Under The Microscope: What’s Really In The COVID Shots? With Shimon Yanowitz

What’s really inside the COVID shots?

Electrical engineer and independent researcher Shimon Yanowitz decided he wanted to see for himself. Drawing on his background in semiconductor fabrication and industrial microscopy, Shimon began examining samples of the COVID injections under a microscope, and says what he observed led him down a years-long investigation into nanotechnology, engineering, and the scientific literature.

In this episode, Shimon describes the unusual structures he says he observed in the samples, including ribbons, filaments, and formations resembling electronic circuitry. He explains how he watched some of these structures develop in real time and why he believes what he saw is evidence of self-assembling nanotechnology.

Shimon also discusses his research into DARPA documents and scientific literature, his concerns about the potential effects of these technologies in the human body, and his own experience of becoming ill after working closely with the injectable material. Finally, he shares findings from his recently published paper, From Synthetic DNA and RNA-Based Self-Assembling Nanotechnology to Sequelae of COVID-19 Shots.

WAPF Ad: Become a member today. Just go to The Weston A. Price Foundation and click on the “Member Yet?” button. Use the code POD10 to join for just $30 for the year.

To learn more about Shimon Yanowitz, visit https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shimon-Yanowitz

Shimon Yanowitz’s recent paper titled: “From Synthetic DNA and RNA-Based Self-Assembling Nanotechnology to Sequelae of COVID-19 Shots.”

Join the Nourishing Our Children closed Facebook Group

Check out our sponsors:

GRAY TOAD TALLOW: Use code WISE15 for 15% off.

GODDESS VITALITY FROM OPTIMAL CARNIVORE: Use code WESTON10 for 10% off.

—

Watch the episode here

Episode Transcript

Within the below transcript the bolded text is Kendall Nelson and the regular text is Shimon Yanowitz.

Investigating What Lies Beneath The Surface

Welcome to the show. For years, questions have surrounded the contents of the COVID-19 injections. While much of the public discussion is focused on safety and effectiveness, a small number of independent researchers have taken a different approach, examining the vials themselves under the microscope and asking whether they contain more than what was publicly disclosed. This is episode 601, and our guest is Shimon Yanowitz.

Shimon is an electrical engineer, independent researcher, and associate editor of the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. His background in electromagnetics, materials science, and electrical engineering led him to investigate microscopic images of the COVID-19 injections after reports began emerging of unusual structures appearing in laboratory analysis. He is the co-author of a new paper, From Synthetic DNA and RNA-Based Self-Assembling Nanotechnology to Sequel of COVID-19 Shots, in which he reviews published forensic analysis of vaccine vials, discusses the concept of synthetic shedding, and argues that structures reported by multiple investigators are consistent with advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology.

In this episode, Shimon shares what first led him to investigate the contents of the COVID-19 shots and describes what he says he observed as microscopic structures changed and developed over time. He also explains why he believes the findings described in his paper point to deliberate engineering rather than an unintended phenomenon. These are significant claims that differ substantially from narratives of mainstream health authorities. Throughout our conversation, Shimon explains the evidence and reasoning that led him to those conclusions.

Before we get into the conversation, I want to tell you about the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Weston A. Price Foundation is a member-supported organization. In other words, we can only do education, research, and activism with your help. There’s no other way. Please become a member today. Just go to the Weston A. Price Foundation and click on the Member Yet button. Use the code POD10 to join for just $30 for the year. That’s code POD10. Thanks in advance, and welcome to the family. Now, let’s welcome Shimon Yanowitz.

—

Shimon, welcome to the show. I’m so happy that you’re here. Shimon, you’ve been researching what you believe is actually inside the COVID injections and looking at how they may or may not work. Along the way, you’ve examined microscopy, you’ve done forensic analysis of the vials, you’ve looked at DARPA documents, engineering standards, and you’ve read hundreds of scientific papers. Before we get into what you’ve found, can you tell us just a little bit about your background and how this journey began for you? Why did you start looking at the COVID injections?

My background. I come from electrical engineering and computer science. In my electrical engineering background, I was also involved in, or interested in, the interaction with electromagnetic radiation. That’s the electrical engineering part, and biological systems. Anyway, here we are, or here we were in 2020, something called “COVID” emerged, and then we were told that we should wait for something exciting. Which I call the COVID injectables. Some people mistakenly call these vaccines. I was suspicious about this, and I was very interested.

Curiosity drives true science. Shimon Yanowitz explains why independent researchers began analyzing vial samples firsthand.

I was also involved in some international, a few international groups of scientists, researchers like me, sometimes medical doctors, lawyers, and so on. One of them, for example, is Children’s Health Defense. Here in my country, Israel, I think it was January the 1st, 2021. An airplane landed at the airport, and the delivery of the Pfizer injectables came out, and people started to be injected with this.

I could not ignore the fact that I knew many people who died mysteriously. They began injecting the elderly, the older people. The first victims were the older people. Just continuing to include more and more age groups. This wasn’t good. It did not look good at all. It was clear to me that we needed to examine what it is. What’s wrong with these injections? What’s in the injectables?

The reason I started doing microscopy and looking at this is that I did not want to believe it. I wanted to find out, to see with my own eyes. I obtained a microscope, quite a high-quality microscope. It was very difficult to obtain some viral steps. I was also collaborating with other people in other countries. It was clear that what some other people and I were seeing was not good at all. It did not look like something that should be injected into people.

You’re going to explain to us what it is you were seeing. First, why do not you remind us what people were being told about these shots? What were they being told was in them and how they were supposed to work?

First of all, people were being told that there is a mysterious new disease that is caused by some virus. This virus was named SARS-CoV-2, and the disease was named COVID-19. Now, I did not buy this story, by the way. I still do not buy it. It was just a pretext for rolling out the injectables, but many people did believe it. Maybe 80% of the world population, that is, quite a few billion people, Kendall, stood in line to get this injection. What they were told, or what we were told, I think this is what you asked, is that this said dangerous virus has some proteins around it, which construct its corona.

There are spikes. This is called the spike protein. It’s very interesting. The authorities told us this story. That this spike protein is very toxic, very dangerous. This is what’s causing the virus. It was never shown to be so dangerous. I say never shown to exist because, unlike any previous injections, you could not get an attenuated virus injection or something similar. They said, “We have to come up with new technology. We do not have the virus. What should we do?” The narrative was that we came up with something called mRNA technology.

In this mRNA technology just inject people with mRNAs enveloped in what is called lipid nanoparticles, and somehow these lipid nanoparticles reach the cells, and they open up somehow, and then the mRNAs spill into the volume of the individual cells, and many individual cells are exposed to this mRNA. This mRNA undergoes some biological process, which is a myth, but many people believe in this myth, where mRNA is being translated into a protein. Basically, they told us, “This is a very toxic protein, so we are going to make your body produce it.”

Wise Traditions - Kendall Nelson | Shimon Yanowitz | Nanotechnology — Nanotechnology: When external energy meets liquid samples, microscopic formations begin to assemble in real time.

You are going to poison yourself, because it’s your body that’s producing the toxin. Once you are poisoned, your body is going to try to do something and produce maybe some antibodies, another myth, another hoax, and then you’ll be fine. People were not doing Kendall. People were dying like flies around me. We have, I think, to date, tens of millions of dead people globally and quite a few billion injured people. People, including myself. I was injured not because I took the injection. I was sniffing through my microscope. I was looking at a drug. Obviously, it became clear to me that this was a contagious substance. Here we are today.

I want you to go more into your story. First, let’s talk about what you saw when you first started examining the material on the slides in the microscope. What were you seeing? What was happening?

I have to start with this. It is an interesting and very strange story that there were people around the world who said at the time, “Watch out, look out, these injectables are going to contain nanotechnology.” I do not know how these people got this information, but they are right. I know nanotechnology, and I prepared myself for this. I sharpened my knowledge of what nanotechnology is, what it can do, and then I looked through the microscopes at samples from Pfizer initially and then some others, and I was seeing very strange things typical of nanotechnology.

For example, in nanotechnology, you start with things so small that an optical microscope cannot resolve, and you cannot see anything. You just see a clear liquid, especially when I perfected the method of involving electromagnetic radiation to energize the sample. I could see things starting to form in that clear liquid. They formed into structures, electrical structures. Some of them are described in my paper.

I was able to see the advantage of an optical microscope. You can even have a camera on top and take videos. I was seeing self-assembling nanotechnology, assembling and creating structures. The rumors were, on the other hand. The narrative, the official narrative, is that these are mRNAs, and you cannot see them, and they do some spike protein. All this turned out to be, in my opinion, a fake and a hoax. All I could see was a lot of self-assembling technologies that created structures.

Explain to me a little bit more what that looked like. You would put the substance on the slide, and would it take a week to grow, develop, evolve? Would it happen right before your eyes? How did this happen, and what did these things actually look like?

Real-Time Assembly Under Electromagnetic Radiation

Initially, I would leave the stuff, put it on a glass slide for the microscope, put the coverslip glass on top, and let it stay for a week. Come back to it, and voila, I put it under the microscope, and then I could see that the clear liquid grew structures, or structures developed from that liquid. I had this idea. Maybe I could speed up this process. I just used a very simple trick on my cell phone. I neared it with the microscope, and I was sure to get something played, maybe from YouTube.

Microscopic measurements reveal structures measuring up to 50 microns across, far beyond standard nanoscale expectations.

I knew there was some electromagnetic radiation going back and forth from the telephone to the router and so on, and then I could see things assembling or developing in real time, in front of my eyes. You start with some liquid, and the liquid becomes murky, and then things start to grow within seconds. Two minutes tops. I was expecting it. Any material science or chemical process, you need to energize the process so it performs quicker. This process obviously responded well to electromagnetic radiation, and that was the result.

What would these things look like? You’ve described them in your new paper where they look like ribbons or they look like computer chips. Can you paint us a picture visually of what these things look like that you were seeing as they self-assembled?

Large-Scale Lipid Structures Exceeding Stated Sizes

Let me just add that some things I found that did not assemble, they were already assembled, but they were not lipid nanoparticles. Lipid nanoparticles cannot be seen, although a swarm of many of them can be seen. I could see huge lipid particles, huge on the scale of a microscope. Let’s say, 50 microns. 50 microns is not a nanoparticle. Nanoparticles are maybe 100 nanometers. A micron is 1000 nanometers. I could see lipid particles, sizes 2, 3, 4, up to 50 microns, thousands of nanometers, contrary to what the narrative said, and these were already in there, and they were injected into people.

On top of that, there are assembled structures as you described. Some looked like ribbons, and the ribbons are just something wide and long, and I saw many structures like that being folded over themselves, because obviously if you put something on the glass side and a coverslip on top, you’re restricting its ability to grow as it wants, so you’re forcing it to fold over other structures that look like tubes or filaments and things that look like electronic circuitry. In fact, they look exactly like microchips or motherboards with many components on them. This is the variety of things that I’ve seen.

What would you say to somebody who was a mainstream scientist who said, “What you saw was the result of clotting or crystallization or contamination or cellular debris?” I know you’ve looked at not only the materials of the vaccine or the shots themselves, but you also looked at people’s blood samples. You were seeing these things in their blood as well. What would you say to the naysayer who’s saying, “These are just normal reactions.” It’s just crystallizing, and it’s looking like a computer component or something? How can that not be possible?

Circuitry Patterns Versus Natural Crystal Formations

There are several claims. Regarding the computer chips, there are people who say, “This is just cholesterol crystallization.” We know how cholesterol, or even saline, stable salts dissolved in water, how they crystallize. They do crystallize in rectangles. I was not saying rectangles. I was seeing very complex and elaborate structures comprising some underlying rectangle, and on top of it. I’m an electrical engineer with a high degree in electrical engineering, and I was involved for many years. In semiconductor fabrication and industrial microscopy candles.

I know how electronic chips look. These are not just random crystallization of salts. Some people say, “If you see filaments, then this is maybe dust from the air. Really?” This is protected by a coverslip, and initially there’s nothing, and the microscope can very accurately focus on the liquid. It sees nothing, and then something starts to dry. You want to tell me that this is dust that somehow bypasses protecting coversleep and gets underneath? It became clear, Kendall, that there are two groups of people who are naysayers.

One is the people who are so naive or gullible and just want to believe the authorities. It wasn’t comfortable for them to hear that these injectables are so incredibly nefarious. They’re okay. Probably some rookie error or something like that. It doesn’t have experience in microscopy. It doesn’t know what he’s talking about, but I think there is a second group of naysayers who will say things like crystallization or lipids or things that obviously cannot be crystallization or lipids just because they’re either paid to say that, or they just belong to some other party and decided the party line says that this is true.

Validating Laboratory Findings Through Technical Literature

No, it’s not, and if this is not enough, as you said earlier, I went to the scientific literature, and I wanted to see. Are things such as this described in the scientific literature? It took me 4 or 5 years. Between 2021 and now, because my paper was published maybe two weeks ago or so, I found an amazing wealth of scientific literature that not only describes exactly what I’ve been seeing, but also what they want to do with it. There are YouTube presentations by people, very respectable people.

One of them is a senior IEEE electrical engineering professor who said, “We want to build electronic networks inside your body.” There is Dr. James Giordano, who said, “We want the 21st century to be the century, the time when we have war on your brain, and so on. The combination of forensic microscopy and the facts that the scientific literature amazingly spilled out the beans. We can do this. Here is how we’re doing it.” It’s a clear indication that it can be done. This is not some hallucination or some fantasy. This is certainly very real.

I believe you mentioned James Giordano, and he gave a lecture at West Point on the nature of this nanotechnology and how it can be used in warfare. Can you just expand on that a little bit and tell us what’s been in the works behind the scenes with these people?

Josh Giordano, I think, did not specifically talk about nanotechnology. What he did talk about, though, was waging war on people’s brains. Allegedly for the sake of, I do not know, state security or so, but you can easily extrapolate this from state security to maybe waging war on the entire world. He said, “I want to poison people.” You have to see this YouTube interview. James Drodano just appears so nonchalant, saying, “Do you know the neurotoxin Novichok?

I want to put it in people’s brains.” He said, “We want to disrupt, destroy, disable.” There are two Ds, but he has three Ds. He has three Ns. The three Ns are defined by DARPA, and I give the source in my papers. I think of next-generation non-surgical neuro-disruptive technology. They are talking about all these things. DARPA and the IEEE. IEEE is the Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

The thing is, Kendall, that these people, the ones who designed these technologies and these juxtables, are not medical doctors. They are not biologists. They tell the medical doctors and the biologists some fairy-tale story about, “mRNA is dark protein. Behind their back, they’re doing a bait-and-switch. We talk about mRNA and spike protein, but we’ll inject self-assembling nanotechnology that can do terrible things to the body and your mind.

Engineering journals and published literature outline synthetic network concepts that parallel laboratory observations.

There is my compatriot, Yuval Noah Harari, who is a pet of Klaus Schwab. Klaus Schwab was the head and founder of the World Economic Forum. He said, “I want to do a fourth industrial revolution. What is this fourth industrial revolution? I want to change who you are, not what you do, but who you are.” Yuval Noahari says, “We can hack you. You are a hackable animal.” Meaning we can go into your brain, meddle with your thoughts, with your emotions, change them, monitor them. This is the war, or war is a good word for what we are now experiencing.

Now we’re looking at a potential 5.2 billion people having been injected with these shots, potentially having this nanotechnology inside of them. I read in your paper that when you were describing the things that you were seeing, a lot of them have sharp edges. Not only could it be that you could be getting messages or hooked up somehow or something, but also just the fact that it is inside of you could cause damage to the cells and potentially your organs and all of this stuff, simply because of the sharp edges. Did I read that correctly?

You read that correctly, but I described a few contributing factors to harm to the body. Mechanical laceration is one, but there are others. They are openly discussing, in fact, I showed a press release by Pfizer from 2015, and they were collaborating with another compatriot of mine, Professor Ido Bachelet from Barilani University, on nanorobots. What do they do? They are just containers of very potent toxins, but don’t worry. These toxins are not designed to hurt you or any person.

They are designed to be guided specifically to a place where someone has a malignant tumor. Open up there and spill the potent toxins and just kill the tumor. This nanotechnology can also be a drug delivery system. This is a term you will often see in the scientific literature when they want to describe weapons that can kill people by spilling toxins into their body. They will say, “We found quite a nice, cool way to do drug delivery and deliver toxins exactly to the tumors.”

Kendall, many of the 5.2 billion people did not have any cancerous tumors, and they did not need this technology. I just want to mention briefly that I’m also describing the shedding of this technology, whereby people who are not among the first 5.2 billion who were injected with this can acquire these technologies. I’m an example. I did not get the injectables, but my blood, my cerebrospinal fluid, they all carry the signs of these structures.

Tell us a little bit more about what happened to you while you were examining the materials from the shots under the microscope.

The Reality Of Contamination And Personal Exposure

You need to understand these are hazardous materials. I saw several technologies in these injections, injectables. Some technologies were designed to create a structure or to create these huge lipid particles that are capsules that contain something not so nice. There was a technology for disseminating this in the air through particles and films. I was really naive. There was a sense of urgency again. People are still dying. Some people there are the embalmers who keep pulling feet off of these proteinaceous, huge structures from people’s arteries.

People are being choked to death while alive, with these things drawing their arteries. This is just one of the many mechanisms for killing people that exist there. I was naive. I even find the full depth of the electronic circuitry that can develop from these valves. I sometimes avoided using a cover stick to cover the drop, just to have enough thickness to allow things to grow. Obviously, when you’re seeing perfect rectangles that look like electronic circuitry, this is even less likely to be some fancy crystallization.

This crystallization argument serves the naysayers every time. Every time they want to crystallize it. No, this is very accurate, pinpointed self-assembly of structures. I guess the first time I did this without a coverslip, I remember looking through the binoculars of the microscope, and I was thinking that the central drop started sprouting all over the entire glass slide, and then all over the entire microscope, and probably into my skin, nostrils, eyes, ears, everywhere.

I remember the old boy. Moments that I had then, and I said, “This can’t be good, can it?” Now, Kendall, I am in contact with at least two individuals I’m not going to name around the world to whom this has also happened. They looked at these hazardous materials, and they became infected. We are talking about a contagious, infectious technology. There’s nothing biological. Nonetheless, this can be contagious and infectious.

I’m so sorry that it’s happened to you. How are you feeling? What are the results of being contaminated?

The feeling was like a gradual poison. In particular, as James Giordano predicted, neurological poisoning. If you administer neurotoxins, you start having neurological symptoms. This could be from the top of your head to the bottom of your feet. This started happening to me over the course of maybe three years since I first encountered this. I have been having this problem that is gradually becoming more intense. Again, what do you do? Do you go to your general practitioner and say, “Look, I’m having this nanotechnology poison. Can you do something?”

These medical doctors, some of our respects all of them, and very few, but some are even in the community who do microscopy and try to find out what’s really in there, but we do not know. Sadly, these people are the perpetrators of this thing. They have done an exquisite engineering job. Not that he doesn’t have faults, and some of the damage and injuries can be a result of improper assembly or assembling in the wrong place inside your heart rather than inside your other place.

As a general rule, the entire public, which includes most of the medical doctors and biologists, has no clue what is going on, so they can’t treat people. Even if they knew what’s going on, we do not know how to get this out of the system because nobody has ever published anything. The commissioning protocol. You want to stop this and go and do this or take this? Maybe there is an antidote somewhere, but we do not have it. Someone might have it. We do not.

It seems insane that someone would create a product that could cause this synthetic shedding and, in theory, expose themselves at the same time. Even if they did not take the shot.

Absolutely. Personally, my explanation or my reply to your question is that I think most of the people involved with this do not fully understand the technology, or they believe the official narrative. The people in the very higher-up levels, they must have some protection against this, which I do not know what it is. I’d love to know, so please, I extend an invitation to these people. Please let me into your meetings. I’d like it to suit you. I promise to tell you what I found. Just tell us what it is that you’re doing that can either protect yourself from this effect, or eliminate this from your body if you’ve been affected.

Documenting hard data matters. Read the newly published findings examining structural anomalies under the lens.

Shimon, as we begin to wrap up, can you tell our audience the name of your paper so that they can go and look for it? Tell us just kind of, if you had to summarize what your paper is really going to talk about in just a minute or so, what would you say?

Documenting Observations Tor The Global Scientific Record

If you want the name, I apologize. It’s a rather long name. Let me have a look here. The paper is called From Synthetic DNA and RNA-Based Self-Assembling Nanotechnology to Sequel of COVID-19 Shots. This is the name of the paper. I had a co-author. His name is Daniel Brody. It’s been out there for about two weeks, or I think more. Anybody could just go. It’s not behind any paywall. We’ll just go to the journal and have a look at the PDF file of this paper, with many images and graphic illustrations that I created to describe. I was trying to be as helpful and useful as I could to help the layman visualize the process and what’s going on there.

Shimon, I hope that everybody takes the time to read your paper because it’s extremely important. I wish you all the best with your journey and your personal health. I want to thank you so much for being here.

Thank you so much, Canon.

—

Our guest was Shimon Yanowitz. To learn more about his work and read the paper he recently co-authored, from synthetic DNA and RNA-based self-assembling nanotechnology to the sequel to COVID-19 shots, visit the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research, or simply click on the link included in this episode. This conversation explored one of the most controversial topics of our time. Shimon shared what led him to investigate the contents of the COVID-19 shots, the findings that emerged from his microscopic and forensic analysis, and why he concludes that these observations point to sophisticated bioengineering rather than, for example, unintended contamination.

He also shared his personal experience with synthetic shedding. This research has come at a tremendous personal cost to Shimon, who has devoted years to investigating these questions despite the challenges that accompany work of this nature. Whatever the future holds, scientific discovery has always depended on individuals willing to pursue difficult questions, carefully document their observations, and invite others to examine the evidence.

My hope is that today’s conversation encourages all of us to think critically, remain curious, and continue seeking the truth. I’m Kendall Nelson, the host and producer of the Wise Traditions Podcast on behalf of the Weston A. Price Foundation. For a full transcript of this episode, visit Weston A. Price and click on the Podcast Page. If you’re enjoying the show, we’d be grateful if you’d take a moment to leave a rating or review wherever you tune in. Your feedback helps others discover the podcast and become part of this growing community. Thank you for spending this time with us. Be well, be nourished, and be free.

About Shimon Yanowitz

Shimon D. Yanowitz, M.Sc., is an electrical engineer, independent researcher, and Associate Editor of the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR). His professional background includes advanced industrial microscopy and high-tech engineering; prior to his retirement from industry, he founded and served as president and CEO of a technology company specializing in advanced microscopy systems for semiconductor fabrication.

Today, Yanowitz applies his engineering and microscopy background to independent research, with particular interests in nanotechnology, electromagnetic radiation and its interaction with biological systems. He is the co-author of a recent IJVTPR paper examining synthetic DNA- and RNA-based self-assembling nanotechnology and reported observations associated with COVID-19 injections.