Most scientific journals suggest that vaccines are safe and effective. Many medical personnel says the same. Why would anyone question the “party line”? Is any information missing from the narrative we generally hear around this topic? Today, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., environmental attorney and the founder of the Children’s Health Defense, peels back the curtain on vaccine information.
He starts with the development of the fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine and what early results show (hint: not as promising as Moderna touted them to be). He reveals why we don’t hear more about vaccine risks in the media and what influences the studies that actually get published in medical journals. He reviews the ingredients of vaccines and their side effects which include food allergies, behavior issues, and more serious health concerns including ADD, ADHD, Tourette’s syndrome, narcolepsy, juvenile diabetes, and more. Finally, he encourages us to examine the facts closely ourselves, rather than accepting the vaccine orthodoxy of our day.
Visit Robert’s website: childrenshealthdefense.org.
Become a member of the Weston A. Price Foundation here.
Visit our sponsors’ websites Ancestral Supplements & Green Pasture
Listen to the podcast here
Within the below transcript the bolded text is Hilda
Most scientific journals suggest that vaccines are safe and effective. Medical personnel says the same thing. Why would anyone question the party line? Is any information missing from the narrative that we generally hear around this topic? This is episode 246. Our guest is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He is a well-known and well-regarded attorney, the Founder of the Children’s Health Defense, and an expert on the topic of vaccines.
He peels back the curtain on vaccine information. He starts with the development of the fast-tracked Coronavirus vaccine and what early results show. He explains the difference between a dead virus vaccine and a live virus vaccine. He reveals why we don’t hear more about vaccine risks in general and what influences the studies that get published in medical journals. He reviews the ingredients of vaccines and their effect on the general population, including their relationship to food allergies, behavior issues, and serious health concerns.
Welcome to the show, Robert.
We wanted to have you on because there is so much happening and happening so quickly. We’ve heard a lot about the development of a Coronavirus vaccine. They were talking about promising results from the use of this vaccine that Moderna is developing. Can you speak to that? Is this something we should look forward to?
Fifty-four percent of American citizens have a chronic disease, which is comorbidity. Those don’t react well with vaccines.
We have to look at the vaccines one at a time, and there’s a general challenge with Coronavirus vaccines and nobody has been able to get them right. The Moderna vaccine has issued a press release. I swallowed the hook, line, and sinker by that purpose followed the press release. Essentially, they use initial results from the clinical trials. That’s a huge triumph for Moderna.
None of them appear steep. I have read the press release critically. Moderna did not release the raw data or the actual study. It was enough information in that press release. It indicates that they have a very serious problem with that vaccine. Let me tell you what those signals are. The vaccine is great hope because it’s an RNA vaccine. It is the one where it alters human DNA in your individual cells to start producing antibodies for the virus. It doesn’t require huge production facilities.
There’s not the kind of production where you’re growing virus on, which is very painstaking on a series of different animals up as you grow it on pangolin, dog tissue and then on feral monkey kidneys then you transfer it to lung tissue and do all that, which it is time-consuming. It requires a lot of room and materials. The RNA vaccine was sold to us as a way to shortcut all that and to instantly create vaccines that work and note that they altered your DNA.
This is not the first RNA vaccine that has been developed, right?
It’s the first of this generation of RNA vaccines ever developed. The kind that they’re talking about is this has not been done before, although there are some that have been first-generation RNA vaccines. This is the one that alters your cells to get your cells to produce a vaccine. This has not been done before. What they did is they use a mouse trap, but they never reported a safety study for the mice. The mouse trials were efficacy trials. They were just looking for seroconversion. In other words, they were looking for whether or not they could make the mice produce antibodies using this RNA path, but they weren’t looking at the health of the mice, and it’s not a good animal to look at anyway.
Usually, those health studies are done on ferrets and primates. Particularly for a Coronavirus upper respiratory, the ferrets are the closest analogy to human studies. They skipped those. They went right to an RNA vaccine and to human trials. They got 45 volunteers in Seattle. They gave 15 of them a low dose, 15 a middle dose, and 15 a high dose. Of the 15 that got the high dose, 3 of them had what was called in the press release Serious Adverse Reactions. There’s an FDA definition for that, which is an action that requires medical intervention or hospitalization. These are serious impacts.
The fact that they occurred in 20% of the individuals if it were any other medication would be DOA. Nobody is going to take a medication for healthy individuals for an illness that you don’t have that could put 1 out of every 5 people in the hospital. Not only that, but these are very healthy people. They only allowed super healthy people into this study. What happens when you give this to someone who has diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune diseases, or any of these others?
Fifty-four percent of the American citizens have a chronic disease which is comorbidity. Those don’t react well with vaccines. This vaccine should be dead. The initial reports caused Moderna’s stock to spike, even though the owners of Moderna have been unloading stock all week. They know and they endorse it. They said this was a huge triumph and caused it to spike. We put out our own analysis of that and the stocks were already tanking.
When you say you put out your own analysis, are you referring to the Children’s Health Defense?
Yes, I put it on Instagram.
I get what you are saying because you can say you are having positive results if the little mice developed antibodies, but that’s not positive if they are sick. In other words, it’s not hitting the objective, which is to live a long, healthy life.
The problem with a lot of the analysis that does not take place with vaccines is nobody ever looks at whether vaccinated individuals are healthier and longer-lived than unvaccinated individuals. There are a few studies where that’s been done. I put about 50 of those on our website. Consistently the unvaccinated people are much healthier than the vaccinated and much longer lived.
I can’t put my finger on why that information is not getting out to the general public. In other words, why does everyone believe they are safe and effective when in reality, they are causing a lot of chronic conditions and illnesses among our children and anybody who is vaccinated.
That’s the big problem. You are not allowed to talk about this issue in the media. Part of it is that particularly, in the United States, the big television statements, the electronic media, and the newspapers are getting huge amounts of revenue from the four vaccine companies and from pharmaceutical advertisers in general.
There are only two countries in the world where pharmaceutical companies are allowed to advertise the right to consumer advertising. It is illegal in every other country except the United States and New Zealand. We made it legal. FDA, which is owned by Pharma, made it legal in 1997. Now you have Anderson Cooper and Eric Marcusson sponsored by Pfizer.
Roger Ailes told me that in some years, 70% of Fox’s advertising revenue during the evening news was from Pharma. He said, “On average, 17 of 22 ads on network news come from pharmaceutical companies.” They are not only able to advertise, but they are also able to dictate content. They have made the evening news essentially a vehicle for pharmaceutical marketing and advertising. That’s why every year, you see these big weeks where everybody is talking about the flu vaccine or measles vaccine, “You got to get your vaccine.” It gets drilled into us. Nobody is looking at the science and saying, “This vaccine doesn’t work. How does it prevent disease?”
Cochrane Collaboration is the ultimate arbiter of pharmaceutical science. It is a group of 30,000 scientists who do not have ties to the pharmaceutical industry or the pharmaceutical products that they are reviewing. Cochrane Collaboration was started because there was recognition that the pharmaceutical companies had taken over the scientific journals. They basically owned all of the scientific journals and they were able to publish only science. The scientific journals themselves all admit this very little of the science that is on the internet now comes out of the medical journals, the scientific journals.
Cochrane Collaboration was funded to remedy that by overlooking the pharmaceutical industry science and critically reviewing it. They have reviewers that look at the selected articles and the selected themes. In 2010 and 2017, Cochrane reviewed all the articles on the flu vaccine. In 2010, there were 247 articles that they looked at. They came back with a series of conclusions. Number one, in order to prevent a single case of flu, you have to inoculate 100 people. This is very low efficacy on flu vaccines. No industry like you to think.
A 100 vaccines to prevent one case of flu and there was zero evidence that there were any deaths or any hospitalizations prevented. The whole rationale of the flu vaccine is that it would prevent deaths in the elderly and when Cochrane said and the BMJ, the British Medical Journal, did its own research, a scientist and an editor name Peter Doshi. What they said is that there is zero evidence that it prevents deaths among the elderly.
In fact, since the flu vaccine got universal coverage for the elderly, deaths in the elderly have increased dramatically. Lifetime mortality has risen and life expectancy has declined. This flu vaccine has had no beneficial effect. Cochrane has had a number of other studies. If you get the flu vaccine, you are much more likely to transmit the flu to other people. You are six times more likely than an unvaccinated person. The other rationale for the flu vaccine is that it will reduce transmission, but that is definitely not true. It increases transmission.
There are all these slogans on a bus stop near my house that say, “Spread love, not the flu.” They make it seem like it’s very altruistic of us to get the vaccine. It sounds like somebody has bought a lot of ads, and even some of the media is captured by the pharmaceutical dollars, and this is influencing what we hear.
They’re not kind of captured. They are altogether captured.
This is alarming. What you are saying about the flu vaccine is particularly pertinent because some people see a parallel between how we were told the flu vaccine would help eradicate flu and we are being told that the Coronavirus vaccine is our only hope.
There’s a cognitive dissonance there because we’ve had a flu vaccine for many years and yet, it only gives an advantage to 1 person in 100, but it does not prevent the flu. Everybody knows this, incidentally, but anecdotally, those who get the flu vaccine also get the flu, and oftentimes they are worse flu. That’s just not anecdotal.
There’s study after study. This is one of the things that the Cochrane Collaboration said that the studies suggest that you are much more likely to get a non-flu upper respiratory infection like Coronavirus if you have had a flu shot. The Pentagon published a study in January of 2020. The author of the study was Wolfe in January 2017.
The Pentagon wanted to see if the flu shot was effective against Coronavirus. They gave the flu shot to a lot of soldiers and then there was a control group that didn’t get it. They watched what happened. They found that the soldiers who got the flu shot were 36% more likely to get a Coronavirus than soldiers who did not. That’s not an outlier study. We publish on the Children’s Health Defense website on whole six other studies, and some of them are very strong.
Nobody ever looks at whether vaccinated individuals are healthier and longer-lived than unvaccinated individuals.
They indicate that people who get the flu shot are more likely to get Coronavirus or an upper respiratory viral infection like Coronavirus. It appears to damage your immune response. It’s called Pathogenic Priming. It appears to prime your system to get other illnesses. It may protect you against a certain strain of flu, but it makes it much more likely, at least what the science indicates, to get other non-influenza infections.
I’m thinking about how a lot of vaccines include adjuvants that are irritants and cause the body to have this immune response that the vaccine is looking for. That can lead to complicated health concerns and results. I know for a time we were greatly advocating for mercury to be taken out of vaccines, and I think to a large extent, it has, and yet there’s still aluminum, formaldehyde, glyphosate, and other ingredients that are very problematic in vaccines.
Mercury was taken out of the pediatric vaccines in this country, not in other countries. We still give them to poor countries, like African, Asian, and Latin American countries. They were taken out of the Hepatitis B and the DTaP vaccines in our country. In the same year 2003 that they took them out, CDC mandated the flu vaccine for pregnant women and for children from six months of age and every year thereafter.
That flu vaccine was loaded with mercury, has huge levels of 25 micrograms of mercury and is 25 times the EPA’s maximum safe level. It’s given not once, but it’s given to little babies while they are in their mother’s wombs when they are most vulnerable and their brains are still forming. It’s given every year of life. We never had a break from mercury.
They did replace mercury in some of those vaccines, the adjuvant with aluminum, which is not as neurotoxic, but it is horrendously neurotoxic. Mercury is the most neuro-toxic element in the universe that we know about that is not radioactive. The aluminum is not quite but almost as neurotoxic as mercury. When it combines with mercury, it has a synergistic effect that makes it more neurotoxic than either of them alone. It often is combined because if your child goes in and gets an aluminum vaccine for DTaP, Hib, or Hepatitis B, and the doctor gives him a flu vaccine, it is the same. There is no illness, which is through gene, then he’s getting mercury and aluminum the same day, and that’s horrendous for him.
The reason they put adjuvants in shots is because they realized, from the polio vaccine, when you give a live virus vaccine, the virus goes through the human body, mutates, and ends up in the feces or in other waste. That can pass that virus on to other people. Not only that, as it mutates going through the body, it can become more virulent, more dangerous, and more lethal. Seventy percent of the polio cases on Earth are coming from Bill Gates’ oral polio vaccine. This is according to the WHO. The vaccine itself can spread the disease. Live virus vaccines like the Chicken Pox, MMR, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis vaccines all spread the disease.
If you get a flu vaccine, you are six times more likely to pass the flu on. If you get a Chicken Pox vaccine, the manufacturer’s insert says, “Do not go near pregnant women for six weeks or for people who are immune-compromised,” because you are shedding that virus for six weeks. Early on, the regulators expressed a preference for dead virus vaccines, which do not do that. The problem is the dead virus vaccines do not provide the kind of robust and durable immune response that scientists or the FDA require to get a vaccine license.
Vaccinologists very early on discovered that if they added something horrendously toxic to the vaccine, it would shock your body. Your immune system associates the antigen, that fragment of the dead virus, with the toxic adjuvant and says, “This thing is dangerous. I need to mount a huge immune response if I ever see it again.” They can prolong the immune response and make it more robust if they put something dangerous in the vaccine. It is very toxic.
They began experimenting with really toxic things like oil and squalene, and they found the most toxic things were mercury and aluminum. They began adding that to the vaccines and the vaccinologists or immunologists or, generally speaking, neurologists weren’t biologists or toxicologists. There’s a war between toxicologists and virologists because the toxicologists would say, “You’re getting the immune response and a license. What is the fate of that metal after it gives you the immune response? Where’s it going?”
The virologists said, “Don’t worry about it. We don’t care where it’s going. That’s going to be a long-term issue.” There was never any science that said, “Let’s look at what’s happening to all these horribly toxic things they are putting in the vaccines and whether those things are causing long-term problems in these children.” Those studies were never done. We have these vaccines that are loaded with things and aluminum.
We have kids who are getting Alzheimer’s when they are ten years old. We have a whole generation of children who have neurodevelopmental disorders. There are 54% of kids now have a chronic disease. They have ADD, ADHD, and tics which we didn’t know of before these vaccines. Tourette’s syndrome, narcolepsy, AST, Autism. We have autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and all the allergic diseases.
Aluminum causes allergies. My kids all have allergies. Nobody had an allergy when I was a kid. I have 11 brothers and sisters and 70 cousins on both sides. None of them had food allergies. My children have food allergies, and they’re in every class. Why is that? It’s because of the aluminum in the vaccines. I was one of the founders of the Food Allergy Initiative, which is now the biggest food allergy advocacy group in the world. We raise hundreds of millions of dollars to study food allergies. The scientists, who we brought on and gave grants to were studying how we fix food allergies.
Nobody wants to look at where they are coming from because they know they are coming from the vaccines. The way that they test medications and therapies for food allergies is they give food allergies to rats. They test the medications and the cures on the rats. How do they give a food allergy to a rat? It’s very simple. You take aluminum adjuvant, the same ones in the Hepatitis B, DTaP, and Hib vaccines, and you combine it with a peanut protein or whatever allergy you are trying to induce. That rat now has a peanut allergy for life. That’s how they induce peanut and food allergies.
If you are putting that aluminum into a vaccine and there is also already an animal protein in there, which there are in most vaccines, they are made on animal sub strains. There’s casein and lactose. You wonder where all the lactose intolerance comes from and allergies. What about the casein allergies? If there happens to be a Timothy weed outbreak, the week that you gave your vaccine, you are now going to have a permanent allergy to Timothy weeds, which is why vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis as unvaccinated children.
The virologists who are developing these, people like Anthony Fauci, are completely immune, let’s say, to looking at these connections. They won’t do it. They are pretending that they don’t exist. It’s magical thinking on their part. You could take an entire generation of children and inject them with the most neurotoxic elements in the universe, adding hundreds of times the levels that EPA says are safe and that you’re not going to have an effect. You have an effect and we are watching it all around us now. We are the sickest generation in history with the highest level of chronic disease in any generation in the entire world.
Coming up. Robert suggests how to communicate this information to friends and loved ones. He also talks about what drives him to speak out on this very controversial issue.
We pause now to recognize our sponsors.
Go to GreenPasture.org and place your order.
Visit AncestralSupplements.com to try out Ancestral Supplements Lung, Thymus, and Colostrum.
I’ve got a lot of folks asking me, “What can we do to convince our family members and our friends who really have bought the standard line that vaccines are fine? How can we wake them up?” What do you do when you’re trying to persuade or talk to someone who has a completely different viewpoint?
Anybody who has an open mind, I can convince that there is a problem in maybe fifteen minutes. The problem is when they go back out into the world and they encounter all of this extreme hostility, it’s not like they get to debate it. They are told by their doctor and leave if you’re going to bring that up. They are told by the press, “You’re crazy. This is dangerous stuff that you’re talking about.”
Those people, even if they have doubts, they are not going to talk as openly about them because the consequence of speaking openly about this issue are enormous for your life, and people don’t want to do that. That’s the problem. IF somebody has an open mind, they will quickly be convinced just by looking at the evidence. A lot of people don’t want to look at the evidence. Orthodoxy is a biological impulse.
It’s part of who we are. It was a beneficial asset during the 20,000 generations that our species was wandering the African savannahs and the small warring groups. It was a good follow, a strong and bigger sense of cohesion to not express doubts about the plans or the cosmology. Those people who were ok to harm people who didn’t believe what you believed in. Anybody who did, you should not be questioned or criticized.
The strong man and subjugated woman are what the vaccine orthodoxy is all about. It begins with misogyny and the willingness to dismiss the stories of a million women who say, “I gave my child a vaccine, and he was never the same.” There are millions of women in our country who say that, and we’re supposed to be listening to women now. We are supposed to be standing up to bullies, but that’s not what’s happening.
We have an entire orthodoxy that says these women have been deluded, they don’t know what they are talking about, misled by the British Svengali named Wakefield. He’s taken all these poor, ignorant women who are grieved by the loss of their child and he’s been like the Pied Piper and led them astray. We need to bring them back with real science. Nobody is listening to them. Those mothers know what happened to their babies.
If you get a flu vaccine, you are six times more likely to pass the flu on.
Let’s say I’m one of those moms and I’m like, “I want to protect my family from further damage and I understand there is a movement to make this Coronavirus vaccine mandatory.” How likely do you see that?
I think there are going to be efforts to do that, certainly. It’s interesting what’s happening because the people who were vaccine-hesitant or questioning vaccines, it was only 2% and 3% of the population and now it seems to have gone up to 20%. I’m not going to say it’s exponential, but even nature, which is very right in the middle of the vaccine camp study in which they looked at the growth of vaccine hesitancy and skepticism. What they found was nobody goes from being a vaccine skeptic back into the orthodoxy. Raise to capture the bulk of people who are undecided that it’s almost all won by hard science.
People ultimately will listen to evidence. These mothers saw what happened to their children and then they went on the internet and people say, “They are getting information from the internet.” They are, from PubMed. PubMed is where all the peer-reviewed studies are published. It’s on the internet and these mothers are reading it. They are not just reading garbage blogs from some guy that’s locked in his mother’s basement. That’s what it’s making it sound like a 30-year-old that is living in his mother’s basement and trying to delude all these women.
What they are doing is going on PubMed, which is a site that’s operated by NIH. It’s an archive of all the peer-reviewed scientific literature. You can go on there and you start looking at vaccine literature and you can learn a lot. We then archive those on our website at Children’s Health Defense. We have about 1,400 studies listed on our website, and we teach you how to read them critically.
We teach you how to look at the CDC studies. CDC has a tiny handful of studies on grade south and these studies say everything is safe. We say, “Do they really? How come they are only for one vaccine, which is the MMR? How come you have never once looked at a vaccinated group and compared its outcomes to an unvaccinated group?” All seventeen of their studies compare heavily vaccinated populations to heavily vaccinated populations.
It would be like studying the link between lung cancer and cigarettes by looking at people who smoked 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years and comparing them to people who smoked 22 cigarettes a day for 20 years. If you want to know the answer, that is not how you do it. You look at people who have never smoked any cigarettes. That has never been done.
When they have some of these studies, they say they are giving a placebo to some of the animals and not to the other ones that get the vaccine. The placebo actually has some of these adjuvants and things in there that will cause a similar reaction. Is that what I hear you saying?
When they test prior to licensing, you’re supposed to use an inert placebo. Even Stanley Perkins said, “If you don’t use an inert placebo, it’s not science. It’s marketing.” If you want to know the safety profile of exposure, you need to measure health effects in an exposed population against an unexposed population. What they did is they never used an inert placebo. Placebo, by the way, is defined by the CDC as something that has no effect on the human body. They use aluminum adjuvants. They use some of the most neurotoxic elements of the universe and they will give that to 5,000 girls.
As long as the vaccine outperforms the neurotoxin in the amount of sickness it produces, they say, “It’s a great success.” All they have to do is make sure they kill more people with the placebo than they do with the vaccine. When Merck tested the HPV and the Gardasil vaccine, they gave the girls in the control group horrendously toxic aluminum adjuvant. It was pure aluminum. Those girls in that group had nine deaths in the vaccine group. They said, “It’s the placebo. Therefore, it’s not safe.”
I was thinking about what you said about how people who dare to question are bucking the orthodoxy and it makes me think of you. What keeps you speaking out on this topic when you’re risking your reputation and a lot of other things as well?
I don’t even know that I have a choice. The two things are out of the two. When I started reading the science, I saw what they were doing to kids and I realized the implications, and I was like, “What am I going to do?” I’m seeing kids who have severe autism and they don’t have a moment of comfort in their lives. Their lives are just a nightmare of darkness and unjoylessness. In most cases, these are kids that will never have a conversation. They will never take a girl on a date, be in the Army, write a poem, hit a home run in a baseball game, or vote or run for political office. Half of them will never use a toilet.
These kids would have been outstanding members of our society in many cases. Many of them were kids who, prior to getting their vaccines, were exceeding their milestones. They were way ahead of their peers. These would have been exceptional children in many cases and we took that away from them. We sentenced them to a lifetime that’s worse than death or hell.
Their headbanging, spinning, and their constant agony and gut problems, their brains hurt and burn all day long. Have so much of it they try to bang their heads against the wall to stop the pain. They do that day after day. They have to wear permanent helmets and can’t speak. I’ve been around intellectual disabilities my whole life. I’ve never met a single person like that my age. It’s not like they are in institutions somewhere. There are institutions that are housing.
For my generation, the science says 1 in 10,000, but I don’t even believe it’s that common because I’ve never met anybody like that. I worked at home for the retarded throughout high school and I was raised in special Olympics. I’ve never met anybody my age who looks like that, like a kid who has severe autism. Nowadays, it’s 1 in every 34 kids or 1 in every 22 boys. We did that to these children. I don’t feel that I have a choice. If I could save one child from that, it would be worth me giving up everything.
I know a lot of people who feel similarly. I know people who are ready to move their whole family to another country. They said, “Please ask Robert if there’s a place we can move to go to be safe.”
There is no place to go. There are countries like Sweden that do not mandate vaccines but very few of them. Even Denmark already passed a law that says, “When we get a Covid vaccine, everybody’s got to take it.” Even civilized countries or countries that we once regarded as civilized have been caught up in the hysteria, and that is, “How can you mandate a medical, pharmaceutical product that has never been tested? Nobody knows whether it works or it’s going to kill more people or cause more deaths.”
Let’s talk to somebody. Let’s say they are living in a country that’s definitely said that they are going to have mandatory vaccinations. What action can they take now to prevent that from happening to them and their family?
They’ve got to get politically involved, “We’ve got to stop being silent and contaminated.” You need to carry cards on you and have a list of vaccine injuries. If you see a mother walking on the sidewalk with a baby or a pregnant woman, hand it to her, and talk to your doctor and nurse. Make them confront it. They’ve been able to silence us for too long. Everybody has got to stand up and be counted.
You’ve got to talk to your neighbors even when they don’t want to talk to you. Talk to people who used to be hostile to you and let’s deal with the hostility. We are making cards for people that they can hand out at Children’s Health Defense. You can order those cards from us, carry them on you, and do a civic duty. If you see a woman who’s pregnant or who’s pushing a stroller, hand her the cards. They have a list of all the vaccine side effects listed by the manufacturers. We have other cards that show the lack of testing, and it’s all science-based.
The doctors aren’t telling them that and you need to start telling them that and start educating the people. We need more people. Getting up to around the 20% conversion rate is high. People are listening to it now because they are watching these Covid vaccines get made and they are going to be able to see how the sausage gets made for the first time.
None of these vaccines have ever been made in the sunlight before. If you’ve got a problem with cockroaches, the way that you solve it is through daylight. We’ve got a big cockroach problem in the vaccine industry, and if all we need to do is shine some sunlight on it, they are all going to go running for cover because they can’t survive scrutiny.
I’m thinking back to when you said if you had fifteen minutes, you could share information with someone with an open mind that they would be persuaded. Is what is on those cards what you would share in those fifteen minutes probably?
A lot of it. It’s enough to get people to start asking questions. Here are the vaccine ingredients that your child is going to get in their first five months of life. It is insect parts, virile monkey kidneys, cocker spaniel parts, and DNA from a baby who was forcibly aborted by a woman and confined to a mental institution in 1966, and then made carcinogenically or made it immortal. That’s what they grow the vaccines on.
DNA from that baby, which is male DNA is going to be injected into your female baby. Nobody knows what that does. Nobody knows if you take a woman or a child that may have heritable, inherited mental illnesses and you inject them into people. That’s in our vaccines. DNA has been cut up in fragments and put into our vaccines. Nobody knows what that does. It’s tumorigenic and we now have an explosion of soft tissue tumors and cancers in that whole vaccine generation.
Nobody can explain it. There may be other reasons for it. We have our children swimming around in a toxic soup of chemicals. There are plenty of things that cause cancer, but we should not be taking vaccines that cause cancer. We have a right to know whether they are or not. There are a lot of indications that they are and there’s no proof that they’re not.
Do you think it’s possible to develop any kind of a safe vaccine?
Let’s look at the science of vaccines and make sure that people can educate other people.
I don’t know but I hope so. There’s an effort to do that. Why would the companies make that effort? They can’t be sued. There’s no liability. There’s no incentive for them to make a safe vaccine and there’s no scrutiny. They have the regulatory agencies that should be scrutinized or captured and they are part of that industry.
I forgot the liability thing. What about moral consciences like, “I don’t want to be developing something that’s going to hurt people?”
These four companies are all convicted felons, Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, and Glaxo. Those four companies in the last years have paid $35 billion in criminal penalties, civil penalties, damages for falsifying science, defrauding regulators, lying, cheating, stealing, bribing, and blackmailing doctors. They’ve been caught. Time after time, they get caught in killing hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Merck, which is the biggest vaccine maker in our country in 2006, paid $7 billion for Vioxx for killing between 120,000 and 500,000 Americans with a drug that they marketed as a headache pill that they knew caused heart attacks. They knew it because, in their clinical trials, they saw a lot of people dying from heart attacks. They went to the bean counters.
The bean counters at Merck said, “Even if we kill these people, we are still going to make more money, even if we have to pay them all off.” They went out with this drug, and the people who were getting that drug, who were taking Vioxx, did not know that it caused heart attacks because Merck kept that a secret. What makes you think that the morality that you imagine these companies have would attach itself to vaccines but all the other drugs where they can get caught because you can sue them.
The vaccine is the only place they can never get caught. No matter how negligent they are, how malicious, how toxic their ingredients are, or how grievous your injury is, you cannot sue that company. The only reason they got caught on Vioxx and the other drug is that the private plaintiff’s attorneys sued them on behalf of an injured party. During the discovery process, they stumbled across documents that showed that they had violated criminal statutes. The attorneys walked those documents down to the US Attorney’s office and said, “You should prosecute these guys criminally.”
That could never happen with vaccines. With vaccines, it’s a good thing for them to injure as many people as possible. Most companies are making $60 billion a year selling us mandatory vaccines. They are making $500 billion selling us the EpiPen, albuterol inhalers, the diabetes medications, the rheumatoid arthritis medications, anti-seizure medications, and all these medicines that if you look at their top twenty drugs, now blockbuster drugs from these companies, virtually all of them, are targeted to treat diseases that are listed as side effects from the vaccines on their own manufacturer’s insert.
They make us sick and then they try to sell us the cure?
It’s the perfect business model there. If you get measles or chickenpox, what’s the cure? A week in bed, chicken soup, and vitamin C. You can’t have any of that. Nobody is making money on it. You don’t even go to the doctor. I have eleven brothers and sisters. We all got chicken pox and measles, and we never saw a doctor. You just caught it. We had chicken soup and vitamin C, that was it and we went back to school.
If you can give that kid an MMR shot, it gives you Guillen-barre, seizures, or epilepsy. Now you have a lifetime customer or narcolepsy from the flu shots. Those companies have the perfect business model. They have a mandatory drug that can make us all sick, a mandatory one that is given to healthy kids and make them all sick, and then they sell us the treatments for the rest of their lives. I’ve got kids that are going to be buying $600 EpiPen until the day they die.
Our goal is to get the word out so that we can keep people healthy and strong so that these companies won’t have any more customers. The goal of the Weston Price Foundation is to see healthy and happy people. Those who are opting out will eventually be the control group that everyone will be able to see. I sometimes think our children are our best testimony of what a healthy life looks like. Do you know what I mean?
That’s exactly right and that’s what we’re going for. Let’s look at science and make sure that people can educate other people. They don’t have that.
Let me just ask you the question I always pose at the end. If the reader could do just one thing to improve their health, what would you recommend that they do?
What I would recommend people do is go to Children’s Health Defense and join the resistance. We have plenty of Army. You could follow me on Instagram, Facebook, etc. We need to be able to reach you. Join the Army. We need your email so we can communicate with you even when we get expelled.
We will find you on an alternate platform or wherever it is. Thank you so much for your time. Thank you for your work at Children’s Health Defense.
Thank you very much.
Our guest was Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Visit ChildrensHealthDefense.org for more resources. Find me at HolisticHilda.com. Now, for a letter to wrap up our time together, “The last few days, I’ve been binge-listening to the Wise Traditions show. Each episode features a different guest and they are jam-packed with information about eating real, traditional foods.
Near and dear to my heart are the episodes that discuss farming, gardening, and animal husbandry. I must say the lessons on healing your bodies through food are absolutely mind-blowing. I can’t get enough. I’m addicted to the way this real food and real living make me feel. Now it’s time to dig deeper and keep up this momentum.”
That’s Emily from North Carolina. Emily, thank you so much for your support. We appreciate it so much. You guys, go ahead and write a Letter to the Editor to put it into our upcoming journals or write a review on Apple Podcast. We are going to try to get more of these out there. We appreciate so much the fact that you are reading. Stay well. Hasta pronto.
About Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr is the founder of Waterkeeper Alliance, as well as Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and of counsel to Morgan & Morgan, a nationwide personal injury practice.
Mr. Kennedy is an esteemed author, with a long list of published books including the New York Times’ bestseller, “Crimes Against Nature.” Mr. Kennedy was named one of Time magazine’s “Heroes for the Planet” for his success helping Riverkeeper lead the fight to restore the Hudson River. His reputation as a resolute defender of the environment and children’s health stems from a litany of successful legal actions. He received recognition for his role in the landmark victory against Monsanto, as well as in the DuPont Case that inspired the movie “Dark Waters” (2019).
- Instagram – Children’s Health Defense
- Food Allergy Initiative
- Facebook – Children’s Health Defense
- Apple Podcast – Wise Traditions
🖨️ Print post
sea nettles says
Wonderful. Absolutely wonderful. RFK is a hero – literally. I learned something new – and I am looking forward to handing out the cards I didn’t know CHD has for us.
Of note *Whenever I go through information there’s inevitably something mixed in that is often enough, an appeal to common belief fallacy. Here it was the “Out of Africa” theory – which remains a theory only. That’s neither here nor there, it was just a quick illustration made to articulate why humans might attack those pushing against the status quo. At other times when dealing with issues like vaccination, it’s fallacies about WWII – and other cherished appeal to common belief fallacies. I’d just like to note that here for anyone visiting. The Out of Africa theory remains theory – humans are a hybrid species. That is relevant to this and all other issues. Those controlling Big Pharma are the original eugenicists, and they absolutely know what I’ve just asserted. As much as they tout diversity, as they are of that same school of thought, they seem to be doing everything they are able to decrease long-term diversity. They have their own ethnic and in-group preferences – and those are best researched on your own rather than stated here. That said, I did want to point this out to those who are here, probably, because they are indeed willing to question long-held paradigms and have uncomfortable feelings due evidence they dig up.
Thanks so much for posting this interview with RFK Jr. – I am a huge supporter of his. He’s amazing.