, just cases. I have lived through the Cold War, Y2K, 9-ll and numerous Godzilla movies. I have never seen fear like I see it now. If this isn’t terrorism, I don’t know what is.
This video is full of great information, though it may be hard for some to follow the details. It would be nice to have the same information presented a little more clearly, but the gist is clear and the thumb is UP.🖨️ Print post