Have you ever looked at the sky and been surprised to see clouds that don’t look like normal clouds? There are often streaks of white traversing overhead. Where do they come from and what are they doing to us? Dane Wigington is the lead researcher and administrator for the website www.geoengineeringwatch.org, and the executive producer of the documentary, “The Dimming.” He has a background in solar energy and was a former employee of Bechtel Power Corporation.
He has amassed facts that point to covert global climate engineering operations. This is the crux of geoengineering: an effort to manipulate the climate and manage solar radiation. But it appears to be detrimental to the health of soil and people.
Dane explains how he got into this field and what he has uncovered since that time. He differentiates between so-called chemtrails and contrails and emphasizes that those atmospheric particles left in the lingering, spreading jet aircraft trails, are NOT simply condensation as we’ve been led to believe. Finally, he offers advice on what to do to diminish the fallout from the chemicals that may be falling from the sky.
Check out his website and watch the documentary “The Dimming” at geoengineeringwatch.org.
Register for our Wise Traditions conference in November in Texas.
Visit our website for more resources and the podcast transcript.
Listen to the podcast here:
Geoengineering: Fact Or Fiction?
Within the below transcript the bolded text is Hilda
Have you ever looked up at the sky and been surprised to see clouds that don’t look like normal clouds? They don’t look anything like cumulus or cirrus or stratus clouds. They look more like someone painted streaks of white and patterns across the sky. This may be the result of Geoengineering. If it is, the clouds are anything but benign. This is Episode 326. Our guest is Dane Wigington of GeoEngineeringWatch.org. Dane is the Lead Researcher for the site. He is the Executive Producer for the groundbreaking climate engineering documentary, The Dimming. He has a background in solar energy and was a former employee of Bechtel Power Corporation and a licensed contractor in California and Arizona. Dane has devoted many years of his life to constant research on the issue of covert global climate engineering operations and the effort to expose and halt them.
This is the second in our Out There Series. We’re putting this episode out there even though it may seem a little bit out there. The views expressed like many of those on the Wise Traditions Show are not necessarily those of the Weston A. Price Foundation but they are weighty enough that we wanted to put them out there for your consideration. Dane introduces us to the concept of Geoengineering for the purpose of manipulating the climate and managing solar radiation. All causing harm to our soil and health.
He discusses how he got into this field, trying to understand why there was a massive plant die-off on the land he was managing and he tells us about what he has uncovered since that time. He implicates the EPA, the FAA, NASA and other agencies and what is happening to our planet. He differentiates between so-called chemtrails and contrails. He emphasizes the atmospheric particle testing conducted by his organization has proven the lingering, spreading jet aircraft trails are not simply condensation. As we’ve been led to believe. Finally, Dane offers advice on what to do to diminish the fallout from the chemicals that may be falling from our sky.
Coming up, Dane talks about the pH change in the soil in Northern California on that land that he managed East of Lake Shasta. Some say that pH change may have happened naturally. Dane disagrees and he explains why. He also closes us out, offering advice to minimize our exposure to stratospheric aerosol fallout.
Check out his website and watch the documentary “The Dimming” at GeoEngineeringWatch.org. Register for our Wise Traditions conference in November in Texas. Check out our sponsors: Real Salt, Prima Foodie and Cold Plunge. Visit our website for more resources.
Welcome to the show, Dane.
Thank you for having me. Thank you for your willingness to address the climate engineering issue.
I have to ask you right off the bat. When I look up in the sky, I see these lines all the time. I’m thinking, is this a more frequent phenomenon than it was in the past?
It is climate engineering, also known as the Solar Radiation Management Operations. These are the scientific terms or geoengineering stratospheric aerosol injection. These are the terms for what’s being conducted in skies all over the world. The most important question to fill in would be the condensation trail narrative. Here’s how I would address that. We have up-close film footage of GeoEngineeringWatch.org taken at altitude from behind these aircraft as they’re dispersing with nozzles visible turning on and off. That’s the end of the argument. This is not condensation. In almost all cases, this is a spray dispersion.
We know that all commercial carriers and all military aircraft are fitted with what’s called a high bypass turbofan jet engine. It’s a jet-powered fan. Ninety percent of the air that moves through that engine is not combusted. That engine by design is nearly incapable of producing any condensation trail except under rare and extreme circumstances. We have up-close film footage of these dispersions taking place at altitude with nozzles visible. We have still photographs of the retrofit nozzles attached to the aircraft wing pylons aimed into the exhaust jet stream to make this look like condensation. The primary elements named in climate engineering patents are showing up in every single lab test taken of precipitation, surface waters all over the globe.
This is fascinating because of what you’re saying about the nozzles. I see what you’re saying. This really matters. This is not just exhaust. This is not the condensation that we’ve become accustomed to seeing at the edge of a jet or when an airplane goes by. This is something else coming from a different source.
There is no purpose for having a nozzle on a wing aimed at an exhaust jet stream except dispersed materials. This is much like what you see in an air show, Hilda, when you see these dispersions of smoke. Smoke is a particulate. Geoengineering elements are particulates. The primary particulate name in geoengineering elements is aluminum because its reflective and the stated goal is to reflect some of the sun’s incoming thermal energy with not any apparent regard for the consequences. The reason it looks very similar to what you see coming out of aircraft at an air show is that in both cases, it’s a particulate being dispersed.
We have the entire science community calling for exactly what we see in our skies. The entire global climate science community is calling for geoengineering to be deployed. It’s the spraying of light scattering particles into the atmosphere by aircraft to disperse some of the sun’s incoming thermal energy. Everything they described including the materials is exactly what we have monitored and tried to disclose. They tell us what we’re seeing or we’re not seeing. The elements in our lab tests are not related. At a certain point, the whole denial aspect of this becomes completely ludicrous.
I want to get into that in a moment. First, I want to ask you. Dane, when did this idea emerge that something other than water or condensation was being admitted or sprayed from airplanes?
For me personally? My background is in renewable energy. I worked for Bechtel Power, the world’s largest engineering firm. I spent my life trying to get out of the smog in Southern California. I finally made it to the wilderness of Northern California, off-grid home. Full solar was on the cover of the world’s largest renewable energy magazine. I began to lose massive amounts of my solar PV or Photovoltaic uptake from whatever these aircraft were emitting. That cannot be condensation. I was shocked to find the mountain of data on geoengineering solar radiation management operations. I researched the primary elements named in patents for those operations.
I began to test my precipitation at the state-certified lab and I did not want to find what I found. I found primary climate engineering elements, aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese. I was simply forced to face the fact that these operations were indeed ongoing. There’s so much material falling on us through our breathable air column that it has changed soil pH values in the forest of Northern California. I have in my possession the USDA historical baseline so we’re not guessing. I’ve done testing in the field with USDA scientists. The falloff in these programs is immense but that’s what brought it to my attention. The fact that it was blocking so much of the sun was radically interfering with my renewable energy. That is the stated purpose of these programs, to block the sun.
I know in 1996 the United States Air Force published a report saying that they were trying to do some weather modification. Is that blocking the sun? Is that part of that program or plan?
These programs all overlap but in the case of the document you’re speaking about Owning the Weather where they speak of weather as a “force multiplier,” weather warfare is not new. It’s a historical fact. For example, Project Popeye in Vietnam, the modification of the precipitation over the Ho Chi Min Trail. This is incredibly well-documented historical fact. We know we’ve had US weather modification programs going back to immediately after World War II. Project SIrUS was hurricane modification in 1947. These programs have been ongoing for a very long time. We have patents going back over 100 years. We have a full list of patents at GeoEngineeringWatch.org. The ability to modify the weather as the document you refer to speaking of it as a force multiplier, is a crown jewel weapon for the military-industrial complex.
They can bring countries to their knees without those countries, the populations of those countries even knowing they’re under assault. If we look at the Middle Eastern countries, most specifically the countries that were named immediately after 9/11 as target countries, all of them subsequently underwent a once-in 1,000-year drought. That’s statistically, mathematically impossible without some climate intervention. Those countries happened to be the ones that underwent such a severe drought. We have the leaders of those countries in the case of Iran on the floor of the UN stating emphatically that NATO was cutting off their precipitation.
We know from geoengineering science research that when you put these particles into the atmosphere if you oversaturate the atmosphere, there are too many condensation nuclei. The droplets don’t combine and fall as rain. They simply stay aloft or migrate. These particles are desiccants also. They absorb atmospheric relative humidity, which doubling back makes any “condensation trail” even less likely. Weather warfare is not new. It’s well-documented. It’s certainly a prized tool of the military-industrial complex.
In 2000, the EPA, the FAA, NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration all published a response to the accusations that they were putting out chemical trails instead of condensation. They said it was all baseless conspiracy theories. What you’re saying makes it seem they are saying that and it flies in the face of the facts.
Isn’t it interesting that they resort to the same tools? Let’s call it a conspiracy theory. They marginalize anybody who dares to show any proof and we don’t talk about it anymore. That starts with the “chemtrail’s term.” That term is a non-science term. We stress to people that are trying to address this issue, “Use the science terms. Climate engineering, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injections, solar radiation management and you cannot be so easily marginalized.” There are very specific tactics being used by the government to try to deny these operations at you. At GeoEngineeringWatch.org, we have documents going back decades. Some of them are 800 pages long. I’m talking about, in that case, a US Senate document outlining the scope and scale of these programs.
As of decades ago, they’re funding in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Your audience can look at these documents themselves with the key portions highlighted already by GeoEngineeringWatch.org. In these documents, the Intergovernmental Cooperation is spoken of, that even countries with hostile relations will cooperate on the climate engineering issue because of the “cross border ramifications.” You can’t geoengineer over your own country without affecting the entire world. They’re all doing this for their own purposes but primarily it’s to mask the true severity of climate damage. In doing so, inflicting much more damage still. In the case of NOAA, we at GeoEngineeringWatch.org acquired an NOAA flying lab, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Flying Lab. We tested the particulates being emitted from heavy aircraft at altitude. Guess what we found? Climate engineering particulates.
Your audience can watch this testing on film with the documentary that we posted titled The Dimming, referring to solar dimming, which is what geoengineering does. Interestingly enough, the liability issue is so massive. That’s what’s named in this document too. Everyone involved in these programs has total blanket legal immunity from whatever catastrophe that they caused. Not surprisingly, governments around the globe are desperate to keep this from coming to light.
Once the populations know that the atmosphere has been tampered with on such a scale, every single weather event becomes a potential liability to governments all over the world. They will understandably do whatever they can to mask this, deny it from public view but we proved it with an NOAA flying lab. Not surprisingly, Facebook because of a single individual who might debate it on air, tried to deny this issue on Facebook. They flagged our documentary, The Dimming but you can still see it on our homepage. We encourage people to view it, share it and decide for themselves based on the proof we present in that documentary.
You’ve given us so much to think about, Dane. I’m still processing it all. The censorship is alarming but at the same time, in this day and age, we see it as par for the course. It’s the way of covering up any information that differs from the mainstream narrative. These organizations and these countries have a lot to lose if it is found that they are tampering with the climate because they’re also tampering with our health. Isn’t that true? Let’s talk a little bit about the particulates. What is being admitted according to Geoengineering Watch?
I can tell you what our lab tests have proven. We’ve taken 70 in Northern California alone. We have many more from around the world. We know that coming down through our air column, there are incredibly high amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, polymer fibers. In the case of aluminum, I want to put this into context. Many aluminum have fallen in precipitation from the skies in Northern California that it has changed soil pH values 10 to 12 times toward alkaline from 5.4 to 5.6 to 6.6, 6.8. Those are inconceivable changes. This is testing done in the field with USDA scientists that I work with. To try to imagine how much aluminum that is? Imagine we’re breathing that in. Is it any wonder that for example, Alzheimer’s and dementia, are an epidemic around the world. It’s the number one cause of death in the UK. It’s officially third in the US. We think it’s higher but they’re not disclosing that.
We know from peer-reviewed science studies that without aluminum in the equation, there would be no Alzheimer’s in the normal human lifespan of 100 years. That’s a peer-reviewed study. Aluminum is the core of the whole equation. To add one more statement, if your audience viewed The Dimming, they can see me confronting Dr. David Keith, the world’s most recognized geoengineer at an International Geoengineering Conference. At the end of his symposium, he proposed dumping ten million tons of aluminum nano particulates into the atmosphere annually. Nano particulates are inconceivably small. The smaller the particle, the more harmful it is to every single form of life especially us.
I confronted him at the end of that conference. Had he done any toxicological studies, human health, environmental toxicity? His first response was and I’m paraphrasing, “We studied the particulates in the atmosphere. A little more won’t hurt.” They banned me from the conference after this question from all subsequent conferences. I asked Dr. Keith, “Those particles aren’t aluminum. Have you studied aluminum?” Your audience, if they watch The Dimming, can see Dr. Keith say, “We haven’t studied aluminum. Could terrible things happen tomorrow? We don’t know.” What kind of an answer is that from the world’s most recognized geoengineer?
I’m thinking some of these scientists were coming up with these plans. Are they not considering that it’s going to hurt? He hadn’t even thought that perhaps this thing could hurt us or are they thinking about the benefits of blocking the sun? I’m trying to wrap my head around it.
Let me try to help with that. First, in regard to him not knowing, he can’t not know. Aluminum is harmful to every form of life on the planet. Every single form. Two, here’s their words. Here are his words. It’s a “risk-to-risk” scenario. The risk of doing it versus the risk of not doing it. What Dr. Keith is referring to, what the science community is referring to is we’re in a runaway event now in regard to global climate collapse. It’s accelerating at an unimaginably non-linear level. In their frame of mind or from their perspective, this is simply an evil that must be undertaken. There’s a lot of money behind these programs and a lot of people that are reaping unimaginable profits.
What they are not considering in these programs, in the attempt to mask the symptoms, is further fueling the overall process. I covered that in one of my weekly broadcasts, the Global Alert News Broadcast at GeoEngineeringWatch.org. Climate engineering programs are altering upper-level wind currents that are altering ocean currents. We now have warm water pumping into the Arctic where it’s thawing methane on the seafloor. That methane is releasing in mass quantities. It migrates to the sea surface then into the atmosphere. It’s lighter than air so it starts to cover the planet like a layer of glass. It migrates into the upper layers of the troposphere. Methane, over a ten-year time horizon, is up to 120 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. That’s why nighttime low temperatures are rising twice as fast as daytime highs.
Consider that when you put particles in the atmosphere to blocks in the sense, incoming daytime thermal energy, those same particles trap heat at night. That’s not hard to figure out. We have a lot of vested financial interest in this. We have an interest in military weaponry if you will. There are a lot of people that are not willing to let go of this, no matter how much destruction it does. We simply have to disclose it. The planet has to be allowed to respond or our timeframe on this planet will be very short indeed.
I’m grateful that you and your team have made The Dimming and that you have done a lot of investigative work. The audience may want to access the reports that you have. Should they go to GeoEngineeringWatch.org to find them?
Yes and we try to make our reports easy to find. For example, you can search GeoEngineeringWatch.org Methane Release, GeoEngineeringWatch.org Drought, GeoEngineeringWatch.org Wildfires. We have toolbars at the top of our site. We are non-political. The reason environmental groups are not addressing this issue and we know because our attorneys have spoken to their attorneys is they’re afraid of losing their 501(c)(3) non-profit. In regard to, for example, the drought in California, which I know firsthand because I live here, is beyond horrific. In fact, statistically, it’s the worst drought in at least 1,200 years.
You can look at our disseminations going back nearly a decade where we stated emphatically, this will happen. If these programs continue, it can’t not happen. It is happening. I’ve had personal meetings with the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom. They know what’s going on. They won’t address it because of fear of losing their funding. Let’s all pretend it’s not going on until we completely decimate the planet’s life support systems. We have a great many reports at GeoEngineeringWatch.org. They are easy to find. The toolbars at the top are very simple. Geoengineering Wildfires, Geoengineering drought. Hilda, there’s also the engineering winter aspect if you want to shine a little light on that. That’s a key component of climate engineering that most people are completely unaware of.
It’s interesting that you’re mentioning that, Dane. I have a friend that was in Virginia, in the mountains near West Virginia and she said it started snowing. She was like, “This doesn’t look like any snow I’ve seen before.” Her friend who lived there said, “We call this Chem Snow.” My friend was aghast. What she realized is, “This is why I’ve never seen it before.” It was an unusual and almost slimy kind of snow. Is that what you’re referring to?
It’s exactly what I’m referring to. It’s called Chemical Ice Nucleation for Weather Modification. We have the patents for these processes at GeoEngineeringWatch.org. With chemical elements, it’s like the ski resort that can chemically nucleate snow and have a ski slope full of snow and mountains that are bare dirt. It’s the same process. When they see the clouds and when you have a military tanker that can carry 100 tons of this material in one payload. It’s believable what they can accomplish. It creates a cold insulator of air that descends to the ground. The flakes are very different from a naturally nuclear flake. They’re slimy because these mixes contain surfactants. The surfactants are what make soap. It changes the molecular tension in water. This snow is extraordinarily slick. We see traffic accidents everywhere from people that thought they knew how to drive in snow.
When we look at Dallas, Texas, for example. Let’s look at how profound they can cool the surface down. These surface cool layers may only be a few hundred feet deep but it creates the sensationalized headlines they want. It confuses the population as to the true state of the climate because you get these massive cold events then they can try to divide the population. Many are thinking there can’t be global warming. Look how cold it is in Texas, for example. When Dallas was 0 degrees at the same time and latitude in Florida, it was 85 degrees, we didn’t see that in the headlines did we.
At the same time that Dallas was 0 degrees, it was 33 degrees warmer at the North Pole. This is an anomalous surface cool down with moisture from the Gulf of Mexico that was chemically nucleated. Look at the damage and decimation they’ve caused. This is a key aspect. It’s engineering winter. We have the patents and there are so many extraordinary examples. Another example is from Texas, May 1, 2013. I’m a real Texan. I know these figures inside out and upside-down. May 1, 2013, Amarillo, Texas was 100 degrees on the ground, an all-time record high for the day. It snowed the next day.
Are you kidding me? I didn’t hear about this.
I wouldn’t think you would. The media doesn’t like to talk about events like this. Do you remember the big cattle die-off in Dakota on October 4, 2013? One hundred thousand cattle died in a freak snowstorm. Do you remember that? Try to imagine, we captured the maps because they took them offline very quickly. As far as taking things offline, GeoEngineeringWatch.org is the largest site in the world on this subject. Thirty-seven million viewers and counting. We were at the top of the first page for a google search of geoengineering terms.
Overnight, it disappeared. Gone from twenty pages on the subject. That’s how radically they’re trying to censor us. Back to the cattle. Try to imagine in South Dakota, cold-hardy cattle. Cattle are cold-hardy. October 4, autumn, freak snowstorm kills 100,000 cattle. It started snowing at 40 degrees Fahrenheit. This snow is extraordinarily cold to the touch because it’s been chemically nucleated. It’s like dry ice. It’s an artificially nucleated material. It’s adhesive. It’s heavy. It sticks to the cows, on their snouts. If they can’t breathe through their nose, they suffocate and they die. That’s what happened.
We had pictures four days afterward. They’re lying around in the mud, dead, 100,000 cattle. At the same time, these cattle were dying from the snowstorm in South Dakota. At the same exact time, we have the weather maps to prove it. It was 85 degrees and raining in Chicago. It was 89 and raining in Kansas City. How in the world could you have a snowstorm kill 100,000 cattle in South Dakota with snow at 40 degrees? This is weather warfare. We’ve documented all of this. I’m giving one small example. The same thing happened in South America, killing 250,000 cold-hardy alpacas. Nobody’s covering this.
Why would they go after those particular cities or towns? In other words, why would there be a targeted snowstorm in South Dakota or freezing temperatures in Dallas? Is it to practice? Are they implementing this? Is it getting out of control?
I’m not saying they’re targeting South Dakota or the cattle necessarily but you have massive sensationalization of these events. It provides fodder for all those who want to believe global warming is not happening. In fact, what we face is exponentially worse than global warming. It’s an abrupt climate collapse but they use these events to skew the temperature data. For example, in Dallas. When that cold event happened, they’ll take 100 times more cold record temperatures over a specific sized geographic area. If it’s record heat, they’ll take 1/100th of that many. It skews the temperature data to the downside to mask the true severity of planetary meltdown.
That is one primary reason. Two, the sensationalization provides fodder to all those that rant things like the coming ice age or all the other completely baseless statements they put out. It simply provides cover. It masks the true severity of warming so they can keep business as usual for longer. you have a lot of people invested in this. An awful lot invested in this and they’re not likely to turn back, Hilda. The military-industrial complex goes in one direction.
Dane, I can’t help but think since we’re talking about the military, sometimes there are soldiers or officers who see that something is a mess and want to start a rebellion. At least in the movies and the things I’ve seen that happens. In real life too there are people with consciences. Are there some, besides Geoengineering Watch, that are keeping their eye on this and starting to speak out?
Yes and thank you for bringing up that point. In fact, it is in that very arena that I would argue is our only chance of stopping these programs is to waken the US Military. In the film, The Dimming, there are two high-ranking US Air Force Generals, a Brigadier General and a Major General. Two-Star Generals are speaking out on this issue. I encourage your audience to see what they have to say about this. They are under confidentiality agreements. There are things they can say. There are things they cannot say but they say more than enough to fully acknowledge these programs are real.
We know what happens to whistleblowers. Julian Assange is certainly a stunning example of that and many you never hear of because their communications are monitored. Those fires are put out before they can even start to burn. I think those in the military are well aware of this. They’re not going to line up to throw themselves under the bus, if you will. Let’s look at what happened to the whistleblower on the US Torture programs, John Kiriakou, who was the only one to go to jail. The only one, the whistleblower. Think about that. John Kiriakou went to jail for exposing the illegal US International torture programs.
Those in control and in power are holding onto it and continuing on their way. This has been a big wake-up call for me. I’m grateful for those who are speaking up at great cost but I want to ask you too. For those of us who are regular individuals, seeing these planes flying overhead with these particles, particulates that are coming down at us. Do we have any recourse?
You can try to chelate these particles out of your system. I assure you, all of us are absorbing these. They’re extremely bioavailable. It means they’re very readily absorbed and they’re bioaccumulative. If they go in, they don’t come out. Chelation can help but it’s essential that we stop the exposure as soon as we can. I would recommend your audience they speak to nutritionists. Chelation is something that must be done carefully. Ultimately, we must stop the source or it’s a matter of time for all of us. If there’s one more existential threat I could add to this, that’s immediate. It’s the complete collapse of the ozone layer. The single greatest destructive factor in regard to ozone layer collapse is climate engineering. I’m not denying all of their sources of anthropogenic damage to the ozone layer. Not at all.
I’m very versed in anthropogenic climate change. What I’m stating is, the single greatest factor is climate engineering, which also involves extremely powerful radio frequency microwave transmissions which are used to manipulate these particles in the atmosphere. That’s another layer to this. We’re working with a former NASA contract engineer that’s metering UV levels for us. We are getting UVC on the surface. That’s the last spectrum of UV Radiation before X-ray. The ozone deterioration is so rapid at this point that on the current mathematical trajectory, this contract engineer gives us until about 2025 or 2026 until we face total ozone layer collapse. What happens then? We can’t grow food, plankton will all die. We are on a limited timeframe after that.
Even now, we’re seeing those effects. It’s scorching plants, burning bark on trees. You can feel it on your skin. I encourage your audience to pay attention to their senses. The surface of cars, for example. The radiant heat is very intense if they’re in full sunlight. The ozone layer, a diminishment is not uniform. You can have one day that doesn’t feel too bad and other days might feel horrific. The ozone collapsed by itself if we had no other threats. That is an immediate existential threat to all of us.
I’m taking in what you’re saying. It does sound very alarming. It is of great concern and I’m glad you’re bringing it up. I wish we could talk further about the whole non-native electromagnetic frequencies that are affecting the movement of the particulates and their behavior but our time is running out. I want to ask you a couple more things, although when I say that time is running out, it sounds like that’s what you’re saying too.
In a bigger context, yes.
I want to ask you too. Are there places we can go, Dane, that are free of this interference with nature, these particulates coming at us?
No. The atmospheric saturation is ubiquitous. Although there are regions that hit harder than other regions. For example, the moisture that migrates from the Pacific to the West Coast is hit particularly hard because they try to migrate the moisture inland where it’s used for other processes like the cooldowns you might’ve seen in Denver. Denver has gone twice from about 85 degrees record high to 12 degrees in 24 hours. They’ll migrate the moisture inland, which means the spraying along the Pacific Coast is worse. There are some areas that are hit harder but it’s not the aerosol operations that are happening overhead that fall in a particular region. It’s what’s happening upstream. That’s important for people to remember.
They might think they’re breathing clean air because they don’t see anything above them but it’s what’s happening upstream that matters. These particles are so small. They stay aloft for extended periods of time and they’re migrating all over the globe. There is definitely no place to hide from this fallout.
It’s so interesting you should say that because I look up at the sky and a lot of times the sun looks hazy or there are clouds that look like formations I’ve never seen before. That may be a consequence of these particulates staying aloft and interfering even with my direct view of the sun. We get energy from the sun. We get nutrients from the sun too. I’m afraid that’s being cut off as well.
You are completely correct. About 95% or 98% of the US population is vitamin D deficient. Once you alter the lightwave link and that’s exactly what you’re seeing. You’re seeing aerosol cloud formations. This is in no way, shape or form any type of natural cloud formation. When that alters the lightwave link, let’s look at what it does is solar photovoltaic we’ll take, which is what got me into this issue. Even though the radiant light or the actual visible light maybe not diminished much, the fact that the light wavelength form is being deflected we might see a 50 drop in solar power uptake.
What’s it doing to photosynthesis? What’s it doing to our body’s ability to create nutrients like vitamin D, as you expressed? The ramifications are so grave with the total interference of Earth’s life support systems and complete contamination of the entire planet. That’s simply what we’re talking about with this issue. That’s why we’re focused on it. I never wanted to do this. I’m not an activist. I’m not politically oriented but I simply couldn’t look the other way, Hilda.
We are so thankful that you did pick up this baton. You didn’t have this intention at the start and yet here you are. I’m grateful, Dane, that you took the time to talk with us and you’re charging forward this information that is not always well-received. I did receive it well, I’m thankful. I want us to be informed because I think that’s the first step before the next step. If you don’t know, you can’t act. Now we know and what are we going to do with it? I want to ask you if our audience could do one thing to improve their health, it might be related to what we’ve been discussing or it might be something else on your mind. What would you recommend that they do, Dane?
Heavy metal chelation. That must be done carefully with knowledge. I would recommend people talk to a nutritionist. Profound results can be gained through an appropriate heavy metal chelation protocol.
Thank you for that advice. Thank you for your time. We look forward to speaking with you again sometime.
Thank you very much. My deepest gratitude to your group, giving a voice to this most critical issue.
Our guest was Dane Wigington. For testimonials from scientists, former US forest service workers, former members of the US Air Force, former California Department of Fish and Game and more, see the latest released documentary, The Dimming, on the homepage of the website GeoEngineeringWatch.org.
About Dane Wigington
Dane is the lead researcher and administrator for the website www.geoengineeringwatch.org, and is the executive producer for the groundbreaking climate engineering documentary, “The Dimming”. He has a background in solar energy, was a former employee of Bechtel Power Corporation and was a licensed contractor in California and Arizona. Dane has devoted the last 20 years of his life to constant research on the issue of covert global climate engineering operations and the effort to expose and halt them.
His personal residence was featured as a cover article in the world’s largest renewable energy magazine, “Home Power”. He owns a wildlife preserve next to Lake Shasta in Northern California. Dane has appeared in numerous films and interviews in his effort to educate the public on the extremely dire environmental and health dangers we face from the ongoing global climate intervention.