Directed by Mikki Willis
Event 201 was a pandemic exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The exercise explored the then-fictitious scenario of a SARS-like, highly contagious virus spreading around the world and killing millions. Symptoms ranged from mild flu-like symptoms to severe pneumonia. The high-profile exercise participants “speculated” that the pandemic might start by a virus spreading from bats to pigs to humans. They predicted that governments around the world would react in a dictatorial manner, imposing draconian restrictions and arresting any who did not comply. Of course there would be protests. Event 201 was conducted in October 2019.
Within months, this hypothetical exercise transformed into cold reality. What a coincidence! Many of the details of this exercise have played out exactly as predicted. Mikki Willis looks at this and other evidence which indicates that the events of 2020 have not happened randomly or by chance.
One of the strange activities highlighted in this video surrounds U.S. patent number US7220852B1. In 2004, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) applied for a patent for a coronavirus isolated from humans (SARS-CoV). The patent covers “genome and. . . amino acid sequences of the SARS-CoV open reading frames, as well as methods of using these molecules to detect a SARS-CoV and detect infections therewith.” This information appeared in the film, but I copied that last sentence from the patent itself. I did a little homework and found it at patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en. So I know Willis isn’t just making this stuff up. To be clear, this is not the same coronavirus that we are dealing with in 2020.
Willis goes on to ask some awkward questions. It is illegal to patent nature. You cannot patent any natural life form or object, whether it be a blade of grass, a germ, a virus, the Rock of Gibraltar or a duck-billed platypus. How did the CDC get away with obtaining an illegal patent? Another question: Why would the CDC want to patent a virus? It is hard to come up with an answer that sounds good. If it is because they want to study how to treat it, and if it is a major threat to world health, would it not be better to open it up to the world rather than confine it to just CDC resources? And what will they patent next? Water? You can’t get a drink unless you pay a fee to the CDC?
There has been much speculation that at least some coronaviruses were created in the lab and are not natural. If that is the case, why did those responsible do that? An artificially created virus would have to be substantially different from a natural virus to qualify for a patent, but that would make it useless for studying ways to cure natural viruses. The only answer anyone seems to have thought of so far is because they wanted to weaponize it. One small problem there—that is highly illegal under U.S. law and international treaty.
Plandemic presents a lot of evidence indicating that our health overlords are not as pure as the driven snow. Why don’t we hear about this in the mainstream news? Could it be because all of these agencies and operators are part of the vast big pharma syndicate, which generously provides around 80 percent of news media advertising revenue? The news media will not bite the hand that feeds them.
What about government regulators and authorities? Perhaps they are too busy listening to the big pharma lobby, which spends almost twice as much as any other industry lobby. Back in 1986, the vaccine industry was on the brink of bankruptcy because of all the damage vaccines had done. Now Bill Gates describes vaccines as one of the best investments he ever made. What changed? Did the industry suddenly start making safer, better products? No. In 1986, the industry was granted immunity from lawsuits. Pharmaceutical companies are not liable for any adverse effects of their vaccines. If they really cared about your health, why would they campaign for that? Why would Congress go along with something this outrageous? Big pharma must have a pretty good lobby.
This film goes into details, naming agencies and players who stand to profit from the coronavirus. Many would toss this film into the trash bin of “conspiracy theories,” which we have all been programmed to casually disregard with no further or deeper thought. “Just go along with the herd.” “The herd is always right.” Don’t listen to that little voice in your head that asks, “Are there really no conspiracies at all anywhere?”
There is one big question that this film does not ask. Where is the proof that a virus named SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of this new illness called Covid-19? I think most will agree that there is a new illness out there that can be very serious, but that very important question about causation seems only to lead to more censorship, demonization and religious intolerance. The American legal system recognizes that until you hear all sides of a dispute, you cannot know what is going on. Doesn’t that question deserve a straight answer? Is this not important enough for all sides to get a fair hearing?
The film wraps up by suggesting that our most pervasive health problems may be caused by the replacement of real food with factory products, the replacement of natural cures with harmful drugs and the replacement of love and community with fear and isolation. Those who disagree with these conclusions are not doing themselves any favors by censoring, shaming, demonizing and outlawing anyone who disagrees with them. The thumb is UP.
This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly journal of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Fall 2020🖨️ Print post